Musharraf’s Party Projected to Lose–Badly

Let’s see if these results last after they count the vote, but it looks like Musharraf’s party lost today’s election–resoundingly.

From unofficial results the private news channel, Aaj Television, forecast that the Pakistan Peoples Party would win 110 seats in the 272-seat National Assembly, with Mr. Sharif’s party taking 100 seats.

Mr. Musharraf’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Q, was crushed, holding on to just 20 to 30 seats. Early results released by the state news agency, The Associated Press of Pakistan, also showed the Pakistan Peoples Party to be leading in the number of seats won.

The Election Commission of Pakistan declared the elections free and fair and said the polling passed relatively peacefully, despite some irregularities and scattered violence. Ten people were killed and 70 injured around the country, including one candidate who was shot in Lahore on the night before the vote, Pakistani news channels reported.

Fearful of violence and deterred by confusion at polling stations, voters did not turn out in large numbers. Yet fears from opposition parties that the government would try to rig the elections did not materialize, as the early losses showed.

If it’s true that Musharraf’s government didn’t (or didn’t succeed in) rigging the elections, score one for democracy. But that doesn’t mean the US is prepared to deal with the aftermath–even if, as projected, Bhutto’s party the PPP comes out ahead.

The results opened a host of new challenges for the Bush administration, which has been criticized in Congress and by Pakistan analysts for relying too heavily on Mr. Musharraf. Even as Mr. Musharraf’s standing plummeted and the insurgency gained strength, senior Bush administration officials praised Mr. Musharraf as a valued partner in the effort against terrorism.

The NYT, at least, makes it sounds as if Musharraf is ready to pack it in.

Two politicians close to Mr. Musharraf have said in the past week that the president was well aware of the drift in the country against him and they suggested that he would not remain in office if the new government was in direct opposition to him. “He does not have the fire in the belly for another fight,” said one member of his party. He added that Mr. Musharraf was building a house for himself in Islamabad and would be ready soon to move.

What will Dick Cheney do without his faithful puppet?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

15 Responses to Musharraf’s Party Projected to Lose–Badly

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz Reason #58,397 #ESPN sucks salted bags: They are anti-evolution http://t.co/7Mzbv0xnoi This is just pathetic.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR And just doing crim, not immigration work, prob not the best guy to say. Will try to remember to ask around.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR Here is something on DL's http://t.co/lMOA6AIMIJ As far as the arrests, I haven't seen them, but I've not had any Dreamer clients yet.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joshgerstein Fair question
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @joshgerstein: Even if Obama has authority, can execution-challenged admin handle estimated 5 million applications from immigrants? http…
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @onekade @Nero @20committee Glad to see they got that little twit Jefferson Obama in there.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR Or, you know, Texas. And, really a lot of states that are Republican controlled.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR That I think yes, because paying taxes is contemplated and there are already provisions for DACA people in this regard.
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR But heres thing, pretty much all states have question "Have you ever had a previous license?" Do you lie (fraud) or admit yes (fraud)?
38mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR ah, see, these are the kind of places problems could arise. My understanding most states can get driver's license (Not sure here tho)
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @conor64 @Peggynoonannyc Actually there is support that Founders contemplated Congress being the foremost of the three equals, not President
51mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2008
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272829