Jane Harman: Stupid and Reckless, Not the Victim of Illegal Wiretaps

There are a lot of reasons to be appalled by the story of Harman’s agreement to pressure DOJ in exchange for help getting a Chairmanship, and by Gonzales’ decision to drop an investigation so he could protect himself.

But the fact that Harman was picked up on a wiretap is not one of them. 

The CQ story makes it clear that this wiretap was court approved and was directed not at Harman, but at the suspected Israeli spy whom she was talking to.

What is new is that Harman is said to have been picked up on a court-approved NSA tap directed at alleged Israel covert action operations in Washington. [my emphasis]

Now, we know from the court documents in the AIPAC case that there have been wiretaps involved going back years–probably as early as 2002. And it has been reported that the original focus of the investigation was Naor Gilon, an Israeli widely suspected of being a spy, not Larry Franklin or any other American. 

In other words, the investigation–and the wiretaps–were the classic, proper use of FISA: for an intelligence investigation targeting suspected agents of a foreign power operating in the US. And it goes without saying that we all better hope the NSA listens closely to conversations between powerful members of Congress and suspected spies, and that when they make quid pro quo deals, that conversation gets looked at much more closely. This was a totally proper use of NSA wiretaps. 

What is absolutely astounding, however, is that someone well-versed in intelligence like Harman got on the phone with someone reported to be under investigation at least a year earlier, agreed to a quid pro quo, and then said (so the NSA could hear her), “This conversation doesn’t exist.”

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

93 Responses to Jane Harman: Stupid and Reckless, Not the Victim of Illegal Wiretaps

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @robertcaruso Duckworth was a no as well. @colinwilhelm
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cate_long Sort of. Doesn't foster a really healthy life style.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cate_long Huge chunk of that is in Monterrey, in area that a few years ago was badly racked by cartel violence.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @phillipanderson "Footie for women"
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Anyone got a split of how OEF/OIF Vets voted on Iraq 3.0, in both House and Senate?
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @noFelld Hey now. My mom was programming computers with men in suits by then.
42mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Am I correct that in Scotland ladies count paper ballots while men in suits look over their shoulders?
56mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @hmintz: Bonds arguments over, things don't look good for government
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @hmintz: Barry Bonds obstruction conviction appears to be on thin ice in 9th Circuit. Govt attorney getting shelled, no bullpen help in …
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I actually like the sound of bagpipes. #ConfessYourUnpopularScottishOpinion
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joanneleon Is roll call up?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @FedcourtJunkie: Judge Fletcher to gvt, defending Barry Bonds obstruction of justice conviction: "I find your reading of the statute abs…
1hreplyretweetfavorite