Jane Harman: Stupid and Reckless, Not the Victim of Illegal Wiretaps

There are a lot of reasons to be appalled by the story of Harman’s agreement to pressure DOJ in exchange for help getting a Chairmanship, and by Gonzales’ decision to drop an investigation so he could protect himself.

But the fact that Harman was picked up on a wiretap is not one of them. 

The CQ story makes it clear that this wiretap was court approved and was directed not at Harman, but at the suspected Israeli spy whom she was talking to.

What is new is that Harman is said to have been picked up on a court-approved NSA tap directed at alleged Israel covert action operations in Washington. [my emphasis]

Now, we know from the court documents in the AIPAC case that there have been wiretaps involved going back years–probably as early as 2002. And it has been reported that the original focus of the investigation was Naor Gilon, an Israeli widely suspected of being a spy, not Larry Franklin or any other American. 

In other words, the investigation–and the wiretaps–were the classic, proper use of FISA: for an intelligence investigation targeting suspected agents of a foreign power operating in the US. And it goes without saying that we all better hope the NSA listens closely to conversations between powerful members of Congress and suspected spies, and that when they make quid pro quo deals, that conversation gets looked at much more closely. This was a totally proper use of NSA wiretaps. 

What is absolutely astounding, however, is that someone well-versed in intelligence like Harman got on the phone with someone reported to be under investigation at least a year earlier, agreed to a quid pro quo, and then said (so the NSA could hear her), “This conversation doesn’t exist.”

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

93 Responses to Jane Harman: Stupid and Reckless, Not the Victim of Illegal Wiretaps

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @alymaybe Dunno and doubt it, but that'd be another great phish spam: wedding emails you need to opt out from.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Is being a misogynistic abusive jackass a prerequisite to playing for Florida St? Guess @FSUCoachFisher didn't see a title in latest abuser.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Honestly not sure Donald Trump is mentally acute enough to understand the charges against the immigrant he is relentlessly sliming.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Wet snout ale! http://t.co/c7KZzBJJUB
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @dcbigjohn That's okay, you have a really pretty avatar!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Throws like a girl https://t.co/LhA2ynsyzN
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @joshgerstein: DHS chief Johnson, immigration brass ordered to Texas court in flap over Obama executive actions lawsuit http://t.co/2LaO
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @p2wy Do you have to buy a plane ticket for it or will it be a lap infant? @april_anita
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @rortybomb "Make America Great Again"
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @TimFernholz: Maybe the greatest statement ever issued by a presidential campaign https://t.co/BQpNsfEemh
6hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @20newsguy: We have a "foolproof" system Proof there are fools out there
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @michaelwhitney Call me.
6hreplyretweetfavorite