Jane Harman: Stupid and Reckless, Not the Victim of Illegal Wiretaps

There are a lot of reasons to be appalled by the story of Harman’s agreement to pressure DOJ in exchange for help getting a Chairmanship, and by Gonzales’ decision to drop an investigation so he could protect himself.

But the fact that Harman was picked up on a wiretap is not one of them. 

The CQ story makes it clear that this wiretap was court approved and was directed not at Harman, but at the suspected Israeli spy whom she was talking to.

What is new is that Harman is said to have been picked up on a court-approved NSA tap directed at alleged Israel covert action operations in Washington. [my emphasis]

Now, we know from the court documents in the AIPAC case that there have been wiretaps involved going back years–probably as early as 2002. And it has been reported that the original focus of the investigation was Naor Gilon, an Israeli widely suspected of being a spy, not Larry Franklin or any other American. 

In other words, the investigation–and the wiretaps–were the classic, proper use of FISA: for an intelligence investigation targeting suspected agents of a foreign power operating in the US. And it goes without saying that we all better hope the NSA listens closely to conversations between powerful members of Congress and suspected spies, and that when they make quid pro quo deals, that conversation gets looked at much more closely. This was a totally proper use of NSA wiretaps. 

What is absolutely astounding, however, is that someone well-versed in intelligence like Harman got on the phone with someone reported to be under investigation at least a year earlier, agreed to a quid pro quo, and then said (so the NSA could hear her), “This conversation doesn’t exist.”

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

93 Responses to Jane Harman: Stupid and Reckless, Not the Victim of Illegal Wiretaps

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @runtodaylight: Cannabis credit union in Denver sues Federal Reserve over rejection https://t.co/mZ2K4BnNGm via @YahooPolitics
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @robertcaruso: DoD Instruction 5410.16, DoD Assistance to Non-Government, Entertainment-Oriented Media Productions, July 31, 2015 -- htt…
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Department of Energy: CyberSprinting Backwards https://t.co/Pats4FAOv4
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @charlie_savage Do you have a sense which of those are new fr FISCR declass? The 2nd KK opinion is, and the transcript.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Sulu holds my newspaper for me and Riker is not amused. http://t.co/oisbdBeb89
59mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Oh noes! it looks like @banditelli has lost @bandatellispants again. https://t.co/ZXEXGeRbhZ
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Shhh! Don't tell the chainsaws! They get jealous.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JimWhiteGNV Because it makes the chainsaws run so well?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Guys, it's Saturday. A good day to get that lube job for your lawn mower. And maybe a gallon of that nice marine fuel without ethanol.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tweetsintheME Then I noted in complaints @benjaminwittes conflating "Obama admin" w/"NatSec establishment." I'm paying attention! @AZoeB85
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tweetsintheME I'm a critic. I pointed out he missed some things. @benjaminwittes didn't acknowledge that part. @AZoeB85
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mla1396 You mean the GitHub proof of concept or the pawn everything in govt hands?
2hreplyretweetfavorite