What Did BushCo Hide By Not Revealing Surveillance Activities?

Via Threat Level, I see the EPIC has written a letter to Pat Leahy complaining about the Bush Administration’s failure to comply with requirements that it release details on the number of "pen register" and "trap and trace" orders.

As a reminder, "pen registers" are when the government collects the metadata from your telecom contacts–the phone numbers you call and the length of calls, as well as whom you email–to figure out who you’re talking to. And "trap and trace" orders are when the government figures out who is calling (or emailing) you. In addition, the EPIC letter explains that law enforcement has recently been using "hybrid" orders to pinpoint cell phone (and therefore, your) location.

Law enforcement agents use "hybrid" orders for cellular location information. Hybrid orders seek to determine a suspect’s past and future location based on non-content data transmitted by the suspect’s cellular phone. The government has engaged in this type of surveillance by invoking a combination of authorities under the Pen Register Act and the Stored Communications Act.

For pen registers and trap and trace, the government doesn’t have to get a warrant (the hybrid stuff is still up in the air). Instead, since 1986, DOJ has been required to report how much of this stuff is going on.

But, as EPIC explains, DOJ didn’t release the report publicly for the years 1999 through 2003, and only gave incomplete information to Congress at all in November 2004. And DOJ  appears not to have released reports at all since 2004.

You probably see where I’m going with this. 

We know, of course, that Bush’s illegal wiretap program involved some kind of data mining aspect.  It appears that they were doing pattern analysis based on things like length and recipient of call–precisely the kind of thing you get from pen registers–to determine whom to further wiretap.

Yet we have only incomplete information from the first three years of Bush’s illegal wiretap program. EPIC explains that DOJ did not include the suspected offenses that law enforcement officers were trying to investigatre, nor did it list which officers were doing the investigations.

And then we have nothing–no data–for the years after Jim Comey and Jack Goldsmith supposedly put the illegal wiretap program back on legal footing (and remember–the data mining aspect of the program was reportedly one of the things that Comey et al went crazy over). 

Now, the failure to report any information may be at least an attempt on the part of the Bush Administration to hide abuses of these authorities (How useful would it be, for example, to learn precisely how often Chris Christie–who is running for governor in NJ–used these "hybrid" orders and on whom?). But I’m more interested in whether, after the Comey rebellion, they decided to justify data mining using an expansive application of pen registers; I’ve already shown that they actually used a hybrid approach to justify the program itself, and I would be unsurprised if an abuse of pen registers is part of it. 

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

16 Responses to What Did BushCo Hide By Not Revealing Surveillance Activities?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @mla1396 Yes, I realize. That's sort of what I meant by tweet: AFGE has standing to complain, most OPM victims don't have same heft.
45sreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ethanbrown72 @adamjohnsonNYC @NewYorker That is a win/win any day of the week!
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @mattkbh: BREAKING: Donald Trump says a kind thing to Hispanic immigrant https://t.co/ckTCyvQnYE
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @saftergood: Prisoner incarceration in the US "has probably reached the point of diminishing returns" says new CRS report http://t.co/GV
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Worth watching AFGE as one entity that can fight for recourse for employees on OPM hack, including this suit. http://t.co/sottite0sR
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Boy SCOTUS' leftward tilt -- and Con's unhappiness with it -- didn't last out a probable anti-labor cert, did it?
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel ISIS catching up to KSA on the beheading front again. http://t.co/zAGO44nmoS https://t.co/r1cVYy0bUr
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DonteStallworth But where's the spoiler alert? @Cirincione
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bsdtectr I get criticized for using it all the time. You're not supposed to use it bc Access.
42mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JPughMI I live in and like this state (but not its gov) and can't understand how good beer makes us #1. Please explain.
43mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KenGude But I'd add: most have been at Gitmo for 13 years w/no trial. We'll have to invent word for prosecutors waiting out death soon
44mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KenGude Yeah, when I thought about it it made sense. And @carolrosenberg has written abt rising costs tied to aging detainees.
45mreplyretweetfavorite