Is Obama Fixing to Own Some Banks?

The other day, I suggested that Obama’s principles of government ownership sounded like they were designed for more than just GM.

There’s evidence to support that suggestion in this reasonably good David Sanger article on the GM bankruptcy.

In interviews in recent days, Mr. Obama’s economic team said it anticipated [political pressues regarding business decisions related to companies the government owns], and had moved to cut them off early.

It started right around the time of the bank stress tests,” said Rahm Emanuel, Mr. Obama’s chief of staff, in an interview on Monday. During one of the president’s daily economic briefings, Mr. Emanuel added, “he said that taking over companies like this is a big deal, and that no president has ever faced anything like this before. And he said he wanted to see some rules of the road about how the government should act” when it suddenly becomes the biggest shareholder in the market.

Mr. Obama clearly wanted protection: a set of principles he could hand to angry members of Congress, campaign contributors or executives to explain why he would not call Fritz Henderson, G.M.’s chief executive, to discuss whether an engine should be made in Saginaw or Shanghai.

The result was an interagency task force informally called “The Government as Shareholder,” headed by Diana Farrell, the deputy director of the National Economic Council and formerly the head of the McKinsey Global Institute, the research arm of McKinsey & Company.

It was Ms. Farrell’s report, delivered to the Oval Office fewer than 10 days ago, that laid out the principles that Mr. Obama described on Monday.

The White House insists the principles will apply equally to the government’s investment in the American International Group, the fallen insurer, or in Citigroup and other banks that the government has rescued. [my emphasis]

Sanger doesn’t seem to get the implication of Rahm’s comment. Rahm tells us these principles–principles the government will use with companies it owns–came up not during auto task force discussions, but during the bank stress tests.  That means the conversation about socialism how big a deal it is for the government to own companies came up in the context of owning banks, not owning car companies.

Sure, we already own an insurance company and Freddie and Fannie. Sure, maybe the reference to Citi is a very pointed reference. 

But it sure seems like these principles suggest we’re going to be owning a bank in the near future, to go along with GM and AIG.  Looks like we’re all going to get a chance to be banksters soon!!

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

70 Responses to Is Obama Fixing to Own Some Banks?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @nickshaxson: #HSBC and the world’s oldest drug cartel http://t.co/j90dtgSpti What an inglorious, bloody, druggy history that scandalhou…
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bartongellman I keep prepping snarky tweets abt it but then coming back to that point. What's his gig? @JameelJaffer
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TimothyS Very good skill everywhere. Too much college writing instruction is abt English papers, not even--say--science lab reports.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TimothyS Tho I will say I approve of teaching kids in college to write memos.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TimothyS Also: Petraeus failed with the last two surges. Let's consult with him on the ISIL surge!
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Clapper's description of the unpredictable instability of the world is pretty damning if you're the world's hegemon. https://t.co/EZw06bBcoC
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steve_vladeck I'd be at least as interested in whether it would cover DNA, bc I've suspected they've done that, too.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @michaelwhitney Don't think that's please. At least in my house that's "Cmon, how many times do I have to remind you morning routine?"
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DaveedGR I'm not sure ANY of that follows. Press is very selective abt what and where it covers.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sbagen You're complaining about sun? You can have light or heat. Not both. Until June.
3hreplyretweetfavorite