Bybee: No Written Advice Provided to Any Agency Prior to August 1, 2002

 When Jay Bybee responded to written questions from Carl Levin about the torture authorizations in October 2008 (at a time when the Office of Professional Responsibility investigation was well-advanced, if not done), he made the following assertion.

While Judge Bybee said that he did not recall "any written advice provided to any governmental agency prior to August 1, 2002, on the meaning of the standards of conduct required for interrogation under the federal anti-torture statute or on specific interrogation methods," the August 1, 2002 memos were not the only occasion on which DOJ provided legal advice on the CIA’s interrogation program.

That’s interesting, because we know that on July 13, 2002, John Yoo wrote John Rizzo a letter in which he mapped out how to avoid prosecution for torture. He wrote:

This letter is in response to your inquiry at our meeting today [not attended by Bybee] about what is necessary to establish the crime of torture, as set forth in 18 USC 2340 et seq. The elements of the crime of torture are: (1) the torture occurred outside the United State; (2) the defendant acted under the color of law; (3) the victim was within the defendant’s custody or physical control; (4) the defendant specifically intended to cause severe mental or physical pain or suffering; and (5) the act inflicted severe mental or physical pain or suffering.

[snip]

Moreover, to establish that an individual has acted with the specific intent to inflict severe mental pain or suffering, an individual must act with specific intent, i.e., with the express purpose, [sic] of causing prolonged mental harm in order for the use of any of the predicate acts to constitute torture. Specific intent can be negated by a showing of good faith.

Now, it’s possible that Bybee did not consider this "written advice," but it sure seems to address the topic at hand (and note, Bybee did not say "opinion," but only "written advice"). It’s possible he lied–though I would imagine his answers to Levin very closely matched the answers he gave to OPR to what would presumably be remarkably similar questions.

Just as likely, I think Bybee may not have known about this letter.  On June 22, 2004, the day OLC withdrew the Bybee One memo, John Rizzo faxed the letter (including the fax cover sheet Yoo originally used) back to Daniel Levin. That either suggests Rizzo was trying to remind Levin of the meeting on July 13, 2002 (which Levin had attended as FBI Chief of Staff). Or he was providing OLC, where Levin had moved, with a copy of a letter that was not otherwise in their files.

This earlier letter lays out the torturer’s strategy for establishing a  "good faith" immunity from torture. Is it possible Bybee didn’t know about it?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

62 Responses to Bybee: No Written Advice Provided to Any Agency Prior to August 1, 2002

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz The Feds Feds targeted Denny Hastert, and then looked for the crime. Not exactly the proper use if US criminal law http://t.co/mkh3qMsedr
7mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz And how is Bahlul coming along? https://t.co/5zCPReJhNl
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @walterwkatz Russia has more reason than just their own significant corruption to be pissed, bc of that precedent. @ScottGreenfield
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @walterwkatz One big reason for EDNY, I think, is bc of JFK precedents like Bout. @ScottGreenfield
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This is spot on: https://t.co/9drOYgC0ZJ
31mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Taniel Liberals can't stand Kyrsten Sinema either, but she has far better statewide recognition+is a light years better campaigner than AK
32mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Taniel I don't think Kirkpatrick can beat either McCain or Salmon. She has no statewide recognition, and most liberals don't care for her.
35mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Dissembling security+foreign policy stooge inadvertently proves in @WSJ why Edward Snowden is an international hero http://t.co/7agRcYSkHN
50mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @chriswnews: Plenty of extra security eyes outside #Phoenix Islamic ctr w/ a protest planned here later. #12News http://t.co/xM4y4C0iWd
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ThePeoplesBacon Adelson = Hillary's oligarchs: Adelson's trained seals = Hillary @zappin_liberals @AaronMDellutri
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @zappin_liberals You geniuses forget that every trained seal Adelson bought for Bibi was also in office. @ThePeoplesBacon @AaronMDellutri
1hreplyretweetfavorite
September 2009
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930