More New York Republicans Providing Material Support to Terrorists

Speaking of material support for terrorism, David Cole uses the recent trip by Rudy Giuliani and others to suck up to the Mujaheddin-e Khalq (MEK) as an opportunity to explain the idiocy of the Holder versus Humanitarian Law Project SCOTUS verdict.

DID former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, Tom Ridge, a former homeland security secretary, and Frances Townsend, a former national security adviser, all commit a federal crime last month in Paris when they spoke in support of the Mujahedeen Khalq at a conference organized by the Iranian opposition group’s advocates? Free speech, right? Not necessarily.

The problem is that the United States government has labeled the Mujahedeen Khalq a “foreign terrorist organization,” making it a crime to provide it, directly or indirectly, with any material support. And, according to the Justice Department under Mr. Mukasey himself, as well as under the current attorney general, Eric Holder, material support includes not only cash and other tangible aid, but also speech coordinated with a “foreign terrorist organization” for its benefit. It is therefore a felony, the government has argued, to file an amicus brief on behalf of a “terrorist” group, to engage in public advocacy to challenge a group’s “terrorist” designation or even to encourage peaceful avenues for redress of grievances.

[snip]

But in June, the Supreme Court ruled against us, stating that all such speech could be prohibited, because it might indirectly support the group’s terrorist activity. Chief Justice John Roberts reasoned that a terrorist group might use human rights advocacy training to file harassing claims, that it might use peacemaking assistance as a cover while re-arming itself, and that such speech could contribute to the group’s “legitimacy,” and thus increase its ability to obtain support elsewhere that could be turned to terrorist ends.

Cole goes on to note the hypocrisy of the government, which has given exceptions for humanitarian purposes to corporations seeking to sell cigarettes, even while arguing NGOs cannot provide food and water.

Mind you, I’m actually with Cole: Rudy and Mukasey and Fran Fragos Townsend and Tom Ridge ought to be able to go make speeches sucking up to Iran’s version of Ahmad Chalabi (oops! I forgot that Chalabi was Iran’s!), a bunch of liars who have invented intelligence to try to justify war with Iran. That’s what Republicans do, after all: promote hucksters who can justify the next war.

But it’s really time for either some consistency in the way the government pursues its war on terror violent extremism, or an admission that the war on terror has disintegrated into a war on those who oppose US empire. The government is still investigating a bunch of peace activists for material support. And yet four prominent Republicans can offer the same kind of material support as the peace activists–but this time in service of war or US hegemony or oil–with no similar consequences?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to More New York Republicans Providing Material Support to Terrorists

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @janehamsher Next thing you're gonna tell me CIA was warned that invading Iraq would result in chaos. @onekade @FearDept
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JohnWMAnthony There was confusion abt which church it was, but several people briefed on the raid now. @iamcoreyevans
5mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Dear #Ferguson police: please look up the meaning of the word "sanctuary" in relation to churches and victims of oppression. Not just a bldg
7mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @jamiekilstein: So "looting" is ok when it's cops doing it to a church?
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Folks, of COURSE the cops were going to raid a Church. They're ticking off each part of the First Amendment systematically.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Well, sure. It was Chertoff. Selling "Homeland" Security. Of course it was looting. Can I rent you Keith Alexander next? @FearDept
17mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @OKnox: @aterkel Look, you're in a "First Amendment Area," he's in a "Second Amendment Area." What's so hard to understand?
24mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @aterkel: Note that the “go fuck yourself” cop was mostly waving the gun at media — it was right in front of the press area. #Ferguson
24mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV So now the Ayatollah has joined Egypt in trolling the US over #Ferguson. Time for president and governor to intervene, shut down cops.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @khamenei_ir: If US govt hadn't systematically ban its ppl from knowing the truth, movements like the 99% would've been formed in a larg…
27mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @elonjames: Churches. Places that have been SANCTUARIES for CENTURIES are being raided in an effort to stop any sort of resistance to th…
31mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV We'll get it right this time for sure! MT @APDiploWriter: WASHINGTON (AP) — Military weighs plan 2 send small no. additional troops 2 #Iraq.
36mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2011
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031