Chris Smith Opposes IRS Enforcement on Undeclared $$, But Supports IRS Enforcement on Undeclared Babies

Chris Smith co-sponsored HR 4, which would overturn the provision of health care reform that required all businesses to issue 1099 forms for goods and services in excess of $600. The whole point of the 1099 provision was designed to crack down on unreported business income. Given Smith’s support for overturning the provision, we have to assume that he opposes the use of IRS to track and police undeclared business income.

Yet Smith authored HR 3, which deputizes the IRS to police abortion funding.

In testimony to a House taxation subcommittee on Wednesday, Thomas Barthold, the chief of staff of the nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee, confirmed that one consequence of the Republicans’ “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” would be to turn IRS agents into abortion cops—that is, during an audit, they’d have to detemine, from evidence provided by the taxpayer, whether any tax benefit had been inappropriately used to pay for an abortion.

[snip]

“Were this to become law, people could end up in an audit, the subject of which could be abortion, rape, and incest,” says Christopher Bergin, the head of Tax Analysts, a nonpartisan, not-for-profit tax policy group. “If you pass the law like this, the IRS would be required to enforce it.”

No wonder our government has such a big deficit. Republicans want to alter our entire tax code to police wombs, but not pocketbooks.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Chris Smith Opposes IRS Enforcement on Undeclared $$, But Supports IRS Enforcement on Undeclared Babies

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @DevlinBarrett Does that mean they're just going to bury his concerns later, under the weight of others on the board?
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @DevlinBarrett: JusticeDept Backs Down in Fight With Judge Over Science Evidence - WSJ http://t.co/XNuMHj0aSy
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jesseberney How was it? I suspect that's what I'm going to be told is only thing short of multiple spot surgery soon @Atrios @LisaMcIntire
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong Usually means either that they are difficult to get along with or don't pay.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @davidcnswanson space between words are just same. one space each side. @ncweaver
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong Says they are probably not a good client!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RachelPerrone Right. She learned 10 years too late to make difference, b4 working way thru local school @ClinicEscort
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RachelPerrone I remember when I explained "need blind" to friend from grad school. She had no idea some schools would pay @ClinicEscort
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver CIA is not our evil. They are their own evil. They oustripped being our evil under Dulles and have only gotten further away.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver SHUSH. Stop giving the CIA all my tricks. @davidcnswanson
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian Perhaps not but FISC has approved order for 1A actions that enable others to break the law. @matthew_d_green
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver My guess is switching to cable system using proportional type would lose plausible deniability for losing cables @davidcnswanson
1hreplyretweetfavorite
March 2011
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031