Judge Questions Government’s Persecution of DADT Activists

I’m busy watching this hearing today (and trying to watch one that happened last week). It’s hard to watch two hearings at once!

But I didn’t want you think I was still celebrating St. Paddy’s Day, so for the moment I’ll direct you to this story, another example where DOJ is taking an unreasonable stance against democratic activists:

Just got a report from Paul Yandura who is at the Federal Court House where the arraignment is for the 13 DADT protesters. As reported yesterday, the protesters, who were arrested on November 15, 2010 in front of the White House, are facing tougher charges than usual for cases like this. The government’s lawyers intend to prosecute the 13 defendants for “violating the orders of a federal law enforcement officer,” which could result in jail time. This is the first time DADT protesters have been in federal court. The other defendants were processed for minor misdemeanors in DC’s court system.

At today’s arraignment, Mark Goldstone, the lawyer for the 13 protesters, explained to Federal Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola that the statute under which the defendants are being charged was unusual. He noted that it had not been used in recent past against people engaging in civil disobedience at the White House. For whatever reason, the government has decided to pursue the more serious criminal charges.

What happened next was surprising to those in the Courtroom. Judge Facciola got up out of his chair, while pacing, gave a speech about the history of the civil rights movement in the United States. He intimated that there were trumped up charges back in the 50s and 60s, too. And, he evoked the Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham case, Martin Luther King’s “letters from the Birmingham jail” and how civil rights protesters were often brought to court to face stricter charges. The judge clearly linked the protest over Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell to those earlier civil rights protests.

The Judge asked the government prosecutor a lot of questions, including why the government didn’t charge the protesters under the lesser crime of disorderly conduct.

You may remember Facciola from the White House email case, in which he ordered the White House to actually keep its emails.

I’m glad the Magistrate judges are pushing back against DOJ’s unreasonable positions.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Judge Questions Government’s Persecution of DADT Activists

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @HeidiOBrien8 I bet exactly the opposite.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @VBalasubramani @trabernlaw You guys have all the fun!
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @thegrugq: This is a massive clusterfuck of a terrorist network. This is what happens w/o professionals, or effective hierarchy https://…
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Realharampolice I'm a lit PhD who always believed imperfect works were the best, so I'll take it.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @msbellows Hope it works out. Can't be easy.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Realharampolice If there's a lot of new beautiful music I don't much care what else is in the vault.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Realharampolice Beautiful music?
6hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @GatorsSB: T6: @AmandaLorenz18 records her first-career GRAND SLAM! UF leads TAMU, 14-3. #Wow #GoGators https://t.co/IZIEm1OZo2
6hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @GatorsBB: That feeling when you hit two bombs in the ninth to win 5-4... #Gators 💣💣 https://t.co/oB60aC1OQj
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Urgh. That said, hard to see how Osweiller has not already shown up Nick Foles. #GoDevils! https://t.co/wFjXOJi3kl
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @dpottzzz Errr, just know which school will always dominate AZ collegiate football. It is written (as, apparently, basketball now is).
6hreplyretweetfavorite
March 2011
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031