Judge Questions Government’s Persecution of DADT Activists

I’m busy watching this hearing today (and trying to watch one that happened last week). It’s hard to watch two hearings at once!

But I didn’t want you think I was still celebrating St. Paddy’s Day, so for the moment I’ll direct you to this story, another example where DOJ is taking an unreasonable stance against democratic activists:

Just got a report from Paul Yandura who is at the Federal Court House where the arraignment is for the 13 DADT protesters. As reported yesterday, the protesters, who were arrested on November 15, 2010 in front of the White House, are facing tougher charges than usual for cases like this. The government’s lawyers intend to prosecute the 13 defendants for “violating the orders of a federal law enforcement officer,” which could result in jail time. This is the first time DADT protesters have been in federal court. The other defendants were processed for minor misdemeanors in DC’s court system.

At today’s arraignment, Mark Goldstone, the lawyer for the 13 protesters, explained to Federal Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola that the statute under which the defendants are being charged was unusual. He noted that it had not been used in recent past against people engaging in civil disobedience at the White House. For whatever reason, the government has decided to pursue the more serious criminal charges.

What happened next was surprising to those in the Courtroom. Judge Facciola got up out of his chair, while pacing, gave a speech about the history of the civil rights movement in the United States. He intimated that there were trumped up charges back in the 50s and 60s, too. And, he evoked the Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham case, Martin Luther King’s “letters from the Birmingham jail” and how civil rights protesters were often brought to court to face stricter charges. The judge clearly linked the protest over Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell to those earlier civil rights protests.

The Judge asked the government prosecutor a lot of questions, including why the government didn’t charge the protesters under the lesser crime of disorderly conduct.

You may remember Facciola from the White House email case, in which he ordered the White House to actually keep its emails.

I’m glad the Magistrate judges are pushing back against DOJ’s unreasonable positions.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Judge Questions Government’s Persecution of DADT Activists

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel How is a Freedom Center different fr USO?
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @AstroTerry: The Great Lakes- in one view. http://t.co/052qh89NiC
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Apparently @DonteStallworth is traveling through the 9 circles of Italy. Read a book about that in Great Books class.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jacklgoldsmith This would have been far better for people like Mohamed Mohamud, Liberty City Seven etc.
44mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel 5.5 years after US cluster bombs targeted Yemenis in al Majala US cluster bombs are targeting Yemenis again? We didn't learn last time?
52mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Which Jihadi camp has the best WiFi? https://t.co/cjOZEgLjBb
56mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @GottaLaff @CREDOMobile @TheJusticeDept You have to be kidding. Lynch's entire history is in covering big banister's asses. What a joke.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yvonnewingett @GeneralBrnovich @dougducey @maryjpitzl Of course, the agency that defends the state on liability is not exactly independent
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Like McCain "suspending his campaign", MD Gov Larry Hogan played a crass stunt in "moving his office to Baltimore". What's he accomplished?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jilliancyork Or maybe it is just another insulated idiot on CNN using semantics to downplay authoritarian police brutality.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sarasidnerCNN @deray You are arguing semantics in the face of unnecessary police brutality on citizens?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This is a great piece, and it is nice to hear Kurt Schmoke again. Not to mention he is spot on with his words: https://t.co/i4JRiVilcp
2hreplyretweetfavorite
March 2011
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031