Judge Questions Government’s Persecution of DADT Activists

I’m busy watching this hearing today (and trying to watch one that happened last week). It’s hard to watch two hearings at once!

But I didn’t want you think I was still celebrating St. Paddy’s Day, so for the moment I’ll direct you to this story, another example where DOJ is taking an unreasonable stance against democratic activists:

Just got a report from Paul Yandura who is at the Federal Court House where the arraignment is for the 13 DADT protesters. As reported yesterday, the protesters, who were arrested on November 15, 2010 in front of the White House, are facing tougher charges than usual for cases like this. The government’s lawyers intend to prosecute the 13 defendants for “violating the orders of a federal law enforcement officer,” which could result in jail time. This is the first time DADT protesters have been in federal court. The other defendants were processed for minor misdemeanors in DC’s court system.

At today’s arraignment, Mark Goldstone, the lawyer for the 13 protesters, explained to Federal Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola that the statute under which the defendants are being charged was unusual. He noted that it had not been used in recent past against people engaging in civil disobedience at the White House. For whatever reason, the government has decided to pursue the more serious criminal charges.

What happened next was surprising to those in the Courtroom. Judge Facciola got up out of his chair, while pacing, gave a speech about the history of the civil rights movement in the United States. He intimated that there were trumped up charges back in the 50s and 60s, too. And, he evoked the Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham case, Martin Luther King’s “letters from the Birmingham jail” and how civil rights protesters were often brought to court to face stricter charges. The judge clearly linked the protest over Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell to those earlier civil rights protests.

The Judge asked the government prosecutor a lot of questions, including why the government didn’t charge the protesters under the lesser crime of disorderly conduct.

You may remember Facciola from the White House email case, in which he ordered the White House to actually keep its emails.

I’m glad the Magistrate judges are pushing back against DOJ’s unreasonable positions.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Judge Questions Government’s Persecution of DADT Activists

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @onekade If you don't make that your avatar I will.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @BorderReporter: DEA operation in Colombia gone wrong: Police lose $20 million, prosecutor outs an informant leading to her kidnapping h…
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How can Amazon's margins be going down? They're in bed with the CIA now.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @steve_vladeck @wellsbennett Fair question, but they have kind of taken one now!
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ZackPohl Obviously, @onetoughnerd's outsourcing of prison contract created jobs: drug smugglers for the prisoners.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @FaizaPatelBCJ Not true. But that contractor deserves FAR more attention that it has gotten. Very bizarre little contractor.
31mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @snipeyhead: Your horoscope for the week! http://t.co/zHy4wSsPxM
36mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @BurritoBrosShit: See what just one marijuana cigarette can do? http://t.co/nPhh0jq8n9
38mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DaveRushton3 Oh, that's great! Using Canada in a Ted Cruz conspiracy. Just where he's least likely to look.
38mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DaveRushton3 I'm just trying to get ahead of the conspiracy mongering. It's a good one, don't you think?
43mreplyretweetfavorite
March 2011
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031