KSM Was Lying about OBL’s Location While Hiding the Courier Who Could Locate Him

I apologize for yet another post on why the torture apologists claims that torture got us Osama bin Laden are wrong.

The debate is now manipulating the question at issue, suggesting that the fact Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Faraj al-Libi provided tidbits (or, according to several reports, unconvincing denials) that led to OBL equates to us needing torture to get that intelligence. Particularly given that CIA used the denials of KSM and al-Libi as indications they were hiding something, it’s unclear why a denial without coercion would have served differently.

But there are two points that seem key in assessing the torture question. First, both KSM and al-Libi had critical intelligence they withheld under torture. KSM knew of Abu Ahmed’s trusted role and real name; al-Libi knew Abu Ahmed was OBL’s trusted courier and may have known of what became OBL’s compound.

And neither of them revealed that information to the CIA.

They waterboarded KSM 183 times in a month, and he either never got asked about couriers guarding OBL, or he avoided answering the question honestly. Had KSM revealed that detail, Bush might have gotten OBL 8 years ago.

And just as importantly, the whole time KSM was shielding Abu Ahmed’s true identity while being waterboarded, KSM was also lying to the CIA about where OBL was. When asked what things he lied about under torture at his 2007 CSRT hearing, KSM specifically said he first said he didn’t know of OBL’s whereabouts, and then confirmed false locations for him, in response to the torture.

President [of the Tribunal]: What I’m trying to get at is any statement that you made was it because of this treatment, to use your word, you claim torture. Do you make any statements because of that?

[snip]

KSM: I make up stories just location UBL. Where is he? I don’t know. Then he torture me. Then I said yes, he is in this area or this is al Qaida which I don’t him. I say no. They torture me.

So at the time when KSM was guarding crucial information about Abu Ahmed and with it OBL’s location, he was making shit up to get the torture to stop.

As I understand the torture apologists’ arguments, the whole point of it (aside from generating propaganda and making chicken hawks excited) is to get crucial intelligence quickly, to skip the laborious process of acquiring a mosaic of information and developing deep knowledge of an organization over years–that is, to skip the process that has now resulted in the death of OBL. But instead of skipping that step, we got denials and–in the case of KSM–disinformation. And only now, eight and six years later, we’re only now becoming aware of the intelligence these men had that would have led to OBL had our interrogation been more successful.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to KSM Was Lying about OBL’s Location While Hiding the Courier Who Could Locate Him

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @Popehat: .@ggreenwald My guess is that @chriscuomo knows less about the Constitution than the average Juggalo.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Popehat: Ass. You are a disgrace to Fordham Law School, which only admitted you because of your famous father. https://t.co/RWEYvCUGEs
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Kind of odd writing abt McConnell, douchebag trying to expand spying, 7 years after writing abt (Mike) McConnell, douchebag expanding spying
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Dymaxion Transparency: person spends months reading reports, boosters ignore what person discovers bc might slow push for more transparency
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Dymaxion Which is why I keep coming back to fact we're legislating on bill while IC sits on IG report abt that provision. Classic bad faith
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lib_ertarian_ And remember some sub-apps can be low margin even if appliance as whole is not. @matthew_d_green
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lib_ertarian_ At least in auto industry I can assure you that it's that move fr high to low margin apps that drives cheap @matthew_d_green
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lib_ertarian_ What's the margin on dishwashers? esp as production moving back to US? @matthew_d_green
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Dymaxion Not saying ending dragnet isn't laudable. Just that boosters are ignoring how useful USAF is for IC, weakening negotiating stance.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Dymaxion Dragnet! And transparency the IC will blow off.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Oh! Also forgot! Under new system, metadata will be shared FAR more broadly, plus agencies will do back door searches on it. @emptywheel
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel And make it easier to get expansive Internet collection quickly (which is majority of Section 215 orders) @emptywheel
26mreplyretweetfavorite