Sterling’s Graymail Attempt

As Josh Gerstein reported, back in June, Jeffrey Sterling asked the government for details about which parts of James Risen’s account of Merlin are true and which are false. His lawyers argue that Sterling cannot be guilty of disseminating national defense information if what he disseminated–as the government claims–was actually not true.

Now, at first glimpse, this seems to be a graymail attempt: an attempt to demand information from the government it will ultimately refuse to turn over.

In addition to details of the alleged operation, the defense is entitled to know if, as a result of the publication of State of War, the identity of Human Asset No. 1 was learned by any foreign power at all. It is entitled to know if because of the publication of State of War, the Iranians shelved plans to use the blue prints that they allegedly learned, due to the publication of State of War, were allegedly flawed. The defense is entitled to know if this “Rogue Operation,” as described by Mr. Risen, did help the Iranian nuclear program in any way.

Some of this information, after all, would be the information Risen’s sources would have been trying to get out in the first place; this is precisely the kind of information the government is trying to suppress by prosecuting this case. And the emphasis on whether Iran (or another country) learned this information from Risen’s book–or from the operation itself–would make for an interesting question (though I suspect the government would retreat to a claim they’ve made before: that part of the damage comes in letting other countries know about this op).

But I’m also interested in Sterling’s focus on expert witnesses: as of June 22, when this was filed, the government had not yet revealed to the defense what expert they would call to verify that this information was actually national defense information. I suspect part of what the defense is trying to do is force that issue–and in particular, learn whether that expert will be someone who was actually involved in the operation (and therefore could refute Sterling’s version of what happened) or someone else, who would rely on second-hand information.

At a minimum, it must allow the defense to challenge the accuracy of that testimony by confronting the witness called by the government with the truth of what actually occurred.

I hope to come back to this issue in the coming days.

just as interesting as this attempt to get more information on what the government claims happened with the Merlin program is the timing. At one level, it seems very late in the process, almost a second swipe at a Bill of Particulars (the government responded to the first one by giving Sterling the chapter of Risen’s book).

But remember that this filing also came before most of the filings on whether or not Risen will have to testify. I noted that in addition to everything else the government has said to support its subpoena of Risen, they also said he cannot protect a source who passed false information. Of course, they haven’t proven that, they’ve simply gotten a grand jury to buy off on that.

It seems the stakes on whether information Sterling allegedly provided Risen was true or not have gone up. But that seems to be precisely the kind of information the government will want to keep out of court.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

8 Responses to Sterling’s Graymail Attempt

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @brahmresnik @LarrySabato It always has been, despite flaky polls.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @maassive I do not think the deadline is the entire law. You also have to consider breadth and enforceability.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@GregMitch In a single series, Bumgarner doesn't even top Bob Gibson in 1967. May not beat Gibson overall either.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @SIGARHQ: Deeply troubled that ISAF classified summary of report that assesses Afghan security forces capabilities http://t.co/a2blhSrdVz
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Can someone explain why Mike Allen thinks McCain would get SASC, when Inhofe is Ranking? http://t.co/NKUm1X5zMB
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @armandodkos @emptywheel And, if other things equal, I don't relish Cornyn/Cruz over McConnell necessarily
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @armandodkos @emptywheel I'd be happy for McConnell to lose (think odds slim of that tho); just think such a loss doesn't change much.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @armandodkos Not true that it hurts on nothing else. Inhofe, Burr, in particular, concern me. @bmaz @sahilkapur
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Congratulations, "public," You're now just like China in DOD's eyes. http://t.co/t9Hjd221sQ Hackers too, but we already knew that.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @armandodkos @sahilkapur ...get deals cut if he wants them, or people that will never deal?
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @armandodkos @sahilkapur Would you rather have a Majority Leader that is at least capable of making deals+has discipline to...
21mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nickmartin She should be. Ebola is scary, but there is simply no factual basis as to her case. America needs to stiffen its spine a bit.
22mreplyretweetfavorite
July 2011
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31