Obama’s Efforts to Create Korean–Not American–Jobs Gets More Cynical

As I noted this morning, Obama plans to “pivot to jobs” by creating them in Korea. (This video came from his statement today after the deficit ceiling bill got through.)

But his call on Congress to pass trade deals with Korea, Panama, and Colombia just got even more cynical.

First, because he says these deals will “help displaced workers looking for new jobs.” That word–displaced–is often used to refer to those who have lost their manufacturing jobs because they got sent to, say, Mexico in an earlier trade deal. “Displaced” usually refers to just the kind of people devastated by these trade deals. It seems Obama is pretending that new trade deals will create jobs for the people who lost their jobs because of earlier trade deals. But of course, last we heard, the folks who just successfully held our economy hostage were refusing to pass these trade deals with Trade Adjustment Assistance attached. In other words, chances are good that if these trade deals pass, they’ll pass with nothing to help those who are displaced because of it.

And note Obama’s promise to export “products stamped, ‘Made in America’.” Aside from the fact that a lot of what we’ll be exporting will be American-style fraudulent finance, not manufactured goods, his use of the term is all the more cynical given the likely reason he used it: because of the polling showing near unanimity that the US should make things again–like the 94% of Americans polled who think creating manufacturing jobs here in America is important.That is, he’s trying to co-opt the almost complete opposition to this policy–which almost certainly wouldn’t create any new manufacturing jobs here in the US–as a way to try to claim that trade deals that will result in a net loss of jobs will instead create them.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

32 Responses to Obama’s Efforts to Create Korean–Not American–Jobs Gets More Cynical

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom I'm REALLY sorry if I'm not obsessed with making Snowden scapegoat for other failures. That I won't do. That's your schtick.
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom The answer is if you're serious abt fighting ISIL you'd do well to focus on the things that helped ISIL far more.
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom You BADLY want Snowden to be the one thing that helped ISIL when if he did, he is so far down the list as to be distraction.
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom I believe I've answered that ~5 times now. With WAY too much complexity for you, I know. But sorry, you'll get same answer.
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom Thanks for admitting! It would help you move beyond it if you didn't misstate what I said and overgeneralize what Morrell did.
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom Yes. Apparently you are. Bc you keep misstating both what morrell said and what I said. It's pretty lame, actually.
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom Morrell's claim was more specific than that, or don't you care? @robertcaruso
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom This is about 5th time you've misrepresented that. Bc you have SUCH A DESIRE, provenance nothwithstanding, to have this.
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom No. I was ONLY ever talking abt Morrell's claim, bc PRB approval. Then YOU claimed I was saying more. @robertcaruso
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom And I find those SPECIFIC claims laughable, bc ISIL already had many routes to know that. @robertcaruso
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom May have been. but whatever it did is far less than Morrell himself had role in. So that may influence claims @robertcaruso
emptywheel @RadioFreeTom Look. I strongly believe CIA fucking up Syria under Morrell was far more useful for ISIL. @robertcaruso
August 2011
« Jul   Sep »