Obama’s Re-Election Campaign: Destroying the Country to Save It

Much of the discussion about this Jeff Zeleny piece has focused on Obama’s apparent consideration of cutting regulations that “affect the economy.”

The president intends to offer at least some progressive proposals to help regain a fighting posture that he has not had since the health care debate, but a provision is also being discussed to place a new moratorium on some regulations that affect the economy, excluding health care and financial rules. The proposals are likely to infuriate an already unhappy Democratic base. [my emphasis]

Greg Sargent suggests we ought to wait to see precisely what Obama means by this; I agree, not because I have any faith in Obama, but because the syntax of this line is so strange. Does Zeleny mean “moratorium on new regulations”? A “moratorium–does that mean temporary or permanent–on existing regulations”? Who is doing the discussing here, Mr. Passive Voice Journalist?

In short, I think Zeleny has failed his job as stenographer.

Which is why I’m even more intrigued by this passage.

The Republican candidates, collectively and in distinctive ways, continue to cast him as the foil against whom they ran so successfully in 2010: a big-government liberal who has expanded regulations, created uncertainty for business and failed to revive the economy, with millions more Americans out of work than when he took office. They portray him as an unsteady leader who is unequipped to turn around a country in economic crisis. [my emphasis]

Again, the meaning here is unclear: Who is the “they” here? Does Zeleny mean to invoke the themes all Republicans used to run against Obama in 2010? Or just the ones running for President. I’m not sure Ron Paul “ran against” Obama in 2010, though Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry did. Both complained about health insurance reform, but largely in terms of “freedom” and (particularly in the case of Perry the separatist, state’s rights), not regulations. Perry complained about emissions restrictions, which is certainly a regulation, but Obama’s already caved on that front.

Both Bachmann and Perry got caught hypocritically replying on government pork while attacking Obama’s stimulus bill, and it’s fair to say that Perry used stimulus funds to balance TX’s budget, and given the number of government jobs TX has relied on, it’s therefore safe to say Obama’s stimulus created jobs Perry is taking credit for.

And both Bachmann and Perry called Obama a socialist.

But the theme ignores one of the big things Republicans, as a whole, ran against Obama on in 2010: “cutting Medicare” (in the health insurance reform).

Which makes me wonder whether this interpretation of the 2010 election is Zeleny’s … or the Obama team’s?

It seems a critical issue because some seems to have simplified the reasons for the Democrats’ shellacking in 2010, particularly given that voters still largely blamed Bush for the economy in 2010 (though they’re doing so less now).

In any case, if Obama thinks he can embrace policies that will stop two fools who called a President who has coddled banksters “a socialist” from repeating that claim–if Obama believes that spoiling our air and water will make Bachmann and Perry be nice to him–it’s simply not going to work.

But I do worry that’s what he has in store.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

13 Responses to Obama’s Re-Election Campaign: Destroying the Country to Save It

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Imagine if Admin wanted to kill US ISIS member. They'd throw wall-splat of Awlaki memos w/wall-splat of IS war memos http://t.co/kg5njzG26r
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @bmaz Kiki says "come visit me!" http://t.co/6t88fTyVIi
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel And then replaced by Condi. RT @shrubfree: no, [Goodell]'d be appointed viceroy of baghdad. #ageoffail
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel If Goodell were to lose non-profit status AND Anheuser-Busch, THEN would he get fired?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Yes. Both true. @lynch_jen
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Coming to believe you and I are assholes. That can't be true. Can it?
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I joked a week ago but, seriously, why has no one written abt what it would do for soul of The City to lose the visible land of Adam Smith?
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Jeff Bezos, space start-up. https://t.co/V6bT5ZEQhM We have drones, space, CIA, WaPo, & country's biggest book store. What could go wrong?
25mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Why are you tweeting instead of throwing the damn ball? RT @michaelwhitney: Here is my dog http://t.co/plPvYxACM4
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel First @jricole http://t.co/hTf9qa4rnR & now @bungdan http://t.co/wRHuG8IVYH making lists of contradictions w/in Obama IS strategy.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mgsledge Yes. Because no one is reporting the content of the letter. Important to make it clear Clapper will gut intent of advocate.
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@matthewstoller calls 4 "Unwinding classfed state, beginning adult convo put off for 70 yrs abt nature of US power" https://t.co/k4MI1U87Ko
34mreplyretweetfavorite
September 2011
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930