Obama’s Re-Election Campaign: Destroying the Country to Save It

Much of the discussion about this Jeff Zeleny piece has focused on Obama’s apparent consideration of cutting regulations that “affect the economy.”

The president intends to offer at least some progressive proposals to help regain a fighting posture that he has not had since the health care debate, but a provision is also being discussed to place a new moratorium on some regulations that affect the economy, excluding health care and financial rules. The proposals are likely to infuriate an already unhappy Democratic base. [my emphasis]

Greg Sargent suggests we ought to wait to see precisely what Obama means by this; I agree, not because I have any faith in Obama, but because the syntax of this line is so strange. Does Zeleny mean “moratorium on new regulations”? A “moratorium–does that mean temporary or permanent–on existing regulations”? Who is doing the discussing here, Mr. Passive Voice Journalist?

In short, I think Zeleny has failed his job as stenographer.

Which is why I’m even more intrigued by this passage.

The Republican candidates, collectively and in distinctive ways, continue to cast him as the foil against whom they ran so successfully in 2010: a big-government liberal who has expanded regulations, created uncertainty for business and failed to revive the economy, with millions more Americans out of work than when he took office. They portray him as an unsteady leader who is unequipped to turn around a country in economic crisis. [my emphasis]

Again, the meaning here is unclear: Who is the “they” here? Does Zeleny mean to invoke the themes all Republicans used to run against Obama in 2010? Or just the ones running for President. I’m not sure Ron Paul “ran against” Obama in 2010, though Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry did. Both complained about health insurance reform, but largely in terms of “freedom” and (particularly in the case of Perry the separatist, state’s rights), not regulations. Perry complained about emissions restrictions, which is certainly a regulation, but Obama’s already caved on that front.

Both Bachmann and Perry got caught hypocritically replying on government pork while attacking Obama’s stimulus bill, and it’s fair to say that Perry used stimulus funds to balance TX’s budget, and given the number of government jobs TX has relied on, it’s therefore safe to say Obama’s stimulus created jobs Perry is taking credit for.

And both Bachmann and Perry called Obama a socialist.

But the theme ignores one of the big things Republicans, as a whole, ran against Obama on in 2010: “cutting Medicare” (in the health insurance reform).

Which makes me wonder whether this interpretation of the 2010 election is Zeleny’s … or the Obama team’s?

It seems a critical issue because some seems to have simplified the reasons for the Democrats’ shellacking in 2010, particularly given that voters still largely blamed Bush for the economy in 2010 (though they’re doing so less now).

In any case, if Obama thinks he can embrace policies that will stop two fools who called a President who has coddled banksters “a socialist” from repeating that claim–if Obama believes that spoiling our air and water will make Bachmann and Perry be nice to him–it’s simply not going to work.

But I do worry that’s what he has in store.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

13 Responses to Obama’s Re-Election Campaign: Destroying the Country to Save It

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @smsaideman "Showed"? You still don't? How in god's name do they respond?
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Duck and Cover: How the Greatest Generation™ trained their kids to withstand danger. https://t.co/eV4yIcRQBA
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DemFromCT Sure. But they never told the kids about the ass-goodbye-kissing.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @fak3r I was always a duck and cover skeptic. Tho by that point it was largely a habit leftover from finer days. When America was Great...
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "Just hide under your desk, Joey. Neither Trump nor Russia's nuclear missiles will get you there. Promise." https://t.co/bohBHn4jj3
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel For you young 'uns, "Duck & cover" is what schools used to do to assure kids they could withstand nuclear holocaust. https://t.co/O5WqE1ib0R
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Imagine how much more fun "The 70 GOPers playing duck & cover in response to Trump nomination" would be as headline? https://t.co/OXIkk7mXuN
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I suppose the NYT did not consider list of which GOPers are cowering under their beds news? https://t.co/586N9dxvOw https://t.co/oXc7IOEBcP
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @taylormattd If it were in the underlying Fox article, I might. But it's in a derivative piece, just like your multiple erroneous tweets.
57mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @CultofNewMedia @JasonLeopold @laRosalind Yeah, this guy is Rambo. It's either going to work or completely self destruct. Not sure which.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @djsziff @ddayen The Govt buggered it though. And climate changed as to jury pools. Is bullshit if Govt thought that precluded other cases.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
September 2011
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930