How Can Samir Khan Be “Collateral Damage” If OLC Memo Restricted Civilian Death?

Here’s the 32nd of 33 paragraphs in a Charlie Savage story describing the state secrets-protected explanation that justifies the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki.

The memorandum did assert that other limitations on the use of force under the laws of war — like avoiding the use of disproportionate force that would increase the possibility of civilian deaths — would constrain any operation against Mr. Awlaki.

That is, among the other restrictions on the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki, the memo also said the government had to make efforts to avoid “civilian deaths.”

You know? Civilians? Like Samir Khan, the other American citizen killed in the strike? A propagandist, but not–according to any claim–an operational terrorist?

Yet in spite of the fact they had been following Awlaki for weeks–presumably gathering a good deal of detail in the process–they still killed him in such a way that they didn’t avoid killing an American citizen.

As Savage describes, the memo also says they can only kill someone like Awlaki if they can’t take him alive. But we’ve already seen a stream of articles saying the government simply avoids capture now because it’s … well … inconvenient. Did the David Barron memo prohibit the killing of Americans if capture was inconvenient?

Two more important details of this. First, as seemingly always happens, OLC simply trusted the Executive Branch agency to give it credible intelligence.

The memorandum, which was written more than a year before Mr. Awlaki was killed, does not independently analyze the quality of the evidence against him.

I presume the memo says, “you’ve given us this information; if it proves to be otherwise, our advice might be different.”

And then there’s the timing:

December 24, 2009: Administration tries unsuccessfully to kill Awlaki as collateral damage

Before January 26, 2010: Awlaki may or may not be placed on CIA (or JSOC) kill list

April 2010: Awlaki put on kill list

June 2010: OLC opinion authorizing Awlaki assassination

June 2010: David Barron announces his departure

July 2010: Marty Lederman announces his departure

August 2010: ACLU and CCR sue on Awlaki targeting

September 2010: Administration considers charging Awlaki

September 2010: After not charging Awlaki, the government declares the material just leaked to Charlie Savage a state secret

April 2011: The Administration tries, but fails, to kill Awlaki

September 2011: The Administration assassinates Awlaki and Khan

In other words–as Savage suggests–they had Awlaki on the kill list before they had actually done the review whether or not he should be there.

I can see why I’d want to leave the department if that had happened to me in OLC.

Twitter10Reddit0Facebook19Google+2Email

89 Responses to How Can Samir Khan Be “Collateral Damage” If OLC Memo Restricted Civilian Death?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @onekade Also, stay outta my way bc I'm about 10 minutes away from a serious road rage incident.
45sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HanniFakhoury @NateWessler Michael Horowitz trying to investigate Hemisphere, also complaining abt grand jury info. http://t.co/6eepobqvt4
7mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel He just comes off as the typical @_FloridaMan
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @thepoettrap @benjaminwittes This is just too stupid to continue. Good luck in you further pursuits!
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Popehat I love the piece for that. I only wish @JasonLeopold had quoted him saying "GET OFF MY LAWN!"
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @thepoettrap @benjaminwittes Well, aren't you cute. No, my disingenuous friend, I was the one who objected to the other person's tripe.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @emptywheel: Shorter James Mitchell: I'm kind of dipshit who bitches abt ObamaCare & Global Warming Hoax & I say torture works. http://t…
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Shorter James Mitchell: I'm kind of dipshit who bitches abt ObamaCare & Global Warming Hoax & I say torture works. http://t.co/oTR69zpTLf
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Hahahaha! Torturer James Mitchell uses interview to call ObamaCare a shit sandwich. http://t.co/oTR69zpTLf
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is DOJ's control over IG's access to grand jury info slowing his investigation of DEA's parallel construction? http://t.co/6eepobqvt4
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel DOJ Inspector General Investigating DEA’s Use of Parallel Construction under Hemisphere http://t.co/0FrmQklvw8
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @thepoettrap Seriously, I can fathom disagreement (I am sure Ben+I have it here) but "makes no sense" seems a bit obtuse @benjaminwittes
23mreplyretweetfavorite
October 2011
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031