Ben Bernanke Prepares to Rob My Mom

My mom’s pretty stubborn (I come by it naturally). So in spite of the fact that I have been warning her to move her primary banking out of Bank of America into a solvent bank for over a year, she has yet to do so.

Which is why I’m so troubled that Bank of America is about to use my mom’s savings to back its derivatives counterparties.

Bank of America Corp. (BAC), hit by a credit downgrade last month, has moved derivatives from its Merrill Lynch unit to a subsidiary flush with insured deposits, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. disagree over the transfers, which are being requested by counterparties, said the people, who asked to remain anonymous because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly. The Fed has signaled that it favors moving the derivatives to give relief to the bank holding company, while the FDIC, which would have to pay off depositors in the event of a bank failure, is objecting, said the people. The bank doesn’t believe regulatory approval is needed, said people with knowledge of its position.

Money’s fungible, right? That’s what the anti-choice people say, anyway. So what’s the big deal that BoA has taken Merrill Lynch’s exposure to the European mess and put that risk where mom keeps her retirement? Yves Smith explains. First, this will make it all-but-impossible to unwind Bank of America when it goes under without disrupting the personal accounts of people like my mom. Significantly, if those derivatives pay off (for example, if Greece defaults) or require more collateral (because BoA gets downgraded again), then counterparties would get their money before mom does.

The reason that commentators like Chris Whalen were relatively sanguine about Bank of America likely becoming insolvent as a result of eventual mortgage and other litigation losses is that it would be a holding company bankruptcy. The operating units, most importantly, the banks, would not be affected and could be spun out to a new entity or sold. Shareholders would be wiped out and holding company creditors (most important, bondholders) would take a hit by having their debt haircut and partly converted to equity.

This changes the picture completely. This move reflects either criminal incompetence or abject corruption by the Fed. Even though I’ve expressed my doubts as to whether Dodd Frank resolutions will work, dumping derivatives into depositaries pretty much guarantees a Dodd Frank resolution will fail. Remember the effect of the 2005 bankruptcy law revisions: derivatives counterparties are first in line, they get to grab assets first and leave everyone else to scramble for crumbs. So this move amounts to a direct transfer from derivatives counterparties of Merrill to the taxpayer, via the FDIC, which would have to make depositors whole after derivatives counterparties grabbed collateral. It’s well nigh impossible to have an orderly wind down in this scenario. You have a derivatives counterparty land grab and an abrupt insolvency. Lehman failed over a weekend after JP Morgan grabbed collateral. [Yves’ emphasis]

As Yves points out, this will quickly result in the depletion of FDIC’s deposit insurance to pay my mom back for the money the banksters snatched. She suggests that Congress will quickly vote to fund the Treasury so it can pay my mom–and millions of other Americans–to replace their insured funds.

But it’s even worse than that. During the savings & loan crisis, the FDIC did not have enough in deposit insurance receipts to pay for the Resolution Trust Corporation wind-down vehicle. It had to get more funding from Congress. This move paves the way for another TARP-style shakedown of taxpayers, this time to save depositors. No Congressman would dare vote against that. This move is Machiavellian, and just plain evil.

She’s probably right that even the most Do-Nothing Congress in American history will eventually fund Treasury. I’m just not convinced it’ll happen quickly, or without some really big hostages demanded, first.

Now, mom’s in pretty decent shape for a retiree–between some pensions and other retirement funds, she could wait out the Do-Nothing Congress. And heck, I’m even willing to lend mom a few bob, even if she is so stubborn.

But most Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, and millions of them depend on what they’ve got deposited in Bank of America. It seems to me that Ben Bernanke has just unilaterally decided to make those BoA depositers lend banksters their life savings until such time as the Do-Nothing Congress gets around to fixing what are, as we speak, foreseeable and unacceptable consequences of this move.

Update: Jeebus I had a lot of typos in this. I hope I’ve gotten them all.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

47 Responses to Ben Bernanke Prepares to Rob My Mom

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel If a Bitcoin-DEA crook issued fake NSLs, would anyone ever learn of it?
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JZdziarski As are tweets, as the Defense already demonstrated here. (Tho they could be ironic, which is even dicier) @JimArmstrongWBZ
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JZdziarski Certainly prosecutors all over the country make much of searches and even, in this case, tweets @JimArmstrongWBZ
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JasonLeopold: Poland says sought U.S. assurances over Guantanamo inmate http://t.co/PMVCiB8qlj
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel That works. RT @epmurph: sandtrap
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Mike Pence is a lying twit who makes Jan Brewer look honest and intelligent by comparison. Way to go Indiana.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Shouldn't there be a word for "quagmire" used in most-arid countries?
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Defense attorneys are going to have to start calling Aloke Chakravarty as a witness, bc according to his claims thousands are innocent.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JimArmstrongWBZ: C: no matter what files are where, you can't tell what someone was thinking, right? that's beyond computer forensics? …
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Yesterday, after claiming AT&T never knows where your phone is, prosecutor claims you never know who is using computer, even w/log in. Huh.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JimArmstrongWBZ: Chakravarty: You can't tell who is using a computer at any given time, right? Spencer: Generally speaking, that's fair…
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JimArmstrongWBZ: Correcting earlier tweet: @JimArmstrongWBZ: Spencer: The "Complete Inspire" PDF first appears on Tamerlan's laptop on …
36mreplyretweetfavorite
October 2011
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031