If the Only News Is Good News and There Is No News …?

Tara McKelvey, the woman who wrote one of the most detailed stories on drone targeting (which has subsequently gotten John Rizzo into some trouble), has a CJR piece on the problems of reporting on drones. The whole thing is worth reading, but I want to take a number of quotes McKelvey includes out of order, starting with David Ignatius, noting the Administration’s flexibility in secrecy rules.

Ignatius, of the Post, explained that Obama administration officials are sometimes willing to discuss drone operations in an attempt to promote the White House’s counterterrorism strategy. In February 2010, for instance, Ignatius was able to write a detailed account of the escalation of drone strikes because officials were eager to demonstrate that Obama was more aggressive in his pursuit of al Qaeda than Bush was.

“These rules about covert activities can be bent when it becomes politically advantageous,” Ignatius said. “When it suits them, you get quite a detailed readout.”

That’s a sentiment Jonathan Landay echoes.

Journalists know that finding non-official sources is crucial in covering the drone war, especially under the tight-lipped Obama administration. “The only time I’m allowed to talk to senior staff or the nsc is for stories that make the administration look good,” McClatchy’s Landay said.

In other words, an experienced journalist reputed to be a mouthpiece, and an experienced journalists known for bucking the Administration propaganda leading up to the Iraq War. Both in agreement that the Administration won’t tell you anything unless it puts the Administration and its drone program in the best light.

Which is why I love this bit, which McKelvey puts right after a discussion about the clouded legality of the program.

A spokesman for the White House National Security Council, who spoke only on condition he not be named, rebuffed questions about why the administration refuses to speak with reporters on the record about the program. “You’re going to have a lot of people on the outside, and they all love to talk,” he said. “We can’t do that.” And, the official added, if outsiders are talking about the drone war, “that means they don’t know very much.”

This NSC spokesperson may or may not be Tommy Vietor, who is, after all, the NSC spokesperson.

For McKelvey, this Tommy Vietor sound-alike basically claims he cannot comment. Both Ignatius (who ought to know) and Landay make it clear they would have comment if there were good news to share.

Which further adds to the evidence that where they refuse to give us evidence–as they have with Anwar al-Awlaki’s assassination–it’s because they have no good news to give.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

34 Responses to If the Only News Is Good News and There Is No News …?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @WerlySportsLaw: .@bmaz @Prof_Holland @WALLACHLEGAL @RMFifthCircuit @IanPGunn @amilst44 we bet thousands of dollars on this right? #payup
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Y'all might want to mute me until I'm done tweeting every time Berman mocks NFL's claims of independence. http://t.co/Hlj6TsXf8K
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @WerlySportsLaw @Prof_Holland @WALLACHLEGAL @RMFifthCircuit @IanPGunn @amilst44 Just waiting to collect. Hopefully from those mopes at @ESPN
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Berman mocking NFL claims of "Independent" investigation again. http://t.co/6qFRaJdYOT
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @EdgeofSports Don't think that's true. NFL HAS broad authority there. They just keep far overstepping it.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Shorter Judge Berman: The NFL seems to have a flexible notion of what "independent" means. http://t.co/nSY7eVTwum
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @WerlySportsLaw: Court finds that no player that had "general awareness" of ball deflation had notice. #BOLD http://t.co/TAsO2M9JKa
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Now that we've Freed Tom Brady, can we also Free RGIII?
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @IanPGunn: As @WALLACHLEGAL and I said when we reviewed oral argument transcript, Berman's questioning wasn't devil's advocate.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Remember, Goodell did all this to defend integrity of the game. Cf that team from Washington.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Been saying this for years, but it"s once again established that @ESPN's Lester Munson is a dope+doesn't know squat about law in real courts
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Berman really harped on this in hearings: Turns out Brady plays better with big balls. http://t.co/R1KNW2Fuar
24mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2012
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031