Dianne Feinstein Complains about Executive Branch Blabbing

In her statement at the beginning of the Threat Intelligence Assessment hearing today, Dianne Feinstein complained that the Executive Branch continues to blab about things that are supposed to be secret (this starts around 11:00).

I’d also like to say that once again this committee has been put in a difficult position of trying to avoid any mention of classified matters when various parts of the executive branch may be doing somewhat the opposite. I ask members to be careful in their questions and statements and to remember that public discussion of some intelligence programs and assets can lead to them being compromised.

On the particular issue of drone strikes, I will only say that I was cleared to say in our joint hearing with the House Intelligence Committee last September “And there’s no issue that receives more attention and oversight from this Committee than the United States Counterterrorism efforts going on along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. These efforts are extremely precise and carefully executed and are the most effective tools we have. Non-combatant casualties are kept to an absolute minimum.”

Given the timing, given her references to both assets and programs, and given her comments about the drone strikes on the Pakistani border, I assume she’s complaining about Leon Panetta’s blabbing to 60 Minutes the other night. (Plus, DiFi and Panetta have had their difficulties in the past.)

You see? It’s not just me that is fed up with this double standard on secrecy.

Update: Josh Gerstein talked to DiFi after the hearing, and she made it clear she was not criticizing the President.

Feinstein insisted after Tuesday’s hearing that her remarks were not aimed at Obama.

“I was not criticizing the president.  I was reminding the committee about protecting classified information,” she said in a statement e-mailed to POLITICO. She did not elaborate on what “parts of the executive branch” she was referring to in her public comments earlier in the day. A spokesman had no immediate response to a request for clarification.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

8 Responses to Dianne Feinstein Complains about Executive Branch Blabbing

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Millicentsomer Lili, have another glass of wine, there is no bottom to the hole you just jumped in.
58mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhoenixWomanMN @armandodkos In fact, I was much more favorable to HRC in primary until I saw how dishonest and petty her team is.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhoenixWomanMN @armandodkos I do NOT hate Clinton, I admire her in very many ways. Think some of her policies are atrocious+prefer Sanders.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhoenixWomanMN @armandodkos Perhaps I mistook you for someone else. But you can flat out stick your trite little CDS shit.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhoenixWomanMN @armandodkos This is the same asinine horseshit you pulled in 2008. well you can fuck right off with that.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @richganske That RAF bar is pretty awesome looking
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @shannynmoore No kidding. Just saw someone compare them to INXS. Not seeing that in the least.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ZoeNoeTek Yep, you too.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhoenixWomanMN @armandodkos Team Clinton can stick that shit. Why don't you account for the hundreds of thousands dead from her sick wars?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ZoeNoeTek No. Frankly anybody that would want the job of President is probably the wrong person to have it.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhoenixWomanMN @armandodkos Like I give a flying fuck about Devine? Seriously spare me this two bit Clintonian horseshoe.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ZoeNoeTek Heh, you mean like having Bill Gates clean up the internet?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2012
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031