Dianne Feinstein Complains about Executive Branch Blabbing

In her statement at the beginning of the Threat Intelligence Assessment hearing today, Dianne Feinstein complained that the Executive Branch continues to blab about things that are supposed to be secret (this starts around 11:00).

I’d also like to say that once again this committee has been put in a difficult position of trying to avoid any mention of classified matters when various parts of the executive branch may be doing somewhat the opposite. I ask members to be careful in their questions and statements and to remember that public discussion of some intelligence programs and assets can lead to them being compromised.

On the particular issue of drone strikes, I will only say that I was cleared to say in our joint hearing with the House Intelligence Committee last September “And there’s no issue that receives more attention and oversight from this Committee than the United States Counterterrorism efforts going on along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. These efforts are extremely precise and carefully executed and are the most effective tools we have. Non-combatant casualties are kept to an absolute minimum.”

Given the timing, given her references to both assets and programs, and given her comments about the drone strikes on the Pakistani border, I assume she’s complaining about Leon Panetta’s blabbing to 60 Minutes the other night. (Plus, DiFi and Panetta have had their difficulties in the past.)

You see? It’s not just me that is fed up with this double standard on secrecy.

Update: Josh Gerstein talked to DiFi after the hearing, and she made it clear she was not criticizing the President.

Feinstein insisted after Tuesday’s hearing that her remarks were not aimed at Obama.

“I was not criticizing the president.  I was reminding the committee about protecting classified information,” she said in a statement e-mailed to POLITICO. She did not elaborate on what “parts of the executive branch” she was referring to in her public comments earlier in the day. A spokesman had no immediate response to a request for clarification.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

8 Responses to Dianne Feinstein Complains about Executive Branch Blabbing

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz Hat's off to @StephStradley for giving a nice looking couple seats to the Texans game. #NiceWork https://t.co/yXLET7fE4e
emptywheel @nickmanes1 I still don't understand how Eli's contract didn't include a clause giving OBJ bonus for every circus catch making him look good
bmaz Oh, that may leave a mark. https://t.co/PVQE2g3U6P
emptywheel @miishke U Mich. He was there for a semester in 1999.
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Ut oh. Just got back. Picks on top of picks?
bmaz @StephStradley [Shaking my fist in the direction of Houston] Dangit!
emptywheel @miishke You mean for ongoing work? Dunno that Borges useful. Just familiar! @ErrataRob
emptywheel @ThusBloggedA Who better than a Kitties-Pats fan?
emptywheel @yoshiofor It had to be. Encryption is apparently the only reason why authorities miss terrorists.
emptywheel @hypervisible Well, good, you just made me feel better about taking pleasure in Suh doing less well than expected.
emptywheel @hypervisible I did not. Thanks.
emptywheel I hate taking great pleasure out of Suh's less than stellar season at the Fins. But I do.
January 2012
« Dec   Feb »