Short Sale at the White House?

I haven’t had much time to cover the ins and outs of the foreclosure settlement, which has been genuinely imminent for two weeks, but which is faltering now on banks’ refusal to be sued for anything. My guess is that Eric Schneiderman’s indefinite delay of his presumed announcement that he was joining the settlement last night means he had demonstrated the banks weren’t serious about how narrow they claimed the release to be.

That said, I found this to be a rather interesting article. It confirms what was obvious when they held a meeting in Chicago a few weeks back: this settlement is now the White House’s baby.

The White House has quietly injected itself into ongoing settlement discussions aimed at resolving regulators’ allegations that leading US banks abused struggling homeowners, underscoring the deal’s potential impact on the broader housing market and the presidential election.

Aides to President Barack Obama have in recent weeks courted civil rights groups and borrower advocacy organisations, scheduling meetings and calls in an attempt to gain support for the expected settlement and muffle criticism from key political allies.

Now, one of the aides named in the story is Jon Carson, director of the White House’s office of public engagement. It makes sense that he’d be the one to reach out to groups like NAACP and La Raza, as the story describes (It sounds like NAACP is much more willing to buy this sell than La Raza).

I also find it interesting that they’re reaching out though civil rights groups. That’s because–at least according to the way-too-optimistic release terms posted by Mike Lux–civil rights claims are at the top of the list of abuses not immunized with this settlement.

No release on any fair housing, fair lending, or civil rights claims.

Also, predatory subprime lending has been one of the few abuses actually investigated and, in a few cases, settled (albeit with inadequate payouts).

In addition to Carson, National Economic Council Chair Gene Sperling is the other White House aide named in the article. Granted, he had a big role in the auto bailout, so he has not limited himself to bank issues, but I found it notable in any case.

But here’s one question I’ve got about this article. It says that Sperling and Carson are sharing the terms of the deal.

In addition to sharing confidential details of the settlement terms, the White House has sought to alleviate advocates’ concerns that the liability release is too broad by detailing which legal claims would remain if a settlement were reached.

Really? These confidential details can be shared? Well then, why aren’t they being shared?

That Obama is sharing the purported details of the deal with certain groups is all the more alarming given that the AGs who have been working on this deal for over a year appear to have no idea of what the terms actually are.

In short, it’s not so much that I’m surprised the White House is running this show. It’s that this stinks to high hell of another asymmetrical info op, the kind they pull on national security all the time. By compartmenting information, they ensure people buy off on stuff they have a badly incomplete understanding of.

Look, if NGOs can have access to this information, than so can everyone, from taxpayers to the Attorneys General trying to hold banks accountable.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

19 Responses to Short Sale at the White House?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @OKnox Saudis have quidded their pro I suspect. @GerardAraud
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MichiganHist: In honor of Cesar Chavez Day- posts will be related to farm laborers this evening.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @YousefMunayyer A little horrified NYT wasn't more horrified.
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @AngieCoiro: Worth noting: five #Indiana #GOP voted AGAINST #rfra: http://t.co/5WjN3jSw1R One is actually consistent in his bid for "sma…
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @YousefMunayyer Tracks "language used"?!?!? You don't use Arabic, but that's now a sign of ISIS support?
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @kgosztola: "Protesting is not the same as making progress." Rahm Emanuel blunt about his view of community organizing #ChicagoTonight
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @IronCurtaiNYC They did not mention "or one of those US counties were people are too fucking stupid to innoculate their kids."
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Interesting. Oncologist reminder call includes a "if you've traveled to [Ebola countries] please contact us before" coming in.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @TylerCullis: Lots of hopes being realized by tonight's announcement of agreement in principle between US, its P5+1 partners, and Iran. …
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV And you can bet that Bibi now has his fabricators working overtime on "evidence" of Iran breaking the agreement...
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @LadaneNasseri: BREAKING: Russian FM says main elements of #IranDeal reached, agreement to be drafted in coming days #IranTalks #IranTal
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @toddzwillich We'll always have some "scary if true" left over for Sunnis.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829