Senate Judiciary Committee: Closing the Barn Door after the Barn’s Been Foreclosed

Sometime this week, the long-awaited terms for the foreclosure settlement will be released, giving banks immunity for much of the fraud and forgery they committed in the course of taking homeowners’ houses.

Which makes the timing of this hearing the Senate Judiciary Committee just announced beyond absurd.

“Examining Lending Discrimination Practices and Foreclosure Abuses”

Senate Judiciary Committee
Full Committee

DATE: March 7, 2012

A better time for such a hearing might have been December 2010, just as the full extent of the robosigning was being exposed. In fact, that’s the second-to-last hearing John Conyers hadbefore Dems lost their House majority. Since that time, he has been imploring the Administration and the Attorneys General to do something substantive about foreclosure problems, even asking MI’s AG not to sign onto the settlement.

But next week!?!?! Just as the settlement will be enacted, making many of these issues (though reportedly not civil rights issues) moot?!?! Really?!?!

I mean, if the Judiciary Committee is going to hold a hearing in the immediate future, it’d be far better to hold a hearing considering what impact it will have on justice in this country to assign a $2,000 price tag to fabricating forged documents or engaging in other fraudulent activities before a court. Will judges ever be able to trust corporations in their courtrooms again? Will private citizens have access to this $2,000 Get Out of Jail Free card, or only Too Big to Fail institutions?

Alternately, act like the bankster-owned body the Senate is, and simply call a hearing to discuss whether having pension funds pay to buy immunity for the banks hurts corporations.

And then there’s the witness list: right now, just Civil Rights Division head Thomas Perez will testify. I’m all in favor of Thomas Perez in most any role–his work at Civil Rights has easily been the best part of DOJ under Obama. But aren’t there other people who might better address foreclosure abuses, even if the hearing just focuses on lending discrimination?

I mean, I’m all in favor of someone finally conducting oversight over the fraud going on in this country. But this hearing couldn’t be more badly timed.


Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to Senate Judiciary Committee: Closing the Barn Door after the Barn’s Been Foreclosed

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @freespeechlover @emptywheel @CalFootball Yes, but Stanford has a real coach (Cal too probably) we have fucking Todd Graham.
JimWhiteGNV I used to think of @bmaz as my friend. Now, I just don't know...
bmaz Brady, Belichick and the Patriots. Doing work. To quote Frederich March in Bridges at Toko Ri, "Where do we find such men"?
emptywheel @onekade Another thing ISIS has in common with our far (and not-so-far) right: a desires for 10% taxes.
emptywheel @p2wy Try muting. Tho it didn't work for me when I tried to silence discussion of Harbaugh pre-season.
emptywheel @bmaz My apologies to Pat Tillman, who I have gravely slandered.
emptywheel @nittacci Do you know how easy it is to tackle a skinny 6'8" guy? Don't even have to bend your knees to get to his center of gravity.
bmaz What choo talking bout?? ASU has provides WAY more stars to NFL than that piddly UofA
emptywheel @nittacci Shorter. But bigger.
emptywheel Are there any non-Euro allies we have v ISIS that aren't either torturing them or assisting them? Bueller?
bmaz @Steplor Meh, sincerely all good!
emptywheel How many possible picks has Jones not caught this year? Guess he's been practicing...
February 2012
« Jan   Mar »