Poll: Do Men Realize Birth Control Is Rarely Just for “Female Employees”?

Greg Sargent tweeted the results of this CBS/NYT poll, showing that 37% of those polled believe the whole birth control debate is about religious freedom. While Sargent thinks 37% is a small number, given that it means that maybe a quarter of people polled (given that almost 100% of sexually active women have used birth control and most of them have used it because they were sleeping with men) both believe that birth control is a religious issue and have relied on birth control, I find it rather high.

 

 

But look at how the questions were asked:

At issue here is not just health insurance providing birth control for female employees. It is also about providing coverage for vasectomies (which accounts for 10% of birth control use). And providing coverage for the female spouses of male employees most of whom, presumably, are using that birth control because they are sleeping with their spouse.

There’s a lot of men having sex without babies that this health coverage enables.

And while I’ll grant you that the lack of availability of birth control disproportionately affects women (particularly with imperfect enforcement of child support and still pervasive gender roles about nurturing children), this is also about the ability of couples, together, to choose to have families of a size appropriate to their lifestyle and income.

I get that this is about women’s ability to choose autonomy. But it’s also about men’s ability to fuck and fuck and fuck. Somehow that last bit never gets polled.

Tweet about this on Twitter12Share on Reddit1Share on Facebook3Google+0Email to someone

25 Responses to Poll: Do Men Realize Birth Control Is Rarely Just for “Female Employees”?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @emptywheel: For 10 years some of America's purportedly top journos have been willingly using euphemism long since proven false, "enhanc…
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel For 10 years some of America's purportedly top journos have been willingly using euphemism long since proven false, "enhanced interrogation"
6mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Feels like it some days. RT @bmaz: @laRosalind @JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Honestly, I don't think Jim is that old.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @robertcaruso Dude, I respect you and all, but I live in AZ; I'm supposed to go to VA for decent tacos? #ComeOnMan
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @robertcaruso What? Where?? Tacos???
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Honestly, I don't think Jim is that old.
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AZ_Dream_Killer Wait a minute!! Did you get that pole cat avatar from me??
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel That has to stunt your brain after a while, just like Communist propaganda. It's an empty performance. "Critics say amounts to torture"
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I mean, what does it do to your brain if you have to keep repeating "human rights activists consider to be torture" for 10 years?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Bruins basketball has been underwater, and under Arizona Wildcats, for decades now. cc @AZ_Dream_Killer
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @NicoleOzer: City records we found revealed that San Jose recently purchased a drone with DHS funding http://t.co/Q5rxaWU8Hp
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @manish_vij And ends up using "enhanced interrogation." Wish that phrase would die.
26mreplyretweetfavorite