Poll: Do Men Realize Birth Control Is Rarely Just for “Female Employees”?

Greg Sargent tweeted the results of this CBS/NYT poll, showing that 37% of those polled believe the whole birth control debate is about religious freedom. While Sargent thinks 37% is a small number, given that it means that maybe a quarter of people polled (given that almost 100% of sexually active women have used birth control and most of them have used it because they were sleeping with men) both believe that birth control is a religious issue and have relied on birth control, I find it rather high.



But look at how the questions were asked:

At issue here is not just health insurance providing birth control for female employees. It is also about providing coverage for vasectomies (which accounts for 10% of birth control use). And providing coverage for the female spouses of male employees most of whom, presumably, are using that birth control because they are sleeping with their spouse.

There’s a lot of men having sex without babies that this health coverage enables.

And while I’ll grant you that the lack of availability of birth control disproportionately affects women (particularly with imperfect enforcement of child support and still pervasive gender roles about nurturing children), this is also about the ability of couples, together, to choose to have families of a size appropriate to their lifestyle and income.

I get that this is about women’s ability to choose autonomy. But it’s also about men’s ability to fuck and fuck and fuck. Somehow that last bit never gets polled.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

25 Responses to Poll: Do Men Realize Birth Control Is Rarely Just for “Female Employees”?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @JasonLeopold No. Facts don't matter, silly. @MikeEmanuelFox @RepMcCaul
emptywheel @charlie_savage Right. Tho Petraeus' motive (WTF was he thinking?!?!) still unclear. @benjaminwittes @joshgerstein @DefenseBaron
emptywheel @joshgerstein Tho if he had intent to publish but didn't succeed, another crime (cf Sterling) @DefenseBaron @charlie_savage
emptywheel @joshgerstein Retaining codeword intell, sharing it, publishing it, lying abt it. @DefenseBaron @charlie_savage
emptywheel @joshgerstein That's such pre-Kiriakou thinking. @DefenseBaron @charlie_savage
emptywheel @benjaminwittes No. I imagine it wasn't easy to write, I applaud you for doing so.
emptywheel @benjaminwittes Nice piece on Petraeus. But why is Kiriakou in any way distinct? Both very parallel: covert ID, no publication, accused lies
emptywheel @brettmaxkaufman Don't companies that have 702 setups have to sign NDAs (at least employees who manage that)?
emptywheel @krmaher We're not pointing out that Aspen Security Forum has made itself irrelevant? @just_security
emptywheel @kombiz No. No that's not. That's a golf course. Not even Fat Al Gore believes that's weather.
bmaz @actongriscom If she felt the evidence she was presented with did not warrant death, that is her prerogative. Period.
bmaz @actongriscom Yeah, I am wary that "refusing to deliberate" is just their overwrought code that she wouldn't change her vote.