White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler Vows Not to Let the White House Be Defeated by Actual Citizens

In an article describing how–in the guise of “flexibility”–the White House has continued the seeming relentless grab for unchecked executive power, White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler offers a terribly cynical explanation for the Administration’s asinine levels of secrecy regarding its drone strikes.

But in an interview, White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler acknowledged Mr. Obama has developed a broader view of executive power since he was a senator. In explaining the shift, she cited the nature of the office.

“Many issues that he deals with are just on him, where the Congress doesn’t bear the burden in the same way,” she said. “Until one experiences that first hand, it is difficult to appreciate fully how you need flexibility in a lot of circumstances.”

[snip]

Ms. Ruemmler said Mr. Obama tries to publicly explain his use of executive power, but says certain counterterrorism programs like the drone campaign are exceptions. Opening them to public scrutiny would be “self-defeating,” she said.

The WSJ doesn’t explain what she meant when invoking “self-defeat.” But her stance was described in a Daniel Klaidman article on the Administration’s decision, at a meeting in the Situation Room last November, to release more information about the targeted killing of Anwar al-Awlaki.

Another senior official expressing caution about the plan was Kathryn Ruemmler, the White House counsel. She cautioned that the disclosures could weaken the government’s stance in pending litigation. The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration under the Freedom of Information Act seeking the release of the Justice Department legal opinion in the Awlaki case. (The department has declined to provide the documents requested.)

That is, Ruemmler’s not making an argument about the efficacy of the drone strikes themselves; al Qaeda already knows who’s responsible for the arms raining down on their heads.

Rather, Ruemmler doesn’t want to be “defeated” by journalists, civil liberties organizations, and ordinary citizens seeking to at least understand, if not limit, executive power.

Kathy Ruemmler’s not waging her counterterrorism war against al Qaeda when she warns of self-defeat. She’s waging her counterterrorism war against us.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

6 Responses to White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler Vows Not to Let the White House Be Defeated by Actual Citizens

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @DevlinBarrett Does that mean they're just going to bury his concerns later, under the weight of others on the board?
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @DevlinBarrett: JusticeDept Backs Down in Fight With Judge Over Science Evidence - WSJ http://t.co/XNuMHj0aSy
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jesseberney How was it? I suspect that's what I'm going to be told is only thing short of multiple spot surgery soon @Atrios @LisaMcIntire
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong Usually means either that they are difficult to get along with or don't pay.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @davidcnswanson space between words are just same. one space each side. @ncweaver
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong Says they are probably not a good client!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RachelPerrone Right. She learned 10 years too late to make difference, b4 working way thru local school @ClinicEscort
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RachelPerrone I remember when I explained "need blind" to friend from grad school. She had no idea some schools would pay @ClinicEscort
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver CIA is not our evil. They are their own evil. They oustripped being our evil under Dulles and have only gotten further away.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver SHUSH. Stop giving the CIA all my tricks. @davidcnswanson
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian Perhaps not but FISC has approved order for 1A actions that enable others to break the law. @matthew_d_green
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver My guess is switching to cable system using proportional type would lose plausible deniability for losing cables @davidcnswanson
1hreplyretweetfavorite