Obama’s Yemen EO Still Lets Our Spooks Pay the Targets of the EO

As I noted earlier, Obama just signed an Executive Order ostensibly targeting the US assets of those who undermine Yemen’s stability, potentially including US citizens who do so. I’ve been comparing this EO to one of the analogous ones pointed out in Karen DeYoung’s article on the EO: one issued against Somalia in 2010 (h/t to Daveed Gartenstein-Ross for the link).

The EOs are very similar, including the language potentially targeting US citizens. But there are some interesting differences.

As DeYoung pointed out, the Yemeni EO, unlike the Somlia one, does not include an annex with named targets, even though the EO itself speaks of “certain members of the Government of Yemen.” As such, this EO seems to be a threat with consequences, not an immediate sanction.

The Yemen EO also uses slightly different language in the clause targeting those who materially support those destabilizing the country. Whereas the Somalia EO includes those who provide “logistical” or “technical” support, the Yemen EO includes those who provide “technological” support. So make sure you don’t serve as webmaster for someone Hillary Clinton thinks is destabilizing Yemen.

The most interesting difference, IMO, is this clause, which appears in the Yemen EO but does not in the Somalia one.

Sec. 5. Nothing in section 1 of this order shall prohibit transactions for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

In other words, while Obama doesn’t want you, or Ali Abdullah Saleh’s leave-behinds, or the AP to destabilize Yemen, he reserves the right for US government employees, grantees, or contractors to do so. Which presumably means, as happened in Afghanistan, we are and plan to continue paying some of the people who are in violation of this EO.

I wonder. Among all the adjectives we might use to describe the Saudis, do we use “grantee” among them?

Tweet about this on Twitter6Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook2Google+2Email to someone

25 Responses to Obama’s Yemen EO Still Lets Our Spooks Pay the Targets of the EO

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz Seriously, neither one of these worthless pukes should be in a Ferarri. http://t.co/YoR4NB3RxI
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ddayen With a name like that, a history like that AND A BULLET, he must be a terrorist, right?
42mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@ddayen Late to this, but I feel your pain brother. I grieve for Kash'n'carry w/you. Has he climbed above the sex offender listed guy yet?
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AngryVoters Nope. They can't legally spy on the Senate in the US either. @MarkUdall
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @BarryLeBrock What, they couldn't afford 1968 Bob Gibson?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MatthewWBenson @yvonnewingett @GEVetter @FredDuVal No answer from anyone? Really? Its very germane question. What say you @RepRaulGrijalva?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @RaysBaseball: Great pitcher, even better teammate. #Rays thank you, @DAVIDprice14. http://t.co/nk8cnLyzXT
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV C'mon, man. Why should Brennan resign. He only let the CIA spy on the Senate. It's not like he fucked his biographer or anything.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @HanniFakhoury I am your institutional memory Fakhoury!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel YES!! How often, and in how many ways, do I have to express that??? #ComeOnMan
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @HanniFakhoury You CANNOT tell me you are shocked by this. I was though the 90s, but the record is too bad and too long now for that.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @MarkUdall: Briefing on @CIA IG rprt shows it's time for John Brennan to resign. As long as he heads #CIA, problems will persist: http:/…
3hreplyretweetfavorite