The Whack-a-Moles Leave Women Unaroused

Pew Research has started polling whether people around the world approve of America’s use of drones against terror leaders.

Do you approve or disapprove of the United States
conducting missile strikes from pilotless aircraft called
drones to target extremists in countries such as Pakistan,
Yemen and Somalia?

The quick answer is, no one aside from Americans themselves (who love them) likes our use of drones. Only in the UK and Poland does the result come close to 50/50. Mind you, none of the countries where we’re using drones were asked in this questionnaire (Pew promises numbers from Pakistan soon). India, which is in the neighborhood and fights some of the same terrorist groups being hit, split 32 approving, 21 disapproving, and the rest not answering.

But I’m even more interested in the gender split. As shown above, the gender gap in drone approval levels is in the same neighborhood as Mitt Romney’s gender gap.

This is something I’ve been thinking of when I encounter men who defend our use of drones with almost visceral enthusiasm. Sure, Americans like explosions and displays of sheer power in all forms. But I can’t help but think about how drones have been sold as the ultimate porn thrill: sitting in a dark room in Nevada, watching over minute creatures whose humanity has been stripped, caressing a joy-stick to wield the ultimate power over life and death. La petite mort.

Never mind that a lot of the targeters are actually women, never mind that we keep whacking these moles without winning any war.

They make Americans feel powerful, and I guess that’s worth 34 net approval points.

Update: It turns out Americans aren’t all that fond of drones themselves, for uses where they might be surveilled.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

20 Responses to The Whack-a-Moles Leave Women Unaroused

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @astepanovich Wee, now there's a shocker.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AntonioFrench @MattSebek Well, either a grand jury or a preliminary hearing is required to set a case for trial.
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @mattapuzzo Yes, and then next summer DOJ can give them all awards and medals for the wholesale destruction of due process in the case.
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Shanesha Taylor May Not Have Enough Donated Money to Comply With Her Diversion Plea Deal http://t.co/9WCD72Weef via @phoenixnewtimes
26mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @steve_vladeck Kind of stunning the government affirmatively admitted that.
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ZoeTillman: Here are some of the issues the former Blackwater guards may bring up if they appeal yesterday's guilty verdicts: http://t.…
43mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ggreenwald @andohehir Sure would be nice if you could get it to Phoenix.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @OnIyHistory: Guinness planned to advertise in Nazi Germany during the 1936 Olympics ("It's time for a Guiness") http://t.co/D5AwTnTnmP
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @evanperez Also, statutes of limitation are blithely let run. So, while Holder's comment is nice, it is also total horseshit.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @evanperez Making it easier would be fine. But there are already plenty of prosecution modalities; they are just being ignored.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@RonWyden "ignorant abt...ways in which govt using EO 12333 to conduct overseas data collection w/o court oversight" http://t.co/0BIigEaMcD
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @michaelbkiefer Nice looking couple!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2012
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930