The “Most Transparent Administration Ever” Treats Recess Appointments with Greater Secrecy than Illegal Wiretapping

Charlie Savage just released the OLC opinion he got in response to a FOIA on opinions relating to recess appointments (this became an issue after Obama appointed Richard Cordray head of the Consumer Financial Protection Board using a recess appointment). It is a Jack Goldsmith memo dated February 20, 2004.

It is almost entirely redacted. Just 11 lines out of three pages are left unredacted–and one of those reads, “Please let us know if we may be of further assistance.”

Just for shits and giggles, I compared that memo to another Jack Goldsmith memo, one that relates to actual national security issues: Goldsmith’s May 6, 2004 memo finding the revamped illegal wiretap program legal. That’s a 108 page memo, of which 46 pages are entirely redacted or redacted to the same degree as any one of the three pages in this recess appointment one. There are a slew more redactions, many of them obviously improper.

The last line, “Please let me know if we can be of further assistance. (U)” appears unredacted there, too.

Nevertheless, the Administration redacted far more of the earlier Goldsmith memo–the recess appointment one–than the one dealing with one of our most sensitive counterterrorism programs.

Next up, the Administration is going to start redacting Civics textbooks, because the workings of government are so terribly sensitive.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

18 Responses to The “Most Transparent Administration Ever” Treats Recess Appointments with Greater Secrecy than Illegal Wiretapping

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @gregorylent Thanks for recommending I do. @niubi
emptywheel @MoonofA Precisely--that is what it looks like, which makes NYT look like propaganda organ. @Sulliview
emptywheel @MikeW_CA That's one reason I ask. If you're translating human rights articles on behalf of USG, you should say so.
emptywheel Translated today: Canadan Miss World contestant barred entry, cloning center set to open Not translated: Guo Feixiong sentence, mil overhaul
emptywheel @GregDjerejian That's sort of what I think. Tho this was not translated.
emptywheel RT @empiricalerror: @emptywheel This was originally reported by BILD, so *high* chance of it turning out to be complete bullshit.
emptywheel It SEEMS like NYT always makes stories on Chinese corruption/crackdowns available. Fine. But why not others?
emptywheel Really wish NYT would explain thought process behind articles it makes available in Mandarin. @Sulliview
emptywheel Guns Paris terrorists used bought fr Darknet provider--but they found proof fr emails... Were THEY not encrypted?
emptywheel @laurenist Does it matter? You'll enjoy yourself (and may well have done it anyway). @REI
emptywheel @davidsirota Right. Glad NYT adding pressure, but if transparency advocates just learning this they're not doing their job.
emptywheel @ppppolls I'd be interested in cross tabs of Deflategate opponents and presidential support.
June 2012
« May   Jul »