Mark Thiessen: More Important to HEAR–Not Read–Daily Brief Than Actually Respond to It

Yesterday, Mark Thieseen made a what amounts to a complaint that, half the time, President Obama reads his daily brief rather than receives it from a briefer directly. Here’s Obama’s response.

I figured, as Thiessen’s bleatings often are, it was meant to distract from the incompetence of his Bush people, but it was not yet clear what he was distracting from.

Now it is.

On April 10, 2004, the Bush White House declassified [the August 6, 2001 PDB that warned “Bin Laden determined to strike in US”]  — and only that daily brief  in response to pressure from the 9/11 Commission, which was investigating the events leading to the attack. Administration officials dismissed the document’s significance, saying that, despite the jaw-dropping headline, it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history, not a warning of the impending attack. While some critics considered that claim absurd, a close reading of the brief showed that the argument had some validity.

That is, unless it was read in conjunction with the daily briefs preceding Aug. 6, the ones the Bush administration would not release. While those documents are still not public, I have read excerpts from many of them, along with other recently declassified records, and come to an inescapable conclusion: the administration’s reaction to what Mr. Bush was told in the weeks before that infamous briefing reflected significantly more negligence than has been disclosed. In other words, the Aug. 6 document, for all of the controversy it provoked, is not nearly as shocking as the briefs that came before it.

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

But some in the administration considered the warning to be just bluster.

All that’s not to mean Obama’s not missing similarly grave threats: threats to the financial system and to the climate.

But this op-ed–and presumably the Kurt Eichenwald book it is based on–seems to confirm that the Bush Administration very arrogantly refused to listen to the warnings they were getting in their President’s (and Vice President’s) Daily Briefings.

And because they failed to heed that warning, they responded with all-out, Constitution eroding war, and not with the policing that might have prevented 9/11 in the first place.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

10 Responses to Mark Thiessen: More Important to HEAR–Not Read–Daily Brief Than Actually Respond to It

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV Warning: Donut do it!!
27sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @BobbyChesney: "Cyber insecurity: Hacking back" Financial Times article on #activedefense legal issues: http://t.co/dNuW7rr4Cw #infosec
7mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV When there's a Dunkin' right next to the gate for your flight. #Fate
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @SCOTUSPlaces @fedcourts Shockingly, a judge the country would be better off without but refuses to leave.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz "Inarticulate". https://t.co/fxzuD7wQWd
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz And how long before the American political press start slurping it up 24 hrs a day? https://t.co/LivdkdVf1a
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz And now FitBit lawyering! @CNN puts up a statement by @MichaelCohen212 furiously walking back his threats+nonsensical blather to @timkmak
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @davidshepardson: .@NWF to sue @USDOT over pipeline failures http://t.co/EOXiebsclc
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel WH won't endorse a bill bc it doesn't want definitions to infringe on spying. https://t.co/oTr8mQIpzK
30mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz So, the woman who assisted the NY prison escape appears to be entering a plea on live TV.
38mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz FitBit Journalism at the NYT: Steno some anonymous sources and then count the steps in the walkback https://t.co/Evdioe83Gh
44mreplyretweetfavorite
September 2012
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30