Mark Thiessen: More Important to HEAR–Not Read–Daily Brief Than Actually Respond to It

Yesterday, Mark Thieseen made a what amounts to a complaint that, half the time, President Obama reads his daily brief rather than receives it from a briefer directly. Here’s Obama’s response.

I figured, as Thiessen’s bleatings often are, it was meant to distract from the incompetence of his Bush people, but it was not yet clear what he was distracting from.

Now it is.

On April 10, 2004, the Bush White House declassified [the August 6, 2001 PDB that warned “Bin Laden determined to strike in US”]  — and only that daily brief  in response to pressure from the 9/11 Commission, which was investigating the events leading to the attack. Administration officials dismissed the document’s significance, saying that, despite the jaw-dropping headline, it was only an assessment of Al Qaeda’s history, not a warning of the impending attack. While some critics considered that claim absurd, a close reading of the brief showed that the argument had some validity.

That is, unless it was read in conjunction with the daily briefs preceding Aug. 6, the ones the Bush administration would not release. While those documents are still not public, I have read excerpts from many of them, along with other recently declassified records, and come to an inescapable conclusion: the administration’s reaction to what Mr. Bush was told in the weeks before that infamous briefing reflected significantly more negligence than has been disclosed. In other words, the Aug. 6 document, for all of the controversy it provoked, is not nearly as shocking as the briefs that came before it.

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

But some in the administration considered the warning to be just bluster.

All that’s not to mean Obama’s not missing similarly grave threats: threats to the financial system and to the climate.

But this op-ed–and presumably the Kurt Eichenwald book it is based on–seems to confirm that the Bush Administration very arrogantly refused to listen to the warnings they were getting in their President’s (and Vice President’s) Daily Briefings.

And because they failed to heed that warning, they responded with all-out, Constitution eroding war, and not with the policing that might have prevented 9/11 in the first place.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

10 Responses to Mark Thiessen: More Important to HEAR–Not Read–Daily Brief Than Actually Respond to It

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @NAChristakis: here is the link to the thoughtful open letter from @yale faculty mentioned here
bmaz Also, "terrorism" and "hate crimes" create preferred sets of victims to where all men and women not equal anymore.
bmaz This is spot on. Crime is crime. "Terrorism" and "hate crimes" are just excuses for the govt to leverage defendants
bmaz RT @BostonGlobe: Daily fantasy sports sites tell fans that it’s possible to win big money, but they tell a different story in court https:/…
emptywheel @charliespiering You do know USAF gives the govt MORE data w/fewer restrictions?
emptywheel @MoonofA Not to mention that usually when we're conducting regime change we LOVE to hurt the economy in question.
emptywheel RT @dandrezner: Four tough things columnists should do before writing about universities.
emptywheel @MoonofA Which is why I asked. Can't even think of any way NYT claim could be true except if we acknowledge Kurds have to sell to someone
JimWhiteGNV For Michael Rogers, every Monday is Cyber Monday.
emptywheel How would targeting ISIS' oil business would hurt Iraqi and Syrian economy?
emptywheel @lib_ertarian_ I wish we would too. Q is how we go about doing that.
September 2012
« Aug   Oct »