“They Hate Us for Our Religious Freedom”

As anti-American (and anti-Western) protest continue to spread across the Muslim world, the White House continues to claim the protests are all a response to the film, The Innocence of Muslims. Yesterday, Jay Carney said,

I think it’s important to note with regards to that protest

that there are protests taking place in different countries across the world that are responding to the movie that has circulated on the Internet. As Secretary Clinton said today, the United States government had nothing to do with this movie. We reject its message and its contents. We find it disgusting and reprehensible. America has a history of religious tolerance and respect for religious beliefs that goes back to our nation’s founding. We are stronger because we are the home to people of all religions, including millions of Muslims, and we reject the denigration of religion.

We also believe that there is no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence.


I would note that, again, the protests we’re seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie. They are not directly in reaction to any policy of the United States or the government of the United States or the people of the United States.

And he said something substantially similar in a gaggle a short time ago.

There are two problems with that.

First, the evidence in Libya that the attack, at least, was planned in advance with insider help. The Telegraph provides more details on the compromised safe houses and some of the sensitive documents taken from the Consulate.

Then there are more specific contexts, such as President Hadi’s continued efforts to consolidate power in Yemen, as Iona Craig lays out. Plus, there is more opposition to US policy in Yemen than in some other countries in the region.

I’ve even seen credible questions about the role of increasing food costs–the same kind of pressure that contributed to the Arab Spring last year.

But ultimately, too, there’s the question of why in several countries local guards have apparently allowed protestors to access the targeted compounds. While that could be a response to the movie, there also seems to be a factionalism involved.

All that’s not to say this always reflects a widespread opposition to US policies in all the countries involved, especially Libya.

But it’s to say that the White House wants this to be about a response to a movie, rather than a more nuanced response to some of the challenges that remain in our relations to the Middle East, including some justifiable opposition to our policies, either present or past.

I can understand doing that to get through the immediate moment of protests. But if the White House continues to ignore these underlying issues after the riots die down, it will be a big problem.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

26 Responses to “They Hate Us for Our Religious Freedom”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @ThusBloggedA A testament to the fact that GOP will avoid hurting authoritarian Dem like Daley over partisan advantage.
emptywheel @zmanian Commenter suggested that's more abt being able to get info on a spooks local DUI. Otherwise, IGs would be monitoring Agency abuse.
emptywheel How had there not already been a DOJ investigation of Chicago given the torture and disappearances?
emptywheel @umbyrella LOL. Sorry about that.
emptywheel Clarification: James Clapper is only going to read your Tweets if you're spook, want to be one, or want to sell Gatorade on base commissary.
emptywheel @umbyrella Well, only if you're a spook, want to be one, OR plan to work in a commissary on a base.
emptywheel Oops! James Clapper ALSO directed to read your social media! DEFINITELY don't talk abt EFF t-shits on Twitter. https://t.co/eJTKcw47yt
emptywheel I'm sort of curious what would happen if a bunch of tiny Lavabits committed to throwing away records at 17.5 months. https://t.co/CX977YQka0
emptywheel Section 307 requires Clapper to give Congress a list w/in 30 days of ANY Electronic Comm Service Provider not hoarding your records 18 mos.
emptywheel @ErrataRob Well just in case Congress is mandating that Clapper go thru every spook's hoodie stack to be sure. Can never be too safe.
emptywheel Last year @AramRoston busted top NSA officer for on-the-side company. https://t.co/iEjVb2qsH4 Intel auth would eliminate rept on conflicts
September 2012
« Aug   Oct »