It’s Not about Workers, It’s about CEOs

Many of the editorials about the anti-union attack in MI have supported the unions or–even from conservative papers–criticized the way the Republicans crammed it through. This is one of the few in favor.

Predictably, this one, from Daniel Howes, either doesn’t know or chooses to deceive readers about how unions work.

And organized labor, fresh from a failed effort to enshrine collective bargaining rights in the state constitution, faces its most serious existential threat since the Sit-Down strikes and Battle of the Overpass cemented the institutional permanence of the UAW.

Until now. A right-to-work law that gives members the choice to join a union rank-and-file — or not to join — threatens to stanch materially the union dues flow, membership and, accordingly, the political muscle predominantly used by unions in the service of the Democratic Party.

Workers already have a choice whether to join a union or not. If that’s what Howes wants, that’s what he’s got already in Michigan.

But I appreciate it for one thing. Unlike the propaganda Snyder is tweeting out like a nervous school girl, which claims this offers anything for the workers–union and non-union–who will lose $1,500 in wages, Howes identifies honestly who this is meant to impress.

CEOs. Not workers.

It probably won’t. But the move, coupled with a coming financial workout for Detroit, is likely to reshape positively the debate about Michigan and its largest city among CEOs and investors looking for opportunity and growth — provided the national economy isn’t pushed back into recession by Washington’s plunge off a “fiscal cliff” of its own making.

This is the same “job creators” nonsense that Mitt spewed for a year, unsuccessfully.

But you have to look no further than this anti-union campaign to discern whether impressing CEOs will do a damn thing for workers.

In the million-dollar ad campaign Windquest and former Amway CEO Dick DeVos has ponied up, rather than using real Michiganders or paying local actors to bray about “freedom,” he used stock photos.

Even if you impress Dick DeVos, it seems (and he is the one bankrolling and twisting arms to make this happen, he’lll still treat workers like a cut and paste.

It’s very simple. Impressing CEOs who prefer disempowered, desperate workers doesn’t actually help workers.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to It’s Not about Workers, It’s about CEOs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @RobertJMccoy1 He did, in the January debate, as I was reminded.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @kirkmurphy: Fly the friendly skies, people. "Delta apologizes for flight attendants' brawl that forced flight diversion https://t.co/Fe
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @evacide I know. That's the only possible conclusion one can draw about an organization that keeps demanding strong encryption.
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@evacide You're just cross CNN forgot to add the EFF logo to the hoodie.
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @elisefoley I admit I used to.
40mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV And if we have to choose an offensive term to describe Cruz, the one Trump used falls short...
42mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @kgosztola: Hillary grinning on the stock market floor while standing next to Ray Kelly. How perfectly representative: https://t.co/qUJP
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Guy who says we have to say Merry Christmas again also calls his opponent a pussy. And his audience loves both...
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Ex_Directory1 I'm not saying it does.
55mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Filing a patent tomorrow on a perpetual motion machine: Marco Rubio singing "99 Bottles of Beer".
57mreplyretweetfavorite
December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031