It’s Not about Workers, It’s about CEOs

Many of the editorials about the anti-union attack in MI have supported the unions or–even from conservative papers–criticized the way the Republicans crammed it through. This is one of the few in favor.

Predictably, this one, from Daniel Howes, either doesn’t know or chooses to deceive readers about how unions work.

And organized labor, fresh from a failed effort to enshrine collective bargaining rights in the state constitution, faces its most serious existential threat since the Sit-Down strikes and Battle of the Overpass cemented the institutional permanence of the UAW.

Until now. A right-to-work law that gives members the choice to join a union rank-and-file — or not to join — threatens to stanch materially the union dues flow, membership and, accordingly, the political muscle predominantly used by unions in the service of the Democratic Party.

Workers already have a choice whether to join a union or not. If that’s what Howes wants, that’s what he’s got already in Michigan.

But I appreciate it for one thing. Unlike the propaganda Snyder is tweeting out like a nervous school girl, which claims this offers anything for the workers–union and non-union–who will lose $1,500 in wages, Howes identifies honestly who this is meant to impress.

CEOs. Not workers.

It probably won’t. But the move, coupled with a coming financial workout for Detroit, is likely to reshape positively the debate about Michigan and its largest city among CEOs and investors looking for opportunity and growth — provided the national economy isn’t pushed back into recession by Washington’s plunge off a “fiscal cliff” of its own making.

This is the same “job creators” nonsense that Mitt spewed for a year, unsuccessfully.

But you have to look no further than this anti-union campaign to discern whether impressing CEOs will do a damn thing for workers.

In the million-dollar ad campaign Windquest and former Amway CEO Dick DeVos has ponied up, rather than using real Michiganders or paying local actors to bray about “freedom,” he used stock photos.

Even if you impress Dick DeVos, it seems (and he is the one bankrolling and twisting arms to make this happen, he’lll still treat workers like a cut and paste.

It’s very simple. Impressing CEOs who prefer disempowered, desperate workers doesn’t actually help workers.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to It’s Not about Workers, It’s about CEOs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @astepanovich With the sole exception (a big one) that PRISM has limited targeting limits (CT, CP, FG) tho they're abused @slim404
emptywheel @astepanovich Not sure protections under PRISM are any better than under 12333, esp w/Section 319 (for better or worse) @slim404
emptywheel @csoghoian That is a fun fact, but all the more reason you should have told us abt the bar codes! @briankrebs
emptywheel @JamesWWeirick Until they're willing to say WHERE our SOF were besides, close proximity or vicinity, we don't know. @attackerman
emptywheel @JamesWWeirick Not clear. Also false that Campbell didn't say same thing (in less detail) yesterday. He did. @attackerman
emptywheel I'm really sad @csoghoian didn't tell us about this.
emptywheel Shorter Lindsey: I was smart to oppose Hurricane Sandy funding bc I knew Chris Christie would use it corruptly.
emptywheel General Campbell and Senator Sullivan Squelch Discussion of an Independent Investigation into MSF Strike
emptywheel @onekade if you pee you'll deposit cooties so... No peeing.
emptywheel RT @LibyaLiberty: I'm gonna start a Muslims In the NRA movement - get chapters open in every state. Two in Michigan. That'll get gun contro…
emptywheel RT @TyreJim: Verizon’s Zombie Cookie Gets New Life
December 2012
« Nov   Jan »