Government Teat-Sucking Bankster, Steven Rattner, Calls Auto Bailout “Un-American”

I’m sure someone thought it was a good idea to trot out Steven Rattner to spin the government’s announced plan to sell its GM stake.

But I don’t know how anyone thought a bankster–and particularly this bankster–could say this and still wield any credibility.

From Washington’s point of view, divesting its remaining shares will end an uncomfortable and distinctly un-American period of government ownership in a major industrial company.

Sure. Rattner places this sentiment in “Washington’s point of view.” Still, consider the messenger.

After all, he barely mentions here–as he did in his book–that this was not just a bailout of some industrial companies. It was also a bailout of two finance companies, Chrysler Finance and GMAC (he mentions that the government still owns Ally/GMAC, but still calls the scorecard, “nearly complete”). As such, it was also the bailout of the Private Equity firm, Cerberus, that had spent the previous years stripping Chrysler in the hopes of retaining just the finance arms.

He also neglects to mention that the government still pursues the un-American policy of treating banks according to a different set of rules, not only providing them free money, but seemingly exempting them from all laws.

Finally, he shows no self-awareness of his own history, including paying kickbacks so his firm could make big money off of New York State (for which he, like all banksters, got a mere wrist-slap).

I’m not saying the government should hold onto its GM stake forever (though unlike Rattner, executive compensation is the last reason I’d cite to applaud this sale). But having someone like Rattner call government intervention in purportedly capitalist companies un-American only perpetuates the idea that industrial companies should have to abide by so-called rules of capitalism that the titans of capitalism, the banksters, have all but discarded.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

6 Responses to Government Teat-Sucking Bankster, Steven Rattner, Calls Auto Bailout “Un-American”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @KellyFlood3 Hey, went to Mejico the other day. Fantastic food....and reasonably priced too. Like that place!
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @KellyFlood3 Meh, can live w/o that tree, but it ripped up a key water feed pip in the process. No water in house until tomorrow am.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @shenebraskan This one is toast. Has a date with a chainsaw.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @samhusseini: Great summary: “@evakatrina: Bernie Sanders: We Need More #Saudi Intervention. Wait, *what*? http://t.co/dcSgow3KB9
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mczajko Not sure. Hopefully the latter.
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @CostaSamaras: Probably should include this and other needed resiliency investments in the social cost of carbon estimates. https://t.c…
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BryanSmart One excuse for not prosecuting the banks is bc a lot of people would lose their job. Guess what? @Object_InSpace
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BryanSmart Sure. Just like helping Al Qaeda get money for terrorism is against law. Lynch didn't prosecute HSBC for that @Object_InSpace
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @TiaRachel: @emptywheel When my mom was a kid & angry at her mother, she'd tear off all the 'do not remove' tags to get her in trouble.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jackalltogether When you do can you make Vox Dot Com to publish it? I have a feeling we all need to know this.
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Someday "click that you've read these when you haven't" ToS agreements will seem as foreign to people as those DO NOT REMOVE pillow labels.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jackalltogether But whose idea was it and why all the warnings abt removing them?
54mreplyretweetfavorite
December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031