Why Not Have a Hearing on Civilian Drone Casualties?

Yesterday, I suggested that Mike Rogers and Dutch Ruppersberger’s certainty that public accounts of drone casualties are overstated may say more about our failed intelligence oversight than it does about the number of civilians who have died in our drone strikes.

Later yesterday, Steven Aftergood posted a must read reflection on how our intelligence oversight has backed off public accountability. I’ll have more to say about Aftergood’s post, but for the moment I wanted to look at a measure of public accountability he uses: the number of public oversight hearings, particularly those with outside experts.

Over the past decade, however, the Committee’s priorities appear to have changed, to the detriment of public accountability.  In fact, despite the Committee’s assurance in its annual reports, public disclosure even of the Committee’s own oversight activities has decreased.

In 2012, the Committee held only one public hearing, despite the prevalence of intelligence-related public controversies.  That is the smallest number of public hearings the Committee has held in at least 25 years and possibly ever.  A non-governmental witness has not been invited to testify at an open Committee hearing since 2007.

Breaking! Under Dianne Feinstein’s leadership, the Senate Intelligence Committee has had its fewest public hearings in at least 25 years!

Aftergood’s point, though, suggests one remedy for the problem with Mike Rogers’ boasting (or more lucrative assurances from DiFi that her oversight is all we need on drone strikes).

Why not have a public hearing at which the major contributors to the discussion of drone casualties testify in the same place?

The Intelligence Committees could invite both The Bureau for Investigative Journalism and the AP to explain how they conducted independent assessments of civilian casualties and what those assessments showed. They could invite Peter Bergen to explain his dubious numbers publicly (at one point, after all, Bergen actually knew as much about Osama bin Laden as the people hunting him in secret).  They could invite Pepperdine professor Gregory Neal–who has a paper saying that when the government uses its collateral damage estimation process, it does a remarkably good job at keeping collateral damage low, but admits that “due to the realities of combat operations, the process cannot always be followed.” Hell, they could even invite John Brennan to lie publicly about civilian casualties, as he has done in the past. Maybe, too, Brennan can explain how all militant age men are treated and counted, by default, as militants.

The point is there is a partial remedy to the grave problems with the cognitive challenges overseers like Mike Rogers and Dianne Feinstein face. One of those is to publicly accept the testimony of those who have different investments than the intelligence community.

Right now, continuing to rest the drone program’s legitimacy on repeated public calls to “trust me” actually undermines its legitimacy.

Sadly, resting our national security policy on repeated “trust mes” appears to be what Rogers and Feinstein like.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Why Not Have a Hearing on Civilian Drone Casualties?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel A successful Farmer's Market trip: No one mentioned (noticed?) my shirt was inside out. And got a YUGE bucket of damson plums to jam.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @p2wy Just in time for Art Prize!
48mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DGisSERIOUS Was ISIS--as it has been so often for Erdogan--a premise to go after a Kurd in Rasool's arrest?
56mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JoshMBlackman @RMFifthCircuit @lmbrownlee1 Josh, I suggest a duel with 3D printed guns.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @theurbansherpa Multitasking!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Really, kind of crude and lumbering in a very disappointing way. Meh.
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Current status: Test driving a Maserati Quattroporte around the Camelback foothills. Gotta say, it is nice, but not all that impressive.
10hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Aaron Neville is a terrific singer, but he's remarkably awkward on stage. Can't dance.
10hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Take us ther, Mavis! http://t.co/O6mARtIzrt
11hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @armandodkos ....but then I spent pretty much rest of day in the courthouse and away from anything more. Berman's decision spot on though.
12hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @armandodkos Not really. I did this https://t.co/s5jt1B0rID which was, mostly prepackaged w/some quick takes inserted early yesterday....
12hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MasaccioEW Somewhat ironically, think she literally has been a reporter here for about ten days or something; came from, I think, Miami.
12hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031