Leaked Details of MIT Investigation

The NYT reports details that must come from MIT’s investigation–though the spokesperson insists it’s a review–of its involvement in Aaron Swartz’ arrest and conviction.

There are a few I find of particular interest.

First, MIT claims it learned that Aaron was still downloading JSTOR materials on January 3.

However, on Jan. 3, 2011, according to internal M.I.T. documents obtained by The New York Times, the university was informed that the intruder was back — this time downloading documents very slowly, with a new method of access, so as not to alert the university’s security experts.

Court documents say JSTOR informed MIT about this around Christmas.

The NYT references “a security expert” analyzing MIT’s network.

Early on Jan. 4, at 8:08 a.m., according to Mr. Halsall’s detailed internal timeline of the events, a security expert was able to locate that new method of access precisely — the wiring in a network closet in the basement of Building 16, a nondescript rectangular structure full of classrooms and labs that, like many buildings on campus, is kept unlocked.

This is a detail I’ve long wondered about: who was the expert and what tools did she or he use?

And then there’s the thoroughly unsurprising news that Michael Pickett was with MIT’s head cop when they found Aaron on January 6, 2011.

A little after 2 p.m., according to the government, Mr. Swartz was spotted heading down Massachusetts Avenue within a mile of M.I.T. After being questioned by an M.I.T. police officer, he dropped his bike and ran (according to the M.I.T. timeline, he was stopped by an M.I.T. police captain and Mr. Pickett).

Anyone want to bet they were using some fancy surveillance to find Aaron?

Tweet about this on Twitter5Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook1Google+1Email to someone

42 Responses to Leaked Details of MIT Investigation

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @nickmanes1 A claim that Ellis is "moderate." I kid you not. @wizardkitten
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @wizardkitten I heard certain Dems pushing Ellis, so maybe that's what they've got. @nickmanes1
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JoshMBlackman @MikeSacksEsq @dsc250 @steve_vladeck @imillhiser Yeah, I am not so sure SCOTUS is as eager to take this as you are.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Finally figured it out: people can't come off the watch list because they are so pissed at not being allowed off they might do terra.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @imillhiser @JoshMBlackman @steve_vladeck @dsc250 @MikeSacksEsq One other thought: I can see Edwards or another judge sua sponte requesting.
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @wizardkitten God, sounds like it's even stupidly made. Are they just wasting donors money at this point? @nickmanes1
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Actually, I think they need a name with your gait. So "Wheeler walker" might fly.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MikeScarcella: 'DOJ tries to hide the Blue Book behind a veil of privilege, trumpeting a laundry list of doom-and-gloom outcomes.' http…
19mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Horse people know it's easy to get wrong lead on some gaits. RT @emptywheel: Apparently your gait or DNA can be nominated as a terrorist.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Apparently your gait or DNA can be nominated as a terrorist.
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @wizardkitten I'm just hoping they roll out Mike Rogers to beat up Amash before this is out, bc that would be popcorn-worthy. @nickmanes1
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @wizardkitten Maybe GOPers think that by having a Real Live Politician say it, it'll sound like a real policy issue. @nickmanes1
27mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031