Secretary of State John Kerry, Our Newest “General” Leading Cambodia 2.0


Congratulations to John Kerry, who now has the job he has always wanted.

I do hope some enterprising journalist asks him about this, a key legal justification for the forever wherever war he is now a critical leader of.

The department has not found any authority for the proposition that when one of the parties to an armed conflict plans and executes operations from a base in a new nation, an operation to engage the enemy in that location cannot be part of the original armed conflict and thus subject to the laws of war governing that conflict, unless the hostilities become sufficiently intense and protracted in the new location. That does not appear to be the rule of the historical practice, for instasnce, even in a traditional international conflict. See John R. Stevenson, Legal Advisor, Department of State, United States Military Action in Cambodia: Questions of International Law, Adress before the Hammerskjold Forum of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (May 28, 1970), in 3 The Vietnam War and International Law: The Widening Context 23 28-30 (Richard A Falk, ed 1972) (arguing that in an international armed conflict, if a netural state has been unable for any reason to prevent violations of its neutrality by the troops of one belligerent using its territory as a base of operations, the other belligerent has historically  been justified in attacking those enemy forces in that state). [my emphasis]

I fear the projectiles he and his team will be throwing this time around will be far more lethal than the medals he once threw.

Update: Thanks to pushingrope for suggesting that this YouTube is more appropriate than old pictures of the Winter Soldiers.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Secretary of State John Kerry, Our Newest “General” Leading Cambodia 2.0

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @OKnox Biggest problem w/entire debate is it has been pitched as abt nukes, for years, when it is instead abt hegemony. @BalkansBohemia
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @OKnox Not to mention the failure to discuss NPT and basic sovereignty. @BalkansBohemia
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @OKnox But if you opposed deal before bc enrichment BELOW levels that could lead to nukes opposing on nuke grounds a lie. @BalkansBohemia
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "it’s no surprise to find Yahoo!’s Matt Bai, the unofficial high priest of conventional wisdom," http://t.co/LYIg5gU8lY
14mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @OKnox And that Bush Admin precondition was seen as chosen precisely because zero chance Iran would agree. 2/2
28mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @OKnox Part of the problem was that was the Bush Admin position: all enrichment had to be ended as precondition for talks. 1/2
28mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @lrozen: Carper makes it #30 Senators supporting #Iran deal. His statement shows appreciation for complexity of Iran politics http://t.…
30mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @michaelwhitney Would this be the wrong moment to ask why groping an old white dude is now a meme?
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In 2010, "Ramos was 2nd-most recognized Latino leader behind SCOTUS Justice Sonia Sotomayor" http://t.co/xiH84cNkfw Year after confirmed
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DanaHoule We have a lot more guns in this country than France does.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DanaHoule That all depends on what those rightwing populists do then.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @shekissesfrogs Ah, saw you got that right, sorry for the correx--missed the grammar pre-coffee.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728