Obama Will Propose New Efforts to Make Our Creaky Physically Dangerous Critical Infrastructure CyberSafe

One of Obama’s key proposals in tonight’s State of the Union will be yet another effort to shore up the cybersecurity of our critical infrastructure.

As a threshold matter, I find it a remarkable coinkydink that the WaPo just reported the leaked findings of an NIE saying that the Chinese (and Israelis and Russians and the French, but the Chinese are bigger and badder, apparently) continue to rob us blind via cybertheft. I look forward to learning whether this — unlike the convenient drone rule book leaks supporting John Brennan’s confirmation — get reported as sanctioned leaks, as required under the Intelligence Authorization.

And speaking of John Brennan, he’s the Homeland Security Czar. A big part of his job is keeping us safe from precisely these kinds of attacks. So why didn’t he get a single question about why he should be CIA Director considering he has been such an abject failure keeping us safe from cyberattacks? (He was asked a question about CIA’s role in cybersecurity, but not asked to explain why he has been such a failure in his current role.)

Now, frankly, I don’t know that that is much John Brennan’s fault. Folks will say that the problem is — as it has been since Richard Clarke first started fearmongering on this front — that corporations won’t participate willingly and no one is going to make them.

But the proposal — which you’ll see if you tune in — doesn’t change that. It’s still voluntary.

And here’s the thing that all the cyberexperts in the world seem to be missing. Not only are the private owners of our critical infrastructure unwilling to fix their cyberdefenses. They’re not willing to keep their brick and mortar infrastructure up to date either. See, for example, PG&E or ConEd‘s recent records, for example.

Look, if these companies refuse to keep up their physical infrastructure and their cyber infrastructure, there’s probably an underlying reason motivating their negligence that no amount of immunity or winks or risk-free information sharing on the cyber side is going to fix. Moreover, if they are physically fundamentally unsafe, no amount of tinkering with their cybersecurity is going to make them safe. They’ll be vulnerable to a terrorist attack and be vulnerable to not entirely random failures and explosions.

You need to solve the underlying problem if you want to keep our critical infrastructure safe. And yet another EO, particularly one limited to cybersecurity and not affect brick and mortar integrity, will not do that.

Updated: Reading Obama’s longer proposal, it does aim to increase the “resiliency” of our physical infrastructure too. So it is not limited to cyber. That said, the underlying problem remains. Private companies aren’t spending the money to invest in this, whether it is physical resilience (or bare minimum functionality) or cyberdefense.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

7 Responses to Obama Will Propose New Efforts to Make Our Creaky Physically Dangerous Critical Infrastructure CyberSafe

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @theurbansherpa she definitely used to. But then she got a better Parish.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This is too laugh. Come on, seriously?? https://t.co/V8G1sq5gCZ
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lawrencelebin Absolutely not my place to judge people's faith.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@McCannSportsLaw No, having JD does not mean diddly squat. It is whether you have practiced enough to have a clue about what you are doing
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @theurbansherpa You accusing your mom of squirming at Mass? She's not really the squirming type.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Welp, @ESPN, @MortReport + Lester Munson are not just heinous stenographers of lies, but duplicitous on law too http://t.co/YY6PCX9Ve0
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @SportsbySharona Tebow's job might better be described as 2-point conversion captain, not backup QB. @tyschalter
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TheTabbasco Yup. That's why I said he'd partly listen to those bits. @LOLGOP
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @theurbansherpa I'd love to see them go to Mass bc they'd prolly squirm a lot. And Huff and Puff.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @WilliamOckhamTx Now that you mention it it does say 2016 inside. @barryeisler
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @RMFifthCircuit No! Still wondering about that,
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Will Sammy Alito go to Mass? Will Scalia go to Mass? Will Clarence Thomas go to Mass??? Since this is all newsworthy and whatnot...
26mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728