DOD Uses Sequester to Excuse 5 Year Delay in Implementing Basic Network Security

More than 22 months ago, I wrote a post analyzing Congressional testimony describing the gaping holes in DOD network security 3 years after a nasty malware infection and a year after the publication of Collateral Murder by WikiLeaks.

Almost two years later, Assistant Secretary of Defense Zachary Lemnios says sequestration might hold up improving network security on classified and unclassified networks.

Zachary J. Lemnios, the assistant secretary of defense for research and engineering, was asked by Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) to describe the “most significant” impacts on cybersecurity that could follow from the anticipated cuts to the Pentagon’s budget.

Mr. Lemnios replied that “cuts under sequestration could hurt efforts to fight cyber threats, including [...] improving the security of our classified Federal networks and addressing WikiLeaks.”

This is news not just for the specific details offered about how bad DOD’s network security remains (click through for more details). But also for the tacit admission that 3 years after a breach DOD considers tantamount to aiding the enemy, and 5 years after a malware infection that badly affected DOD’s networks in Iraq, DOD still hasn’t completed security enhancements to its networks.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

3 Responses to DOD Uses Sequester to Excuse 5 Year Delay in Implementing Basic Network Security

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @SuzanneTwoTon: BREAKING: SCOTUS Declines to Stop Florida Marriages | The Bilerico Project http://t.co/qGPuNG9uyJ via @bilericoproject
12mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @imraansiddiqi @KidFury @errrfzflwr Shouldn't those shirts say "I Can't Stop Eating"?
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Cry, cry baby. Wah, wah, has left the building.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @joshuafoust: Male journalists forced to sit there, ignored, like their female colleagues are totes mad they got treated that way https:…
23mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @TimothyS: I can't believe that male White House reporters are actually complaining that no men were called on today. Take a deep breath…
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @michaelwhitney Have McGirt, will travel!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Doge going on a joy ride. http://t.co/PKTrlVzxM8
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BradMossEsq But if it doesn't do what it is supposed to do, then we should talk about that, bc then we can shut it down.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BradMossEsq Just you. I've never been opposed. I'm opposed to its misuse. Upstream is prone to problems, per a pushover FISA judge.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mokecule VERY many WH journos show up to every briefing knowing there's almost no chance they'll get called. They still go.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mokecule Does that change the value at all of sitting and listening for the gross majority who don't get called?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @PGEddington: ICYMI: My latest on @Medium: “When Intelligence Become Advocacy” https://t.co/d9c9jly8DK
2hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728