DOD Uses Sequester to Excuse 5 Year Delay in Implementing Basic Network Security

More than 22 months ago, I wrote a post analyzing Congressional testimony describing the gaping holes in DOD network security 3 years after a nasty malware infection and a year after the publication of Collateral Murder by WikiLeaks.

Almost two years later, Assistant Secretary of Defense Zachary Lemnios says sequestration might hold up improving network security on classified and unclassified networks.

Zachary J. Lemnios, the assistant secretary of defense for research and engineering, was asked by Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) to describe the “most significant” impacts on cybersecurity that could follow from the anticipated cuts to the Pentagon’s budget.

Mr. Lemnios replied that “cuts under sequestration could hurt efforts to fight cyber threats, including […] improving the security of our classified Federal networks and addressing WikiLeaks.”

This is news not just for the specific details offered about how bad DOD’s network security remains (click through for more details). But also for the tacit admission that 3 years after a breach DOD considers tantamount to aiding the enemy, and 5 years after a malware infection that badly affected DOD’s networks in Iraq, DOD still hasn’t completed security enhancements to its networks.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

3 Responses to DOD Uses Sequester to Excuse 5 Year Delay in Implementing Basic Network Security

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @william_pitts Also, it was Mike that told me to follow you, so you can blame him....
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts ...was insane. Anyway, hope to meet you at some point. Cheers.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts No, me either. I couldn't even respond to him during his Arias live coverage because the dung that then came into my timeline
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts I've seen what Kiefer runs into. Brutal.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts also, frankly, you and I probably don't know each other well enough for me to have snarked at you like I did. That's my bad.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts Jeebus, there are other prickly cacti out there??
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts Hey, even if there was no mistake, that is cool. I make snarky comments, I ought take them too. But I do like your work fwiw.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts Err, that should read "your work"
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts I do appreciate your coverage+view. If you are such a tender little mercy, you ought wake up. Let work work stand up, it does
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @william_pitts It's stupefying that this is your response to somebody who has appreciated your coverage. Don't be a holier than thou jerk.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @kjzzphoenix @yvonnewingett Really, y'all are going to fall for Mel McDonald's hand crafted hasty spin? Do you not know Mel? Don't be rooks.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz It strikes me as beyond stupefying any reporter who deigns to be from a "real" news source yaks about Kanye/Kim West https://t.co/Y5aRVEHHWN
8hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728