Shorter Rick Snyder: Black People Can Be Customers, Not Citizens

As Rick Snyder was announcing the takeover of Detroit’s government, paving the way for an Emergency Manager for the city, his staff tweeted out this:

“Citizens of #Detroit are the customers of the city, not just the citizens. We need to figure out how to provide them great service.”

It might be a nice sentiment (if many public services under Rick Snyder, especially education and services helping the poor, hadn’t already been cut to make way for tax cuts for businesses, and if the entire point of an EM weren’t to make further huge cuts to services).

Except that if and when Detroit officially gets an EM (there is an appeal process that will roll out over the next couple of weeks), the people of Detroit will, temporarily at least, lose their ability to elect representatives to run their city. Down the road, after Detroit has continued to disintegrate for 18 months (EMs have never turned around a city), elected representatives will be able to get rid of the EM. But until then, local democracy in Detroit will be dead.

And so at precisely the moment when Snyder moved to locally disenfranchise 40% of Michigan’s African Americans — leaving half of Michigan’s African Americans locally disenfranchised — he relabeled those African Americans (and Latinos, and remarkably few whites) “customers.”

Black people, Rick Snyder seems to be saying, can be customers, but they can’t be citizens.

We have spent the week talking about whether or not we still need a Voting Rights Act. Given the cynical new ways politicians are using to disenfranchise people of color, I say it’s time to expand it, not end it.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

7 Responses to Shorter Rick Snyder: Black People Can Be Customers, Not Citizens

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @barrettmarson It was nasty all the time.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @barrettmarson @troyhaydenfox10 I miss the old CB-6. That was fun.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Gonna be a lot of this for a very long time https://t.co/4OpGOjTg3t
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ryanlcooper Cable is going to be fantastic. All Trump, all the time. You'll love it!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @imillhiser Same, and I am not convinced that Cruz wouldn't be worse in many ways. Not convinced Trump is better either.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sahilkapur And disputing that its an acceptable justification for the difference in way Clinton/press acted then and way she is acting now.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sahilkapur No, just disputing that the relative difference is of any current materiality as to whether Sanders stays in race.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sahilkapur And the fact that relative delegate counts were a little different doesn't ratify the propriety of the situation; condemns it
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sahilkapur Bullshit. The entire weight of the DLC/DNC and press lackeys were not oriented cravenly against Clinton then as are Sanders now.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sahilkapur I think the statement speaks for itself.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sahilkapur Dewey beats Truman! Let the people vote.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sahilkapur And it is hilarious, if not flat out ridiculous that the press holds Sanders to a relative standard they didn't Clinton in 2008
4hreplyretweetfavorite