Shorter Rick Snyder: Black People Can Be Customers, Not Citizens

As Rick Snyder was announcing the takeover of Detroit’s government, paving the way for an Emergency Manager for the city, his staff tweeted out this:

“Citizens of #Detroit are the customers of the city, not just the citizens. We need to figure out how to provide them great service.”

It might be a nice sentiment (if many public services under Rick Snyder, especially education and services helping the poor, hadn’t already been cut to make way for tax cuts for businesses, and if the entire point of an EM weren’t to make further huge cuts to services).

Except that if and when Detroit officially gets an EM (there is an appeal process that will roll out over the next couple of weeks), the people of Detroit will, temporarily at least, lose their ability to elect representatives to run their city. Down the road, after Detroit has continued to disintegrate for 18 months (EMs have never turned around a city), elected representatives will be able to get rid of the EM. But until then, local democracy in Detroit will be dead.

And so at precisely the moment when Snyder moved to locally disenfranchise 40% of Michigan’s African Americans — leaving half of Michigan’s African Americans locally disenfranchised — he relabeled those African Americans (and Latinos, and remarkably few whites) “customers.”

Black people, Rick Snyder seems to be saying, can be customers, but they can’t be citizens.

We have spent the week talking about whether or not we still need a Voting Rights Act. Given the cynical new ways politicians are using to disenfranchise people of color, I say it’s time to expand it, not end it.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

7 Responses to Shorter Rick Snyder: Black People Can Be Customers, Not Citizens

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV @BarackObama Who said anything about ending wars?
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @AllThingsHLS: This is the most dysfunctional and disloyal administration since that of Millard Fillmore. http://t.co/qQ9DVWRcTX
27mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Has anyone explained to @BarackObama that he can't win another Nobel Peace Prize by ending wars he starts or escalates?
38mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lhartman Nah. Maybe once Hagel does his I can write a really long book review.
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @p2wy Are we allowed to rehash old propaganda on the event of your 50th?
46mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@foyp I think rather than "Night Operations" they should call it "Tooth Fairy Visits," if we're going to employ euphemisms.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Prediction: Chuck Hagel's autobiographical novel will hew closer to the truth than Gates' or Panetta's did.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @icontherecord: Becky willl answer your questions today at 2PM EST at http://t.co/Ooezs0AOE4.
55mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joanneleon Actually don't think that is universally true. I think there's tremendous cognitive capture though.
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joanneleon Not even just that. Willingness to keep failing using same method would be funny if it weren't so dangerous.
57mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel As Obama Embraces Multi-Fronted War, He Fires Chuck Hagel https://t.co/HRfHNfWZcH Can someone figure who'll pay for this now?
58mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joanneleon And of the fidelity of their allies.
58mreplyretweetfavorite