Prosecuting Our Own Conspiracies

My first reaction when I heard about the case of Eric Harroun — the Army veteran arrested last week on one count of conspiring to use a WMD (in the form of a rocket propelled grenade) — was that we were going to need bigger jails, because we’ll surely be arresting all our Qatari allies who are also conspiring to arm the al-Nusrah Front with things like RPGs.

But his father’s claim he was working for the CIA (which might explain why an FBI officer assigned to the Washington Field Office would file this case in Eastern District of VA, the CIA’s home district) makes the charges all the more interesting. Certainly, the affidavit reads like someone who was trying to set up cover as a terrorist recruit. Moreover, between the multiple videos he posted and the 4 FBI interviews he had before he got a lawyer suggest he wasn’t at all worried about being charged for associating with what he said (in one of those lawyer-less interviews) he knew to be a designated terror organization.

If he had a formal role with the CIA, it also might explain how Harroun managed to reenter Turkey without his passport.

HARROUN stated that he was able to re-enter Turkey on or about February 10, 2013, without his passport.

Is also might explain who is paying for lots of international travel with no apparent means of support. And it might explain why a US Army vet needed to be trained on how to use an RPG.

So if Harroun’s father is right, and he was working for CIA, then why is he in jail?

There are two details I find particularly interesting. First, the affidavit concentrates on Harroun’s condemnation of Zionism.

On or about March 11,2013, FoxNews.com published an article based in part on an interview of HARROUN. In the article, HARROUN acknowledged that he had been fighting with Syrian rebels, including the al-Nusrah Front, but stated that he had returned to Turkey. According to the article, HARROUN’s Facebook wall included the quote: “The only good Zionist is a dead Zionist” and HARROUN stated that he intended to travel to Palestine because of Israeli atrocities there.

[snip]

During the March 12 interview, HARROUN was asked about his comment that “the only good Zionist is a dead Zionist.” HARROUN stated that he equated Zionism with Nazism and Fascism.

And it appears the March 11 Fox article may be what led the FBI in Turkey to start investigating Harroun, which was actually published a month after Harroun had returned to Turkey from Syria. The three earlier things Harroun posted about his involvement in Syria don’t seem to have alarmed the FBI. (Note: I’m not sure when it became a crime to utter anti-Zionist statements, but apparently FBI now treats it as evidence of terrorism.)

Add in the fact that he was associated with a downed helicopter.

On or about February 14, 2013, an individual with access to a Facebook account which uses HARROUN’s name and profile photograph shared a link to a video of a helicopter that appeared to have been shotdown. Based on my review of the public information associated with this account, I believe that this account is HARROUN’s Facebook account. In the post referenced above, the text accompanying the video stated “Downed a Syrian Helicopter then Looted all Intel and Weapons!” The video was publicly available on the Facebook account, and FBI obtained a copy of the video. The video shows a downed Syrian helicopter and depicts HARROUN riding in a jeep with other individuals wearing military-style clothing and in possession of weapons. HARROUN is celebrating in the video and makes statements in English in support of the downing of the helicopter.

That is, Harroun has very publicly performed Israel’s nightmare: anti-aircraft weapons on its northern border wielded by anti-Zionists threatening to head to Palestine next. By prosecuting him, are we pretending that our policy is not one that poses a risk to Israel.

Or maybe Harroun’s just in jail because the Fox article made it clear we’re actually arming the al-Nusrah Front?

Tweet about this on Twitter3Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook2Google+0Email to someone

One Response to Prosecuting Our Own Conspiracies

  • 1

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @mattapuzzo: DOJ considering whether to open broader civil rights investigation into Ferguson PD. No decision made, but DOJ's has been a…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @tonymess: We already know more in the past hour about a city of St. Louis police shooting than we do about one in #Ferguson 10 days ago.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This (and I know a couple of you at @Twitter are following)----> RT @erinscafe Twitter please stop fucking w/Twitter. http://t.co/JysxchES7x
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @LegallyErin But, if when you then get transcript (which you do here) if proffered material would have changed vot you have Motion to Remand
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @LegallyErin We have no absolute right here; but you can notice a request to either testify or have a proffer submitted. Usually they say no
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AllThingsHLS Sage reasoning. Truly. I've made a GJ demand to testify?submitted proffer a handful of times over many years. rarely good idea
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AlexLittleTN See why I now hate Federal court??
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @LegallyErin This says yes too http://t.co/Gfu9Rb0q8v but I don't find it in MO law (via lame ass Google search)
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @gnarlytrombone If they then do not, then you have an argument that the presentation was unfair and subject to potential remand.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @gnarlytrombone Here there is no absolute right, but you can request and demand to either appear or they enter your written proffer.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AllThingsHLS See? This shit is easy!
5hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930