Ten Human Rights Groups Unified in Opposition to Drone and/or Targeted Killing Court

A group of 10 human rights groups have written President Obama a letter calling for him to fulfill his State of the Union promise of more openness about drone and/or targeted killing.

The letter calls for obvious sorts of transparency (including the public release of all CIA, DOD, and DOJ documents pertaining to drone and/or targeted killing, as well as sharing of information Congress needs to conduct oversight) and warns that several of the interpretations adopted by the US (for example, its overly broad definition of imminence) don’t abide by international law.

But I’m most interested in this passage:

Judicial review is a central pillar of checks and balances. It is essential for accountability and transparency. Yet, the administration’s position is that judicial review is “not appropriate” in targeted killings cases and it has invoked broad interpretations of the political question and immunity doctrines, Bivens special factors, and the state secrets privilege to obstruct litigation.

We do not believe that accountability and transparency will be improved by recent proposals to establish a FISA-like court to sanction lethal targeting operations. On the contrary, a special targeted killing court would give a veneer of judicial review to decisions to launch lethal strikes without offering a meaningful check on executive power. Instead, we urge the administration to cease making broad claims of non-justiciability or political question, to prevent cases alleging human rights or constitutional violations from being heard on their merits. [my emphasis; footnotes removed]

That all 10 groups — including ACLU, Amnesty International, Center for Constitutional Rights, Human Rights First, Human Rights Watch, and Open Society Foundations, as well as some smaller institutions — would agree on this point makes a powerful statement. It denies the Administration of whatever sanction it hoped a drone and/or targeted killing court might give to their extrajudicial killing program.

The Administration is still more likely to be influenced by increased reporting on the lies they’ve been telling about the program than even these human rights groups. But it is important to see this unified statement undercutting the Administration’s (and Dianne Feinstein’s) efforts to make this program look better by burying it in a secret court.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

2 Responses to Ten Human Rights Groups Unified in Opposition to Drone and/or Targeted Killing Court

  • 1
  • 2
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @kevinjonheller Yeah, good here. Just sent you a DM
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @kevinjonheller How are you doing?? Safely ensconced in your new digs in London?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @WerlySportsLaw Heh, right. NFLPA was not totally stupid last time when they negotiated it away for other terms. The more things change....
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Some wild summer night thunder and rain tonight in the desert. Bring the rain.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JWGOP @AggieFootball Had lot better grip on ASU going into last yr. Can't tell if will be great or avg this yr. Hell of a first game though
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JWGOP @AggieFootball Loser owes Mex and margaritas next time we are proximate.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JWGOP @dick_nixon Wait....where did this come from??
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JWGOP @AggieFootball Gonna have a Devil of a time in the first game.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @DrTab3: NFL: Nothing to see here. Hey, look over there...deflategate! https://t.co/daLTK95QA1
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The NFL is pretty much just a parody troll at this point, insulting the intelligence of all in its path. https://t.co/XNxeJhh28y
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Rick_Geissal Up to this point possible Hillary grossly underdelivered on "official" emails. But she didn't. She clearly overproduced
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ChadLivengood @Todd_Courser Guarantee he's right. But how will he prove it?
3hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930