Claire McCaskill: Why Aren’t We Calling Sandy Hook Terror?

Janet Napolitano is testifying before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, purportedly on the budget. Not surprisingly, she’s getting a ton of questions about the Boston Marathon attack and immigration.

But in a smart series of questions that will undoubtedly be controversial, Claire McCaskill challenged Napolitano to explain why we so quickly called Boston a terrorist attack, but wouldn’t call Sandy Hook a terrorist attack. Noting that we still don’t know the motive behind either attack, McCaskill asked (these are my immediate transcriptions),

Other than weapon, is there any difference between Sandy Hook and Boston?

[snip]

We are so quick to call Boston terror, why aren’t we calling man w/high capacity magazine a terrorist?

[snip]

As I look at it w/eyes of prosecutor, I find it troubling that one is treated to cause so much more fear than other.

[snip]

It’s possible both had same motive, just one chose military weapon, the other chose homemade explosive.

It’s a provocative, but necessary question. The crime of terrorism relies on having a political motive. In both these attacks, we don’t know motive. But two days after Boston, we’re treating it as terrorism, while the attack that killed 20 children in their school still isn’t called such.

My inclination would be to call neither terrorism. McCaskill is right that the term just serves to generate fear.

But I’m glad she asked the question.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

7 Responses to Claire McCaskill: Why Aren’t We Calling Sandy Hook Terror?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV Groundhog Day. Train. Fade away. Train again. Rinse. Repeat. https://t.co/xrqmhJKFa0
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhilPerspective @R_Ephemeral @walterwkatz To paint the picture to explain the other conduct.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @regretblues Interesting. thanks.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @FSIStanford: Taubman: Presumably the Senate Intelligence Committee was aware of everything Snowden exposed. No, says Feinstein. #Securi
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @FSIStanford: Feinstein: We don't know who or how, but Leon Panetta had asked his staff to "assess" what our Intelligence Committee was …
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adambonin Yeah. I bet @ddayen could invent some competition that would distinguish Spelling wasp from fruit fly.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adambonin I'd say a POTUS debate but they'd look good by comparison, I guess.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adambonin Why not make them face off in skills neither is good at, like all good reality shows?
4hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Aaand there are now a ton of SD Police on motorcycles. Moving on to previously planned destination...
4hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Previous tweet: this is a demonstration against Border Patrol violence.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How can something as cutthroat as the Spelling Bee end in a tie? It's not right.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930