Claire McCaskill: Why Aren’t We Calling Sandy Hook Terror?

Janet Napolitano is testifying before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, purportedly on the budget. Not surprisingly, she’s getting a ton of questions about the Boston Marathon attack and immigration.

But in a smart series of questions that will undoubtedly be controversial, Claire McCaskill challenged Napolitano to explain why we so quickly called Boston a terrorist attack, but wouldn’t call Sandy Hook a terrorist attack. Noting that we still don’t know the motive behind either attack, McCaskill asked (these are my immediate transcriptions),

Other than weapon, is there any difference between Sandy Hook and Boston?

[snip]

We are so quick to call Boston terror, why aren’t we calling man w/high capacity magazine a terrorist?

[snip]

As I look at it w/eyes of prosecutor, I find it troubling that one is treated to cause so much more fear than other.

[snip]

It’s possible both had same motive, just one chose military weapon, the other chose homemade explosive.

It’s a provocative, but necessary question. The crime of terrorism relies on having a political motive. In both these attacks, we don’t know motive. But two days after Boston, we’re treating it as terrorism, while the attack that killed 20 children in their school still isn’t called such.

My inclination would be to call neither terrorism. McCaskill is right that the term just serves to generate fear.

But I’m glad she asked the question.

Tweet about this on Twitter22Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook11Google+4Email to someone

7 Responses to Claire McCaskill: Why Aren’t We Calling Sandy Hook Terror?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @chrisgeidner @ScottKGraham @GinnyLaRoe Probably true, but it was a really crappy opinion. Win, lose or draw I'd rather go with best opinion
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @chrisgeidner @ScottKGraham @GinnyLaRoe I would have much rather it gone up ala Walker than Reinhardts Romer bunk. Irrespective of SCOTUS.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ScottKGraham @GinnyLaRoe @chrisgeidner I'll never quite forgive him for that after Vaughn Walker had teed everything up so nicely in Perry
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ScottKGraham @GinnyLaRoe @chrisgeidner And yes, couldn't be more true. Good to hear Reinhardt say that after his goofy Perry opinion.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ScottKGraham @GinnyLaRoe @chrisgeidner Ah, okay, thanks. Was in court last tuesday and still haven't watched the video. I need to do that.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ScottKGraham @GinnyLaRoe @chrisgeidner Where did Reinhardt do that, in O/A?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @p2wy But, toddy?
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adamgoldmanwp Incorporate as a small town and I bet DHS will give you one cheap.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @RiosJose559: It is funny we talk about #ISIS western hostages while ppl in #Guantanamo have been held without evidence or charges for a…
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz "Offensive mastermind" Marc Trestman wasn't worth squat when he was OC with the Cardinals. He's worthless.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @JimWhiteGNV Listen up, as atty for Egghead+his doge, you need to back the fuck off! They plead the Fif! https://t.co/52HkrKDpZw
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV That has all the credibility of Roger Goodell.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930