Claire McCaskill: Why Aren’t We Calling Sandy Hook Terror?

Janet Napolitano is testifying before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, purportedly on the budget. Not surprisingly, she’s getting a ton of questions about the Boston Marathon attack and immigration.

But in a smart series of questions that will undoubtedly be controversial, Claire McCaskill challenged Napolitano to explain why we so quickly called Boston a terrorist attack, but wouldn’t call Sandy Hook a terrorist attack. Noting that we still don’t know the motive behind either attack, McCaskill asked (these are my immediate transcriptions),

Other than weapon, is there any difference between Sandy Hook and Boston?

[snip]

We are so quick to call Boston terror, why aren’t we calling man w/high capacity magazine a terrorist?

[snip]

As I look at it w/eyes of prosecutor, I find it troubling that one is treated to cause so much more fear than other.

[snip]

It’s possible both had same motive, just one chose military weapon, the other chose homemade explosive.

It’s a provocative, but necessary question. The crime of terrorism relies on having a political motive. In both these attacks, we don’t know motive. But two days after Boston, we’re treating it as terrorism, while the attack that killed 20 children in their school still isn’t called such.

My inclination would be to call neither terrorism. McCaskill is right that the term just serves to generate fear.

But I’m glad she asked the question.

Twitter22Reddit0Facebook11Google+4Email

7 Responses to Claire McCaskill: Why Aren’t We Calling Sandy Hook Terror?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @ZaidJilani Slime finds its own common lowest level, and so it has here.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @GitmoWatch: BREAKING: Newly detailed #DOJ Special Trial Counsel asks to stop #Guantanamo proceedings on #FBI spying inquiry; live-tweet…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Nice take by @pareene on the ill informed jerk that is Susana Martinex GOP darling governor of NM http://t.co/sUiVye0Dwv via @Salon
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Crazy!---> When a favorite/retweet is a legal waiver of substantive due process rights http://t.co/cGHLWpIeKp (h/t @AdamSerwer )
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @AdamSerwer: What General Mills is doing is absolutely BANANAS and the Roberts Court will sanction it without a second thought http://t.…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AdamSerwer Can't tell if you are joking or not. But Roberts Court, thru Concepcion and other cases, very friendly to this kind of bullshit
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @marcorandazza @ScottGreenfield @dailydot @ma_franks That certainly works. But her intransigence if face of Constit args pretty exacerbated.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @MikeScarcella: ACLU wants judge to unseal Justice Dept. gag order requests targeting Twitter, Yahoo. Filed tonight in DC: http://t.co/P
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @marcorandazza @ScottGreenfield @dailydot Pernicious bullshit by @ma_franks
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @phoenixnewtimes: Hopi Medicine Man Ivan Jackson Sentenced to One Year in Prison for Oral Sex with Patient http://t.co/944yyA5qup
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @banditelli @PhilPerspective Surfer Banditelli
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MonaHol @ggreenwald @davebabler @bobcesca_go Wait, no links to this brilliance?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2013
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930