Transpartisan Arguments the Government Won’t Want to Succeed

Justin Amash, Paul Broun, Tulsi Gabbard, Morgan Griffith, Rush Holt, Walter Jones, Barbara Lee, Zoe Lofgren, Thomas Massie, Tom McClintock, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Beto O’Rourke, Steve Pearce, Matt Salmon, Mark Sanford, Ted Yoho.

Well, that’s got to be a group of people the Powers That Be don’t want to see joining together?

Captain Tulsi Gabbard, Physics PhD Rush Holt, Appalachian Trail Hiker Mark Sanford, and Paleocon Walter Jones. With my libertarian Congressman, Justin Amash apparently leading the bunch.

All on a court motion together, calling for the court to release the FISC opinion explaining why the government’s Section 702 collection was unconstitutional because without it they can’t do their job. Which includes, in part, informing the American people.

As important, whatever information Members of Congress learn about secret FISC opinions and orders, they are unable publicly to discuss or debate them because any disclosure is still subject to secrecy requirements.

[snip]

In light of recent disclosures regarding the existence of a “classified intelligence program,” related to the “business records” section of FISA, the Director of National Intelligence has acknowledged that “it is important for the American people to understand” the limits of the program and the principles behind it.

[snip]

Notwithstanding the compelling public interest in an open debate about the scope and propriety of government surveillance programs authorized under FISA, even the amici — Members of the U.S. Congress — cannot meaningfully participate in that public debate so long as this Court’s relevant decisions and interpretations of law remain secret. They cannot engage in public discussion on the floor of the Senate and the House about the government’s surveillance programs. And they cannot engage in dialogue with their constituents on these pressing matters of public importance.

[snip]

Informed, public debate is central to Congress’s role as a coequal branch of the federal government. The Constitution acknowledges the unique importance of open debate to Congress’s role in the Speech or Debate Clause. Debate in Congress serves no only the institution’s internal goal of creating sound public policy. Courts have recognized a second crucial purpose of informed, public debate in Congress: to inform the American people about the issues affecting their government.

Now, I think they may overestimate the degree to which this opinion pertains to the Section 215 collection (indeed, if it pertains to Internet metadata collection, it pertains to Section 214 of PATRIOT instead). [Update, 9/13/13: I’m mistaken here–it was exclusively Section 215.]

And I think their Speech or Debate argument has confused people about whether these members of Congress have seen what’s in the opinion. Holt used to be on the House Intelligence Committee, but no longer is, so I assume none of the Members on this brief know what the opinion is. In any case, the House has much more restrictive rules about who can access intelligence secrets than the Senate.

But I am rather fond of the argument that Congress can’t do its job with all the secrecy the Executive is operating under.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

7 Responses to Transpartisan Arguments the Government Won’t Want to Succeed

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel "countries w/o constitutional torture bans have actually engaged in less torture over this time period" http://t.co/J6bozdqCCQ
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "In 2011, of 107 democracies in existence, 40 frequently engaged in torture & another 41 occasionally engaged in" it http://t.co/J6bozdqCCQ
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Just a couple!!?!? Who do you know to get that kind of treatment?!?! @Bencjacobs
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 And is necessarily more closely tied in with NSA spying.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @brettmaxkaufman They could have at least given Iraq morphine before they set to work. @charlie_savage
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 The Governor has at least one more pothole to fill before his work as Governor is done. http://t.co/iRZ2LaZvS2 @Bencjacobs
22mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Rancho Notorious currently on TMC. An oddly different and awesome western starring....Marlene Dietrich. Wonder if @SunsetGunShot is watching
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Ah yes, @nycsouthpaw got the screen cap I should have of @howardfineman's timeline on the HELL that is WHCD #NerdProm http://t.co/LAC978sEUt
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @xposefacts: 'Government’s Own Witness Debunks Government’s “Overwrought Hyperbole” in Sterling Case' https://t.co/SFRkW2CVXk @emptywheel
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhilPerspective @emptywheel Oh, that clown car is in a big tent. Plenty of room!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
July 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031