Ignatius Has Become a “Choice between Security and Privacy” Stenographer

David Ignatius should be ashamed about this column. Even by his standards, it serves simply as stenography for the buzzwords top security officials have fed him, such that he repeats lines like this without any critical thinking.

Gen. Keith Alexander and other top NSA officials are considering ways they could reassure the public without damaging key programs, according to U.S. officials. They think that forcing Congress to decide between security and privacy is an unfair choice, since the country would lose either way. They’d like an agreement that protects both, but that’s a tall order. [my emphasis]

Remember: we’re talking about the Section 215 dragnet, not the (according to all players) far more valuable Section 702 collection. Even according to the government, it has only come into play in 13 terrorist cases. The only one the government can describe where it has been crucial involves indicting a man the FBI determined was not motivated by terrorism but rather tribal affiliation sending less than $10,000 to al-Shabaab three and a half years earlier.

And yet Ignatius uncritically repeats that requiring the government to use more specificity with its collections would present Congress the “unfair choice” of “deciding between security and privacy.”

So it should be no surprise that Ignatius uncritically repeats other details of the program. For example, Ignatius claims this involves only two-hop analysis, when we know it can go three hops (and therefore millions of people) deep.

When the agency identifies a suspicious number in, say, Pakistan, analysts want to see who that person called in the United States and who, in turn, might have been contacted by that second person.

Ignatius doesn’t note the descriptions — from both Edward Snowden and James Clapper — that they then use this metadata to index previously collected communications. That’s because he’s too busy repeating that we don’t “record” these collections, as if we’d have to.

Then finally there’s Ignatius’ claim that SWIFT (the record of international financial transfers) presents a viable alternative to the dragnet program. As I have reported, when the EU finally got to audit what the US had been doing with SWIFT, they discovered the real content of the queries was transmitted verbally, making it impossible to audit the use.

Thus far, no one has explained whether the queries and underlying articulable suspicion gets automatically recorded or — as happened with one of the precursors to this program — manually in hardcopy form. If it’s the latter (which I will assume until someone asserts differently) it is prone to the same kind of large scale documentation lapses that could hide a great deal of improper use of the dragnet. Which, given Ron Wyden and Mark Udall’s insistence that the problems have been more problematic than James Clapper lets on, could well be the case.

All of these are issues anyone with Ignatius’ access might want to answer.

Alternately, that access may now serve to do no more than produce “security or privacy” automatons, repeating the obviously false cant Ignatius has here.

 

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

19 Responses to Ignatius Has Become a “Choice between Security and Privacy” Stenographer

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Apparently the FBI is better than the bad guys at running porn site. Something they're good at! https://t.co/ppCW1tgry9
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Why oh why DOJ stupid enough to give @_rshapiro oppty to question if they've been providing fraudulent responses? https://t.co/6fWiUiQwGR
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Glitchy_Ashburn Neither. GOP Conventions have just always been very big events for sex workers. Wondering if it'll hurt their business
54mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sbagen In fairness, looks like appeal was under briefed as to issues, but the record was there for the SCOAZ to be, ahem, more enlightened.
55mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Indeed. And this is exactly the kind of BS libertarian friends of mine swore Bolick would be great on. https://t.co/M1LtSl9Ymo
57mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz New AZ Supreme Ct Justice Clint Bolick pens a jackass decision overturning a proper COA opinion+ratifies sting https://t.co/oqNLdnux3K (2/2)
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Local "drug task force" runs an asinine sting on legal medical marijuana operation+sandbags a Dr. on his affidavit (1/2)
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV On behalf of all the people currently on lockdown, once again it's time to say Fuck the @NRA.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @onekade: Lots of funding for biometrics in MI budget, including tracking recipients of home health care. https://t.co/ApkD2saM8k @empty
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @pwnallthethings @csoghoian Didn't actually take them seriously, but spooks bitching abt Trump seem to have no interest in his comm security
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @wizardkitten: Corruption, Panama Papers... BUT WHAT ABOUT THE TACO BOWL TWEET? #aaargh
2hreplyretweetfavorite
July 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031