DOJ’s IG Hints at Concerns about Back Door Search Issues

In addition to focusing on whether the classification of past IG Reports will limit what he can release about the Section 215 dragnet and Section 702 content collection, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz laid out one more significant civil liberties concern related to national security investigations.

Additional concerns about civil rights and liberties are likely to arise in the future. For example, significant public attention has been paid to programs authorizing the acquisition of national security information, but relatively less has been paid to the storing, handling, and use of that information. Yet after information has been lawfully collected for one investigation, crucial questions arise about whether and how that information may be stored, shared, and used in support of subsequent investigations. Similar questions arise about the impact on civil rights and liberties of conducting electronic searches of national security information and about whether and how information obtained in a national security context can be used for criminal law enforcement. As the Department continues to acquire, store, and use national security information, these issues will arise more and more frequently, and the Department must ensure that civil rights and liberties are not transgressed.

I don’t guarantee this is a reference to back door searches.

But we know that FBI has been permitted to conduct searches on content collected under traditional FISA or FISA Amendments Act since at least 2008. We know that the Intelligence Community does not believe it needs even Reasonable Articulable Suspicion — of a national security concern or of a crime — to search this data. And in the past, DOJ has argued it can use FISA-collected information to find things like evidence of rape to use to coerce people to turn informant.

So I’m going to wildarseguess that at least part of what Horowitz alludes to here pertains to whether DOJ can search this incidentally collected information in support of criminal investigations. That would of course violate the spirit of every wiretap law in the country, but given the government’s past interpretations of what the elimination of the wall between NSA and FBI means and their claims they don’t need RAS to search these databases, it is a real possibility that’s what they doing (though they may be claiming that the crimes in question are “related” to the national security claims — things like money laundering and drug sales and so forth).

I’m also interested in Horowitz’ allusion to “national security information.” Does this go beyond content? Is he worried about the use of bulk-collected data in criminal investigations?

OK, now he’s got me worried.

But note what he doesn’t say: that he’s investigating this.

Tweet about this on Twitter13Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook2Google+0Email to someone

4 Responses to DOJ’s IG Hints at Concerns about Back Door Search Issues

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @normative It's a lot easier with 10s of numbers rather than bulkier ones. http://t.co/foPLKYVZQb "ha ha ha is wery important."
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @normative When I started using the Count to count drone memo requests to Obama it was a big hit, I'll say that.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel John Kerry: I didn't REALLY ask that nice Bibi fella to the prom. We still might talk about it. Or glance meaningfully at each other.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen I know @laRosalind is a ukulele fan.
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel US Diplomats playing "hide the client" with Sharif Mobley's British lawyer. http://t.co/8b1MvMdm0h
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is there a word for the last tab you open that makes all of them blend into infinity? Always takes closing 8 to back off of infinity, too.
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @p2wy AKA, "We've got a babysitter and we're going to live it up!" @ReserveGR @april_anita
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Trialinsider @AppellateDaily This is Ken Peasley's case, right? Hate to speak ill of the dead, but Peasley was a snake.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @conor64: Daniel Ellsberg: "Snowden was the one person in the fucking NSA who did what he absolutely should have done.” http://t.co/XL7R
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Multied But tunnels were fair game, no? @mattduss
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ahmadmzaghal If "we" includes John Kerry, then no. He's going to keep pretending @Netanyahu is a good faith broker.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @WinWithoutWar: #Iraq War Powers Res passes 370-40!!!!!!! Congress sends clear message: NO NEW #IRAQ WAR! http://t.co/mw9nZ28FfP
1hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2013
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031