Say, Why Should Mikey Hayden Get a Say on Torture that Purportedly Preceded Him?

My favorite call for John Brennan’s head thus far comes from Fred Fleitz, who helped John Bolton sex up WMD claims leading into the Iraq War.  He says John Brennan has to resign not just to shore up CIA’s relations with Congress, but also NSA’s.

I believe CIA director John Brennan and agency officials involved in the monitoring of computers used by the SSCI staff must resign to help mend the CIA’s relationship with Congress. Such resignations would go a long way toward restoring the confidence of the SSCI in the CIA and, it is to be hoped, would win the agency and the National Security Agency some crucial allies in both houses of Congress to fend off several ill-advised intelligence-reform proposals currently under discussion there.

But that’s not my favorite part. Nor is where this “intelligence” professional says a report voted out with support from John McCain (in the first vote) and Susan Collins (in the second) is a Democratic vote. Nor is the bit where Fleitz claims the program was properly briefed, which it wasn’t.

My favorite part is Fleitz’ conflicting claims about Michael Hayden.

The main focus of the SSCI probe reportedly is to prove Democratic claims that the effectiveness of the enhanced-interrogation program has been exaggerated. Former CIA director Michael Hayden and other former senior CIA officials involved in the enhanced-interrogation program dispute this. According to Hayden, as late as 2006 fully half of the government’s knowledge about the structure and activities of al-Qaeda came from harsh interrogations.

Despite their firsthand knowledge of the enhanced-interrogation program, there is no input in the SSCI report from Hayden, former CIA general counsel John Rizzo, or other CIA officials, since the report is based solely on an examination of documents.

Assertion 1) Michael Hayden claims half of the government’s knowledge about al Qaeda came from torture, meaning no more than half came from the illegal torture he was conducting at the time over at NSA (and also meaning that relatively more intelligence has come in from SIGINT since Hayden left).

Assertion 2) Michael Hayden, whose entire CIA tenure post-dated the Detainee Treatment Act that made the torture program illegal, should have some say in a torture report.

Maybe Hayden was spying on the CIA while he was in charge of NSA. Or maybe (ok, in fact) Hayden continued torture after such time as Congress made it doubly illegal.

But in the same way that Cofer Black should not need to have a say in torture if the CIA’s false narrative were not false, Michael Hayden shouldn’t either.

Man, as much as this report is demonstrating how much CIA lies and how useless their torture program was, it also demonstrates the misnomer of the whole “intelligence” label.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Say, Why Should Mikey Hayden Get a Say on Torture that Purportedly Preceded Him?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @lrozen He did that very early on, in opening minutes, and it came off MUCH better. Was actually pretty touching.
bmaz RT @USDroneWarDept: Shilling is such a douchebag.
bmaz @armandodkos GO SEE HIM. You will have the same ultimate opinion, but a far better understanding of the Bern. Seriously. Do it.
bmaz RT @armandodkos: This but not reducible to soundbite.
bmaz @armandodkos @LemieuxLGM Mets are Berning?
bmaz Hey @ESPN, congratulations on your relentless ignorant asshole bigot @gehrig38
bmaz Rickey Henderson likes this:
bmaz RT @DanCBarr: So now that Bernie wiped out the email discussion, Hillary is taking control of this debate.
bmaz @lrozen You should see him live in one of his 50-60 min speeches. No notes, No Prompter. Just rolls. His ground crew superb too. Seriously
bmaz @astepanovich Seriously!
bmaz RT @astepanovich: What the actual fuck.
August 2014
« Jul   Sep »