Ashcroft, Comey, Goldsmith, and Baker: “All” Is the “Best” Reading of “Relevant”

Four MusketeersTowards the end of the Memorandum of Law in support of the Internet dragnet — which was signed by those guys ———-> — DOJ makes a claim that its reading of “relevant” to mean “almost all” was the best possible reading.

Here, by contrast, reading the term “relevant” to permit the collection of this critical information during wartime is a construction rooted in the text that requires no stretching of the ordinary meaning of the terms of the statute at all. In fact, for all the reasons outlined above, interpreting section 402 to authorize the collection the Government has requested in the best reading of the plain terms of the Act.

This is why you should not have secret courts.

I get making an aggressive push to authorize dragnet surveillance.

I get mining old and foreign dictionaries to come up with a definition that suits your needs.

But after you’ve made your best ditch effort to stretch the meaning of words, secretly, beyond all recognition, don’t then, secretly, pat yourself on the back pretending that wasn’t the game you just pulled.

But hey. Who’s the chump? After all, we now know that Misters Ashcroft, Comey, Goldsmith, and Baker pulled this off.

Yet no one is making any effort to put the English language back on some kind of sane footing. Nothing in any of the “reform” efforts before Congress attempts to put sanity back into the word “relevant.”

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Ashcroft, Comey, Goldsmith, and Baker: “All” Is the “Best” Reading of “Relevant”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel Gonna send you some Boxcar Willie albums!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @kirkmurphy: If any of #GOPDebate were my patients my license would be revoked for incompetence. https://t.co/AsuBSzzmhr
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel But just winds? No trains? In that vein, there are No Trains To Heaven, you know https://t.co/3elkVGixH0
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz So all the schlubs but Trump were out shaking hands and kibitzing on stage in afterglow, and Trumpster was gone baby gone??
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JONF34 I'm saying at least 20 years late. Long enough that that wet behind the ears probie doesn't even understand.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RubioBot2000 still doesn't grok that the New American Century Project is so late 90's.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel FWIW, I don't think even Sri would get through. Though, honestly, the GOP would prob be smart to confirm such a nom.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel Girl, go wash everything out stat. Are you by the water currently??
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RubioBot2000 coughs up some Reagan hairballs
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @ddayen Uh, where I come from, a $300 bottle of Chandon is actually called Dom.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Rubio "You can't have free enterprise w/o anti-poverty programs." That's a curious claim. Also invokes Nikki Haley.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Cruz: would appoint Mike Luttig.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2014
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31