Afghanistan Bars Rosenberg From Leaving Over Times Report on Coup Plan

With the latest deadline for Afghanistan to resolve its election crisis and put into place a government that can sign a Bilateral Security Agreement now only two weeks from tomorrow (when the NATO Summit convenes in Wales), the pressure on Afghan officials is leading to breakdowns on many fronts. Violence continues in the vote recount process and sniping back and forth in the press over outright insurrection is reaching new levels (note in this article that Abdullah supporters are favoring power sharing while Ghani’s side is pushing the constitution, suggesting Ghani feels confident of winning the recount).

Against this uncertain background, Matthew Rosenberg’s story published late Monday on the New York Times website and appearing in Tuesday’s paper (on page A7, not very prominent placement) remarkably led to him being summoned and questioned by the attorney general’s office in Afghanistan. Further, it appears that Rosenberg will not be allowed to leave the country until he answers questions (he has refused so far) regarding the sources for his article.

The article that has upset the attorney general states that various unnamed government figures are floating the idea of an interim government since the election recount is taking so long to resolve. (Note that Hamid Karzai’s term in office already has officially expired.) Although the plan is referred to as a “soft coup”, the idea is that there would be a quick return to democracy. Further, Rosenberg goes to great lengths to point out that the entire exercise seems to be more of a warning to the Abdullah and Ghani camps to resolve things quickly rather than an actual attempt to seize power:

A coterie of powerful Afghan government ministers and officials with strong ties to the security forces are threatening to seize power if an election impasse that has paralyzed the country is not resolved soon.

Though it is unusual to telegraph plans for what could amount to a coup — though no one is calling it that — the officials all stressed that they hoped the mere threat of forming an interim government would persuade the country’s rival presidential candidates, Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani, to make the compromises needed to end the crisis.

The Times describes Rosenberg’s treatment during the questioning:

The senior prosecutor who summoned Mr. Rosenberg, Gen. Sayed Noorullah Sadat, whose title is general director of crimes against external and internal security, asked him to identify anonymous government sources quoted in the article, which he declined to do.

Mr. Rosenberg objected to General Sadat’s insistence that he sign a statement without a lawyer present. Mr. Rosenberg then asked to leave the interrogation room and was initially refused permission to do so, until the prosecutors conferred with a higher-ranking official.

They declined to name that official. “It’s a confidential source,” said another general who was present at the interrogation. He declined to give his own name as well, but was later identified as Gen. Abdul Salem Ismat, who works in General Sadat’s directorate. (Although the attorney general’s office is a civilian agency, some officials retain the ranks they gained in police or military agencies.)

The attorney general’s office is on very shaky ground here:

During the interrogation on Tuesday, General Sadat was unable to name any criminal offense that was under investigation, or cite any laws that had been broken.

“Right now, there’s no case, no legal charges, there’s nothing,” he said. But he did not rule out the possibility of charges in the future.

The State Department criticized the Afghanistan government’s actions.

Hmm. No offense under investigation, no law broken, no case, no charges, and yet Rosenberg was brought in. I’m guessing the State Department criticism was something along the lines of “Who do you think you are, Ferguson?” At least he wasn’t teargassed.

Update: Just after this was posted, it was announced that Rosenberg has now been expelled from Afghanistan:

The attorney general of Afghanistan on Wednesday ordered the expulsion of an American correspondent for The New York Times, Matthew Rosenberg, and banned him from re-entering the country.

Tweet about this on Twitter9Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook5Google+0Email to someone

3 Responses to Afghanistan Bars Rosenberg From Leaving Over Times Report on Coup Plan

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @SusieMadrak: America, where a golden bull is protected by cops against protesters who might hurt capitalism's feelings. #FloodWallStreet
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 Well, we will, bc in addition to those 20 people 20 Khorasan people want to give double agents ineffective bombs like AQAP
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mtill50 Went on riff earlier abt FAA's veto of drone for Sat game responsible for embarrassing loss https://t.co/dvozU2eMo7 @robertcaruso
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ZoeTillman: Here's the motion asking a Va. judge to dismiss the Washington football team's lawsuit challenging trademark ruling http://…
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @andreaprasow Mail covers to people who aren't sworn to confidentiality seem to take longer than they used to. @Krhawkins5 @just_security
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @MikeScarcella: "When a suspect says 'give me a lawyer,' that request walks, swims, and quacks like a duck." 9th Cir. today: http://t.co
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @robertcaruso If U Michigan had an A-10 would its football team be any good?
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel That's what I would do if I were Bob Litt or David Addington.
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel So NSA gets FISCR opinion saying reasonable to search for terror/nuke proliferators w/in US, only then adds "anyone w/tie to foreign govt"?
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Wondering whether NSA added its 3rd certification (prolly the Foreign Govt one) after the Yahoo decision gave them cert-free approval.
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade I wasn't that cool, is part of my point. That it did make the diff in me being valedictorian, to great shame of my school.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
August 2014
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31