The Kronos Needle in the AlphaBay Haystack

To set up a future post (see my earlier posts here and here), I want to show how remarkable it is that the Feds decided to prosecute Marcus Hutchins, a guy who allegedly contributed code to a piece of malware sold in June 2015 for $2,000 on AlphaBay, out of all the illicit sales they might have chosen to prosecute in the month after taking the site down.

First, let’s look at the Alexandre Cazes indictment, sworn by a Fresno Grand Jury on June 1, 2017, 41 days before the Hutchins indictment. It lists the following illicitly sold goods.

  • Redacted month 2015, redacted vendor sells a false driver license to an undercover officer in CA
  • Redacted month 2015, redacted vendor sells an ATM skimmer to an undercover officer in CA
  • Redacted month 2015, redacted vendor sells an ATM skimmer to an undercover officer in CA
  • December 29, 2015, vendor CC4L sells marijuana to MG, an undercover officer, which is mailed from Merced to Buffalo
  • Redacted short month date 2016, redacted vendor sells marijuana to an undercover officer, which is mailed from Los Angeles to a redacted city
  • Redacted month 2016, redacted vendor sells a false driver license to an undercover officer in CA
  • Redacted month 2016, redacted vendor sells a false driver license to an undercover officer in CA
  • Redacted month 2016, redacted vendor sells a false driver license to an undercover officer in CA
  • May 16, 2016, vendor A51 sells heroin to an undercover officer, which is mailed from Brooklyn to Fresno
  • May 24, 2016, vendor A51 sells heroin to an undercover officer, which is mailed from Brooklyn to Fresno
  • October 20, 2016, vendor BSB sells heroin and fentanyl to an undercover officer, which is mailed from San Francisco to Fresno
  • Redacted (short month) date 2017, redacted vendor sells meth to an undercover officer, which is mailed between two CA cities

The sale of a piece of malware for $2,000 on June 11, 2015 would be earlier than most of those listed in the indictment that brought AlphaBay’s operator down. And while there are several ATM skimmers listed (a violation of 18 USC 1029) there is no malware listed (in two of Hutchins’ charges listed as violations of 18 USC 1030, the CFAA statute).

Now look at the overall numbers FBI boasted for AlphaBay when it announced its takedown on July 20, nine days after the indictment targeting Hutchins.

AlphaBay reported that it serviced more than 200,000 users and 40,000 vendors. Around the time of takedown, the site had more than 250,000 listings for illegal drugs and toxic chemicals, and more than 100,000 listings for stolen and fraudulent identification documents, counterfeit goods, malware and other computer hacking tools, firearms, and fraudulent services. By comparison, the Silk Road dark market—the largest such enterprise of its kind before it was shut down in 2013—had approximately 14,000 listings.

The operation to seize AlphaBay’s servers was led by the FBI and involved the cooperative efforts of law enforcement agencies in Thailand, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Canada, the United Kingdom, and France, along with the European law enforcement agency Europol.

“Conservatively, several hundred investigations across the globe were being conducted at the same time as a result of AlphaBay’s illegal activities,” Phirippidis said. “It really took an all-hands effort among law enforcement worldwide to deconflict and protect those ongoing investigations.”

Of the 40,000 vendors charged within a month of takedown, of the 250K drug listings and the 100K fraudulent services listings, the guy who sold Kronos once for $2,000 (whom Tom Fox-Brewster thinks might be a guy named VinnyK) — and by virtue of American conspiracy laws, Hutchins — were among the first 20 or so known to be charged for using AlphaBay.

Admittedly, we’re seeing EDCA’s sales in Cazes’ indictment because they had the lead on the overall takedown. Perhaps EDWI has 1,000 more malware buys it will get around to charging, as soon as its perpetrators decide to come to the US, as Hutchins did.

But put in this light, it looks even more remarkable how quickly they got around to arresting to the alleged co-conspirator of a guy who sold a piece of malware.

image_print
12 replies
  1. Rugger9 says:

    Well, either this is venue shopping or it’s real.  However  our legal beagles should do a primer on what is necessary to establish venue in cases like this that now cross CA’s 9th with whatever appellate district WI is in (too lazy to look it up) which to me almost guarantees a SCOTUS trip if these districts disagree.

    Why risk that now? If there is no venue (meaning I would think no tort to pursue) Hutchins’ lawyers get it tossed at the first hearing.

    • emptywheel says:

      Don’t get confused by my listing of the purchases listed in an ED CA indictment as a sense of what crimes they used to charge the AlphaBay founder (or help me understand how I need to make that more clear).

      All I’m doing with those is showing, here’s what the emphasis was (on CA based crimes bc CA based indictment).

    • SpaceLifeForm says:

      Wisconsin in 7th District. Includes Illinois and Indiana. Do not see any disagreements with regard to 9th District.

      • bmaz says:

        7th Circuit! A little uneven occasionally, but not a bad circuit at all. Chief Judge Diane Wood is truly excellent.

    • SpaceLifeForm says:

      As to venue shopping, it probably gets down to a LE/IC agent that was allegedly in that venue that ‘detected’ the alleged crime.

      Even though all the telcos/isps provide proxy services for LE/IC See NSLs.

      LE/IC can basically appear on the net to be coming from any geographic area, the ip address in server logs can not be relied upon.

      It is not evidence of geographic location of the agent. It is only evidence of activity.

      Note that while there are plenty of people in DOJ and FBI that believe that venue shopping is petfectly fine, SCOTUS recently ruled that companies (not individuals) should have home field advantage when it comes to patents.

      Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC

    • Rugger9 says:

      Emptywheel – OK, thanks.

      WW – Perhaps but such negotiations are best done in private, since the intended marks targeted by Hutchins’ information really should not know who has already been compromised.  If it’s about Hutchins, then he might as well be charged now since he’s been hauled in quite publicly.

  2. lefty665 says:

    It will be interesting to hear when you get more insight into why Wisconsin for this charge, and why this now.

    You make the ferry to get to today’s hearing?

     

  3. SpaceLifeForm says:

    Marcy, strongly recommended edit:

    s/the guy who sold/the guy who allegedly sold/

    Sorry, but I am certain BMAZ will agree.

    Even though we do not know the redacted person with certainty at this point, this is for future.

Comments are closed.