AACPR

Pakistan Supreme Court Condemns Indefinite Detention Without Charges

While the US enters its eleventh year of maintaining the Guantanamo Prison that Barack Obama pledged to close by the end of 2009, Pakistan now finds itself in the glare of international condemnation for its own practice of indefinite detention without charges. Just last month, Amnesty International released a report (pdf) in which they pointed out widespread torture and abuse in Pakistan’s tribal areas while prisoners are held by the military and intelligence agency without charges:

Amnesty International research shows that, rather than seeking to apply and strengthen the human rights safeguards of Pakistan’s ordinary criminal justice system in the Tribal Areas, the Pakistani authorities are applying old and new security laws that authorise prolonged, arbitrary, preventive detention by the Armed Forces, and breach international human rights law. The Actions (in Aid of Civil Power) Regulations 2011 (AACPR) in particular, along with the century-old Frontier Crimes Regulation 1901 (FCR),5 provide a framework for widespread human rights violations to occur with impunity.

Both the AACPR and FCR come into play in a case argued today in Pakistan’s Supreme Court. From Reuters, we learn that although this case addresses just 11 men (now 7 due to four deaths, more on that later), the government now admits that over 700 are being held without charges:

Pakistan is holding 700 suspected Islamist militants without charge under a law that has come under fire from human rights groups, its attorney general said on Thursday.

The admission marked the first time that the strategic U.S. ally detailed how many militants it is holding in the tribal areas of the northwest under the Actions in Aid of Civil Power Regulations law.

“There is a military operation in Waziristan. Under the law we cannot try these 700 people, nor can we release them, unless the operation is over,” Attorney General Irfan Qadir told the Supreme Court, referring to a tribal area near the Afghan border.

The Reuters report, however, seems to miss the mark on several important issues in this story. First, Reuters says the case is about “seven suspected militants held without charge since May 2010″. Both Dawn and the Express Tribune point out in their stories today that the case originated with 11 men. Here is how Dawn describes that part of the background:

The 11 prisoners in the said case went missing from the gate of Rawalpindi’s Adiyala Jail on May 29, 2010 after they had been acquitted of terrorism charges pertaining to their alleged involvement in the October 2009 attacks on the Army General Headquarters and the Inter-Services Intelligence’s (ISI) Hamza Camp in the garrison town.

Later, four of the 11 died in mysterious circumstances. The Supreme Court forced the ISI and military intelligence to produce the remaining seven men in court on February 13 — an unprecedented move. The men, all in deteriorating health, were sent to the Lady Reading Hospital in Peshawar on court orders. After five of them recovered, they were shifted to an internment centre in Parachinar.

The other point that Reuters seems to miss comes when Reuters says of the men that the “Supreme Court is calling for their release” while it appears on closer reading of the Pakistani press that the “release” is from military detention into the hands of civilian authorities who would then try the men. Here is the Express Tribune: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV Just move the @ from my handle to right and add "http://t.co/fDk8dRrFUn". @SunSportsFOXFL @SunSportsRays #TuneInRays https://t.co/05KiMB6SPD
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Judge John O'Donnell clearly intent on filibustering this bullshit acquittal so long that Cleveland is too exhausted to riot.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @arcsine @PogoWasRight Explanation by court on a verdict from trial to court not rare, but this is just nuts.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Don't know that that is 100% fair, this was also a product of completely asinine non-charging by prosecutors https://t.co/uGPeNjb4hW
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Message to cops from Cleveland: The more crazed homicidal cops you have shooting, with more bullets, more likely are to get off scot free
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @APribetic @PogoWasRight @Popehat Kind of a giveaway when started quoting Scalia on police shootings earlier
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Popehat This prick is gonna filibuster his way out on the assault too.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Apparently. may get tagged with assault though. But I bet Judge O'Donnell walks out of that too https://t.co/WlVXuD6XuE
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Judge John O'Donnell's rambling explanation is just ridiculous+self contradictory. What a load of shit. Boo on the lame prosecution+court
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Sure strongly looks that way so far. https://t.co/xynGZhsRU9
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz And THAT is how prosecution rigged the Brelo trial: can't prove Brelo shots were death shots. Looks like acquittal https://t.co/WnIlVGUyH7
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Aw shit, there it is: "The parties' experts differ" https://t.co/2TKnnovTXp
26mreplyretweetfavorite
May 2015
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31