Actions (in Aid of Civil Power) Regulations

Pakistan Supreme Court Condemns Indefinite Detention Without Charges

While the US enters its eleventh year of maintaining the Guantanamo Prison that Barack Obama pledged to close by the end of 2009, Pakistan now finds itself in the glare of international condemnation for its own practice of indefinite detention without charges. Just last month, Amnesty International released a report (pdf) in which they pointed out widespread torture and abuse in Pakistan’s tribal areas while prisoners are held by the military and intelligence agency without charges:

Amnesty International research shows that, rather than seeking to apply and strengthen the human rights safeguards of Pakistan’s ordinary criminal justice system in the Tribal Areas, the Pakistani authorities are applying old and new security laws that authorise prolonged, arbitrary, preventive detention by the Armed Forces, and breach international human rights law. The Actions (in Aid of Civil Power) Regulations 2011 (AACPR) in particular, along with the century-old Frontier Crimes Regulation 1901 (FCR),5 provide a framework for widespread human rights violations to occur with impunity.

Both the AACPR and FCR come into play in a case argued today in Pakistan’s Supreme Court. From Reuters, we learn that although this case addresses just 11 men (now 7 due to four deaths, more on that later), the government now admits that over 700 are being held without charges:

Pakistan is holding 700 suspected Islamist militants without charge under a law that has come under fire from human rights groups, its attorney general said on Thursday.

The admission marked the first time that the strategic U.S. ally detailed how many militants it is holding in the tribal areas of the northwest under the Actions in Aid of Civil Power Regulations law.

“There is a military operation in Waziristan. Under the law we cannot try these 700 people, nor can we release them, unless the operation is over,” Attorney General Irfan Qadir told the Supreme Court, referring to a tribal area near the Afghan border.

The Reuters report, however, seems to miss the mark on several important issues in this story. First, Reuters says the case is about “seven suspected militants held without charge since May 2010″. Both Dawn and the Express Tribune point out in their stories today that the case originated with 11 men. Here is how Dawn describes that part of the background:

The 11 prisoners in the said case went missing from the gate of Rawalpindi’s Adiyala Jail on May 29, 2010 after they had been acquitted of terrorism charges pertaining to their alleged involvement in the October 2009 attacks on the Army General Headquarters and the Inter-Services Intelligence’s (ISI) Hamza Camp in the garrison town.

Later, four of the 11 died in mysterious circumstances. The Supreme Court forced the ISI and military intelligence to produce the remaining seven men in court on February 13 — an unprecedented move. The men, all in deteriorating health, were sent to the Lady Reading Hospital in Peshawar on court orders. After five of them recovered, they were shifted to an internment centre in Parachinar.

The other point that Reuters seems to miss comes when Reuters says of the men that the “Supreme Court is calling for their release” while it appears on closer reading of the Pakistani press that the “release” is from military detention into the hands of civilian authorities who would then try the men. Here is the Express Tribune: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel TIL2 NFL Coaches believe for their elite athlete players to adequately "defend" themselves they must knock out 120 pound women.
53sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel TIL 1: NFL owners never before realized they have power of coercion over their at-will employee players
1mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Who's going to pay for the latest Iraq war? http://t.co/6qf0l297rX And why do so called "fiscal hawk" GOP not seem to care? #WarProfiteers
18mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @DougWilliams85 My sleeper candidate is The Sandbaggers on BBC early 80's. Spy stuff in London. Great series.
38mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Are turtles allowed to be Speaker of the House? Ask @realDonaldTrump
59mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @AlisonForKY: Thank you @realdonaldtrump for firing @Team_Mitch and running him for "Speaker." Kentucky needs a new Senator. #kysen
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @AdamWeinstein: Al Lawson moves to advance all four FSU presidential finalists to the Board of Trustees. Lawson's aim is to keep Thrashe…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @thekarami: On July 26, 1988, less than a week after the ceasefire agreement, Saddam invaded Iran again, this time as support for the ME…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Any truth to the rumor that @NRA plans to hold a funeral for the 800 rounds of ammo found in White House fence-jumper's trunk?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @benjaminwittes ...and the Govt's lethal intentions as to Khan are entirely imaginary. Or, you know, not so much. cc: @mattapuzzo
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @benjaminwittes Right, and THAT is the key. Govt specifically+intentionally refused to say "we didn't know". I am sure just an oversight...
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @GrantWoods @ScottGreenfield ...that comment emanated out of. And I too have noticed fmr prosecutors changing tune 180º when turn def attys.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930