Aghanistan

Obama Still Clinging to 352,000 Afghan National Security Force Size Myth

Before the outbreak of green on blue killings that eventually led to a significant interruption in the training of Afghan security forces last September, it was impossible to read a statement from the US military or NATO regarding future plans without encountering a reference to a required 352,000 force size for combined Afghan National Security Forces. It was our training of the ANSF that was touted as our primary reason for remaining in Afghanistan because we need those trained troops available to take over security responsibility as we withdraw. I have been insisting since the interruption that it will be impossible to continue to claim that a functional ANSF force size of 352,000 can be achieved, as the known high rate of attrition continued during the training interruption. No new troop size prediction has emerged, but it was significant to me that references to the 352,000 force size claim had seemed to disappear.

Last night, President Barack Obama announced in his State of the Union address that he intends to withdraw about half the troops now in Afghanistan within the next twelve months, but he made no direct reference ANSF force size. Here are the three short paragraphs on Afghanistan in the speech as found in the transcript of his address:

Tonight, we stand united in saluting the troops and civilians who sacrifice every day to protect us.  Because of them, we can say with confidence that America will complete its mission in Afghanistan and achieve our objective of defeating the core of al Qaeda.  (Applause.)

Already, we have brought home 33,000 of our brave servicemen and women.  This spring, our forces will move into a support role, while Afghan security forces take the lead.  Tonight, I can announce that over the next year, another 34,000 American troops will come home from Afghanistan.  This drawdown will continue and by the end of next year, our war in Afghanistan will be over.  (Applause.)

Beyond 2014, America’s commitment to a unified and sovereign Afghanistan will endure, but the nature of our commitment will change. We’re negotiating an agreement with the Afghan government that focuses on two missions — training and equipping Afghan forces so that the country does not again slip into chaos, and counterterrorism efforts that allow us to pursue the remnants of al Qaeda and their affiliates.

Despite the specific force numbers cited with respect to US forces, Obama merely mentions “Afghan security forces” without telling us how many of them there will be. Resorting to the more detailed Afghanistan Fact Sheet released last night by the White House, however, shows that Obama still clings to the myth that there are 352,000 members of the ANSF. The Fact Sheet even goes to so far as to claim that this force level will be maintained for the next three years. I don’t believe I have seen this three year claim before: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @TyrannousLex People always forget that part when they defend organic food: these chemicals kill farmers.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TyrannousLex Yup: Mom has Parkinsons, probably in large part bc she spent 2 summers hanging out in her dad's Ag research lab.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Good historical background by @jadler1969 https://t.co/q5KR8wg9aD
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "Normal people really appreciate good science that’s done in their interest. " https://t.co/P5P4yP7BAQ
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TyrannousLex And all that's before you deal with rural areas & farming chemicals, no?
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JayAckroyd @digby56 What Digby says.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @amyrchapman Right? Is it just sexism that let Snyder run succesfully on that record but not Carly?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Peoples_Rights1 Just a checkup but he is getting old.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JordanAckerMI Here's to hoping!
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz So Jeb! thinks Elana Kagan is "out of the mainstream"? And Scalia, Alito and Thomas aren't?? Is Jeb! that stupid or just dishonest?
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @John_de_Vashon Hey now, I didn't absolve him of anything!
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "Lead was still seen as a problem that 'belonged' to poor people of color." https://t.co/0rK8x6AVTv
59mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2016
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829