ANSF capabilities

Shorter Gen. Nicholson: “Yeah, We Lied Earlier About Afghan Troop Capabilities, But You Can Believe Us This Time”

It would appear that even the Washington Post is beginning to see through the way that the Defense Department continues to make outrageous claims regarding the capabilities of Afghan National Security Forces. An article published last night to the Post’s website carries the headline “Panetta, other U.S. officials in Kabul paint rosy picture of Afghan situation”. The article opens in conventional news-as-transcription-of-government-narrative fashion:

With Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta in Kabul to take stock as the Obama administration weighs how quickly to draw down troops over the next two years, a senior U.S. military commander on Wednesday hailed the progress Afghan security forces have made.

Marine Maj. Gen. Lawrence D. Nicholson, the head of operations for the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan, said NATO troops have begun a radical shift in mission: doing the bare minimum to support Afghan troops, who, he said, are starting to operate unilaterally. “We’re now un-partnering from” Afghan forces, Nicholson told reporters Wednesday evening. “We’re at that stage of the fight.”

The article then plants a hint, stating that if Afghan forces are seen as achieving capability to function on their own, the US withdrawal can be accelerated from the current plan of taking another two years.

Remarkably, the Post then moves on to provide some perspective for Nicholson’s claim:

The assessment Nicholson offered, however, is far rosier than the one that U.S. officials have provided recently. They have been citing the resilience of the Taliban and the shortcomings of the Afghan government and military.

Just one of 23 Afghan army brigades is able to operate on its own without air or other military support from the United States or NATO, according to a Pentagon report to Congress that was released Monday.

But Nicholson wants us to believe that even though the Defense Department has been lying for years about Afghan troop capabilities, they really, really mean it this time and we should believe them:

Nicholson said that although U.S. commanders have made “disingenuous” claims in the past about the extent to which Afghans were acting as equal partners in joint missions, officials now see the Afghan army as ready to operate largely on its own, albeit with key logistical and financial support from NATO. The new strategy as the United States tries to transfer greater responsibility to the Afghan government and military is one of “tough love,” Nicholson said.

Sadly, Nicholson’s claims appear to have no more credibility than previous DoD claims on ANSF capabilities. Consider this exchange from the briefing held Monday at the Defense Department, featuring as speakers Senior Defense Official “[Briefer name deleted]” and Senior State Department Official “[briefer name deleted]” where we see that the Post isn’t the only media operation that sees through the duplicity. This exchange starts with a question from Lita Baldor of AP [emphasis added]: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @astepanovich Once went into an interview having just heard a smutty joke, got asked, "what's the last joke you heard."
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @WeMeantWell Hmm. I see your point. Not Clara, not IZYQ. But something else.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel To think Olive Garden could lose its land just because it doesn't salt its water. http://t.co/YqRCeM2LyA
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @Krhawkins5: Daash. Pejorative, authentic, & what Syrian tweeps have used for while (I think it's acronym of transliterated Arabic name)?
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @WeMeantWell Nut uh. Must be a Google killer. Where else are you gonna find the string IZYQ except in a really frustrating scrabble hand?
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mcdoobie What if they become the by-comparison-not-so-bad-guys in a few months? Happened with Assad.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Since no one has settled on its name yet, can we rename ISIS/ISIL/IS something that's easier to Google? Maybe IZYQ?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErikLoomis But hey. If it wins us back SCOTUS and keeps McCain out of SASC chair, cliche away.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErikLoomis Cue "what's the matter with Kansas" headlines.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 On many problems think the Courts are poised to fix. This one should be Congress' turn. @matthewstoller @JohnWonderlich
40mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bungdan Also, what do you do w/Blackwater and its ilk?
43mreplyretweetfavorite
September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930