CNET

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @WilliamOckhamTx Happy Birthday.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @TeresaKopec: Somewhere Birch Bayh is smiling. #TitleIX #teamUSA
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Is Blatter at this incredible Women's World Cup Final? No? Is it because he is an international fugitive for FRAUD+racketeering? Oh, I see
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @seemakalia: @bmaz Holder's Return to Covington Was Six Years in the Making | The American Lawyer http://t.co/9LZZ9GpLml
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @brycecovert Also mine.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @anamariecox: What I'm gathering is that scoring a goal from midfield is "playing like a girl."
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @drfarls Awesome. Just make sure she doesn't get kicked out of math class for chewing gum or it'll ruin everything.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @drfarls Good. Then we can expect a lot of them going forward. ;p
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @asherhuey No. Not even if they're the world's elite and the men aren't.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade She'd booger you while you were cycling together one day, I know of what I speak.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Foolishly said before this game no one could beat Sasic for golden boot.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Just before game started I said, "commentators keep saying Japan can't handle set pieces, thus far they have." That was 5:15 minutes ago.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
July 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031