CNET

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @CJMordock @walterwkatz @MikePerlstein How are the cops and prosecutors not facing felony charges? Amazing.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nigelduara @FateBrewCo @BPbrewing Been mening to check that place out. How's the pizza?
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Sheeyahshee: If corruption is the entree, is criminalizing dissenting speech & critical journalism an appetizer or dessert? http://t.co
7hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @AllenDeLaney Over the scoreboard! Right fielder never took a step, just turned around watching it fly.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @AllenDeLaney And a steal of home!
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yaelwrites @Sheeyahshee Shahid? Trust me the man is GUILTY!!
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yaelwrites Oh, it was my understanding that @Sheeyahshee is now a criminal!
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @F1Photo: Happy Birthday to Mario Andretti! Monza 1968, Mario's first F1 appearance. My dad's portrait of the man, magnifique! http://t.…
9hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV You can't fool @GatorZoneAlbert with those camo hats, Seawolves, he sees you in the dugout. http://t.co/VAMldQZFIY
10hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @raif_badawi: Very Urgent: An official source told me that Raif Badawi maybe facing death penalty for apostasy again
10hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DavidKlion Agree. Not his fault he's talking to real people. @Bourdain
10hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DavidKlion @Bourdain's interviewees have not had an easy time of it, between Nemtsov and Rezaian.
11hreplyretweetfavorite
March 2015
S M T W T F S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031