CNET

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @JRSigety @IanPGunn I admire the go git em attitude, but you are going to live tweet a stinking misdemeanor arraignment?? Heh.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joshgerstein @johngramlich Come on Josh, this will make things peachy again!
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Trump's America https://t.co/ZEyFD5Z5Ca
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Similarly, there is no reason for Clintons to drop out, if they quit being whiny ass titty babies. https://t.co/qJub2Bij7u
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Pete Rose has a point https://t.co/UCRPDf2POk
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DavidPurdum @WALLACHLEGAL @Norm_Clarke The man has a point.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ggreenwald: To belittle Sanders, Dem pundits insisted Primary Season head-to-head polls are worthless. They've now overnight declared t…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DLind @radleybalko @LilianaSegura Yes, been saying it for a while!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @DLind: @bmaz @radleybalko @LilianaSegura sorry did somebody say IIRIRA https://t.co/p8lrxJGm3N
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox Packers too.....Do it for Nibbles!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @LilianaSegura: "I suspect that there have may well been innocent people who were executed" after AEDPA, a former WH lawyer told me. htt…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @radleybalko: Tired of people excusing Clinton's crime policy as "well-meaning." It was cynical and crassly political. See AEDPA: https…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
May 2016
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031