CNET

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @bmaz Nearly every? You slacking off even before the season starts? @fordm
52sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Given Trump's silence abt guards needed to make any wall-or-fence work -- remember that's what @jorgeramosnews asked him about.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Rschooley True! Imagine the land rush to desert AZ for them. Trump could build condos to house them all.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @rickhasen: ELB Podcast Episode 3: Larry Lessig: Bold Campaign Reformer or Don Quixote? http://t.co/3B5sCvR2Pi https://t.co/OYcuOAivjU #…
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @fordm Well, you know we trash talk at Emptywheel nearly every weekend during football season. You and your mountain should stop by.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Donald Trump wants to employ ~200 border guards for every 5 miles of fence? https://t.co/UWBAu7AZfp
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV I seriously hope these were females....
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ScottGreenfield This is your chance to actually post a link. Seize it!
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @jvagle: The Difficulty With Metaphors and the Fourth Amendment. https://t.co/olekEtFK6O
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @dbaich @AnthonyMKreis @DPFocus Rawlinson is fucking horrible+will reverse Caney. So have to get both Graber+Watford to uphold. Hard to see.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Inclined to agree. You bring Mara for the show+to make an impression on him, think Berman is about to do just that. https://t.co/xP2tO9jRdw
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ArminRosen Like a war ship? Maybe we can just upgrade him to an aircraft carrier.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
August 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031