CNET

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel "Weirdly, GCHQ website no longer seems to support the use of https:// SSL / TLS encryption at all," https://t.co/vggju6F7ZA cc: @csoghoian
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Trialinsider: #SFPD officer in fed corruption plea deal to testify against 2 other officers. Stole money, drugs from suspects. http:/…
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @espinsegall @chrisgeidner @AppellateDaily @EQCF Jeebus, no kidding. Also citing Alito's dissent as affirmative authority is....bizarre
32mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV That moment when a subtweet surprises, revealing a rivalry previously unrecognized.
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @truthprevails89 We've always agreed abt the privatization of NSA. We used to beat up on Booz Mike McConnell too @GrayConnolly @20committee
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @gtlabsrat You know me better than that! I don't run unless being chase or chasing. Just wanted to make sure you weren't in town w/o visit.
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @gtlabsrat You weren't in Grand Rapids, were you?
58mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @TimothyS: Public service is not about money. We should draw a red line beyond which nothing is privatized. This is possible. @emptywhee
58mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @Krhawkins5: 3. The @CIA goes into full irony-is-dead mode and accuses Senate staff of conducting "inquisition." What, they used the wat…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AnonymousESQFL Worse though: I have a PhD. @TorEkelandPC
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @ElSnarkistani: .@jaylyall_red5 Somewhere @DanaRohrabacher is prepping for a Northern Alliance rodeo.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
October 2014
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031