Fazaga v. FBI

Even Liars Get To Invoke State Secrets

As the LAT first reported, Judge Cormac Carney has dismissed a suit, Fazaga v. FBI, brought by Southern California Muslims against the FBI for illegal surveillance. Carney actually made two rulings, one dismissing most of the suit on state secrets grounds and one dismissing part of the suit against the government–but not individual FBI officers–on FISA grounds.

The rulings are interesting for four reasons:

  • Carney has basically accepted the government’s claims in a case that is closely related to one where–three years ago–he called out the government for lying to him personally
  • Carney overstates the degree to which the Administration appears to be adhering to its own state secrets policy
  • The case is an interesting next step in FISA litigation
  • Carney suggests the FBI now investigates people for radicalization

Liars get to invoke state secrets

Three years ago, Carney caught the government lying to him about what documents it had collected on Southern Californian Muslims in this and related investigations. In an unclassified version of his ruling released last year, he revealed part of the government’s breathtaking claim.

The Government argues that there are times when the interests of national security require the Government to mislead the Court. The Court strongly disagrees. The Government’s duty of honesty to the Court can never be excused, no matter what the circumstance. The Court is charged with the humbling task of defending the Constitution and ensuring that the Government does not falsely accuse people, needlessly invade their privacy or wrongfully deprive them of their liberty. The Court simply cannot perform this important task if the Government lies to it. Deception perverts justice. Truth always promotes it.

Yet in finding the government’s state secrets invocation here, he is effectively accepting the government’s word–which in some way claims to have a real predicate for its investigation into Southern Californian mosques–over the word of their former informant, Craig Monteilh, who says he was instructed to collect information indiscriminately because “everybody knows somebody” who knows someone in the Taliban, Hamas, or Hezbollah.

→']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @astepanovich Not if Congress gets its way! Bring on the immunity!!!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @the_intercept: How gun violence compares with "domestic terror" as a threat to Americans: http://t.co/dIgIWQYQdB http://t.co/GmFp7Rr8zc
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @pastordan Time to bake more and put them into protective custody!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS It's that kind of cold that makes us resilient at the most important moments. ;p
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich Right: Sue loudly, 3 months late, as a way to avoid your own liability?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS You're going on Twitter where most are on E Coast/MW & claiming 41° is cold? It's been months since some of us have see that
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PGEddington Not least bc this looks counterproductive. @WhiteHouse
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @walterwkatz Lovely. Wonder how much one makes for such hackery. @MicahZenko
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MicahZenko: AEG hired fmr DHS chief Tom Ridge to say competing NFL stadium in LA would be a terrorist threat. http://t.co/6UT2w0PRg2
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @jb8sy: The 'Throwin' Mayoan' Kerwin Bell. @JU_Football “@Ristolable: This is the funniest thing I have ever seen http://t.co/0MbrMSnUt
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TyreJim I thought it was legal so long as you have a half order of fries on the table? @dmataconis
12hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728