Fazaga v. FBI

Even Liars Get To Invoke State Secrets

As the LAT first reported, Judge Cormac Carney has dismissed a suit, Fazaga v. FBI, brought by Southern California Muslims against the FBI for illegal surveillance. Carney actually made two rulings, one dismissing most of the suit on state secrets grounds and one dismissing part of the suit against the government–but not individual FBI officers–on FISA grounds.

The rulings are interesting for four reasons:

  • Carney has basically accepted the government’s claims in a case that is closely related to one where–three years ago–he called out the government for lying to him personally
  • Carney overstates the degree to which the Administration appears to be adhering to its own state secrets policy
  • The case is an interesting next step in FISA litigation
  • Carney suggests the FBI now investigates people for radicalization

Liars get to invoke state secrets

Three years ago, Carney caught the government lying to him about what documents it had collected on Southern Californian Muslims in this and related investigations. In an unclassified version of his ruling released last year, he revealed part of the government’s breathtaking claim.

The Government argues that there are times when the interests of national security require the Government to mislead the Court. The Court strongly disagrees. The Government’s duty of honesty to the Court can never be excused, no matter what the circumstance. The Court is charged with the humbling task of defending the Constitution and ensuring that the Government does not falsely accuse people, needlessly invade their privacy or wrongfully deprive them of their liberty. The Court simply cannot perform this important task if the Government lies to it. Deception perverts justice. Truth always promotes it.

Yet in finding the government’s state secrets invocation here, he is effectively accepting the government’s word–which in some way claims to have a real predicate for its investigation into Southern Californian mosques–over the word of their former informant, Craig Monteilh, who says he was instructed to collect information indiscriminately because “everybody knows somebody” who knows someone in the Taliban, Hamas, or Hezbollah.

Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @maassp I was interested in your comment abt being white male--his tributes are mostly from white men. Bc of the time?
33sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @abc7newsBayArea: JUST IN: Dallas nurse Amber Vinson who contracted Ebola from Thomas Duncan is virus-free. http://t.co/mNDQTT1jd3 http:…
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @VincePan1 I don't know that they're actually frightened. I think they're astute manipulators of the media.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ryanjreilly: Eric Holder is "exasperated" by "selective leaks" in the Darren Wilson case, a DOJ official tells me. #Ferguson
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "The Roman Empire fell because of lead in their pipes," they'll say. "America? That great Empire fell because it scared itself to death."
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Increasingly believe when they write epitaph for American Empire they'll say we peed our pants to death.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @pwnallthethings Yes. Bigger question is whether Pen Register on steroid is legal under current law. Or if they want something even more
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Gaius_Publius Listen. This is Guinness. I'm not playing. @bmaz
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel No, Obama Doesn’t Need Legislation to Fix the Dragnet–Unless the “Fix” Isn’t One https://t.co/kmF08JxVZk
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Gaius_Publius Cause they're looking for people like @bmaz to drink it, not girls like me.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Martina Doesn't look like they like women sports tweeters much. Not even Serena, prolly cause she really would kick their ass.
44mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BuffyBlogs Clearly.
57mreplyretweetfavorite
October 2014
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031