Fazaga v. FBI

Even Liars Get To Invoke State Secrets

As the LAT first reported, Judge Cormac Carney has dismissed a suit, Fazaga v. FBI, brought by Southern California Muslims against the FBI for illegal surveillance. Carney actually made two rulings, one dismissing most of the suit on state secrets grounds and one dismissing part of the suit against the government–but not individual FBI officers–on FISA grounds.

The rulings are interesting for four reasons:

  • Carney has basically accepted the government’s claims in a case that is closely related to one where–three years ago–he called out the government for lying to him personally
  • Carney overstates the degree to which the Administration appears to be adhering to its own state secrets policy
  • The case is an interesting next step in FISA litigation
  • Carney suggests the FBI now investigates people for radicalization

Liars get to invoke state secrets

Three years ago, Carney caught the government lying to him about what documents it had collected on Southern Californian Muslims in this and related investigations. In an unclassified version of his ruling released last year, he revealed part of the government’s breathtaking claim.

The Government argues that there are times when the interests of national security require the Government to mislead the Court. The Court strongly disagrees. The Government’s duty of honesty to the Court can never be excused, no matter what the circumstance. The Court is charged with the humbling task of defending the Constitution and ensuring that the Government does not falsely accuse people, needlessly invade their privacy or wrongfully deprive them of their liberty. The Court simply cannot perform this important task if the Government lies to it. Deception perverts justice. Truth always promotes it.

Yet in finding the government’s state secrets invocation here, he is effectively accepting the government’s word–which in some way claims to have a real predicate for its investigation into Southern Californian mosques–over the word of their former informant, Craig Monteilh, who says he was instructed to collect information indiscriminately because “everybody knows somebody” who knows someone in the Taliban, Hamas, or Hezbollah.

Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV Tragic: "2 adults, six children dead in Gilchrist shootings" - via @GainesvilleSun http://t.co/icorlFfx0N
13mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @ionacraig: Sporadic gunfire and very tense by tv station. Gunmen behind sand bags on one side of road, soldiers on other. #Yemen
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jilliancyork And domestically, the dragnet is equally designed to coerce informants.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Today Maricopa County Attorney @MontgomeryforCA @marcoattorney proves himself an ignorant Islamophobic hateful bigot http://t.co/b7tAohI841
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BeckyPallack Excellent job tweet covering it.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @kasie: Hey, America -- if you're unhappy with Washington, maybe look to the Scots and try voting in huge numbers. #rights #ScotlandDeci
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @robertcaruso Congress will give him the authority, they are too chicken not to, just go ahead and do it right.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @robertcaruso Tired of separation of powers being eroded
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @robertcaruso @nytimesworld And if that is Obama's tact, he should be impeached on the spot.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Will_Bunch Wow. I blew that off (yeah, Bai, you know) before seeing your tweet. Glad I read it. And you're right about the end. Jeez.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Will_Bunch: Don Spirit has killed 4X as many Americans as ISIS
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JoshMBlackman @mucha_carlos Actually, my understanding is Virginia Seitz left OLC at least partially over the targeted killing of citizens.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930