Fiat

Italian Automaker Brings about Chrysler Success after GOP Private Equity Failure

I’ve been a bit tardy in responding to Mitt’s latest cynical ploy, to pretend that rather than expanding production and jobs in both OH and MI, Chrysler is outsourcing production to China.

The Detroit News’ David Shepardson has a good fact check on Mitt’s latest ad here. Greg Sargent rounds of OH papers mocking Mitt’s claims here.

But there’s an angle on Mitt’s claims that has been missed. His ad says,

Obama … sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps, in China.

As Shepardson notes, Chrysler used to build Jeeps in China for the Chinese market. Ford builds cars in China for the Chinese market. GM builds cars in China for the Chinese market (GM also exports Chinese-built subcompacts to Latin America). Chrysler’s return to the world’s largest car market is smart business, something any viable global brand needs to do.

If it’s a moral failing for Presidents to preside over private car companies trying to compete in China, then Mitt has a problem with St. Reagan, during whose Administration Jeep first made groundbreaking entries into the Chinese market.

And if Mitt has a problem with Chrysler (or Ford or GM) building cars in China to sell in China, then he had better prepare to get far tougher with China than he has threatened to do so far. China still slaps huge tariffs on cars made outside of the country, so to be viable in the world’s largest automotive market, you have to build in China. That is the crux of the argument American car companies (and Midwestern politicians) have been making for decades: while the US allows imports from all countries, Japan and Korea and now China make it very difficult to export to those countries. This is not fair trade.

But I’m most offended by Mitt’s insinuation that selling Chrysler to an Italian company–he doesn’t mention Fiat by name–was disloyal.

Recall Chrysler’s recent history. Chrysler’s most recent strong point was the early 2000s, when it succeeded in developing nifty (albeit gimmicky) cars with shortened development cycles (think PT Cruiser). But as Daimler took more control over Chrysler, it invested less in the brand. GOP Private Equity firm Cerberus bought its first 80% of the company in 2007 and picked up the rest in 2009.

Cerberus had no intention of bringing Chrysler back to its former strength. Rather, it wanted to strip out the finance side of the company (it was investing in GMAC at the same time) and sell off the rest. But with the impending financial crisis, it never managed to pull off the trick (though it did get a bank bailout in the very last days of the Bush Administration). Meanwhile, it virtually put the Chrysler model development on autopilot while it tried to find a way to cut its losses.

Thus, when it came time for bailouts, there didn’t seem much to bail out at Chrysler. Unlike GM, which really had started making a turnaround, Chrysler had no product in the pipeline to suggest it would be worth bailing out (though it did have a few super efficient factories in the US).

Choosing to bailout Chrysler was the most difficult decision Obama made during the auto bailout. I’m not even sure I would have chosen to bail it out. And it was difficult precisely because a bunch of Republican vulture capitalist types–people like former VP Dan Quayle and former Treasury Secretary John Snow–had stripped the company.

[youtube]SKL254Y_jtc[/youtube]

In came Fiat and its Steve Jobs-like CEO Sergio Marchionne. Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @starshollowgzt @ChrisInParis What could go wrong??
44mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ElissaBeth @normative @michaellatulip Does DEA follow rule of law?? Haha, good one. What a naive question. DEA makes NSA look like pikers
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @william_pitts: I was just told of a fight I would pay waaaaay more than $100 to watch. @RondaRousey vs Mayweather. #TAKEMYMONEYNOW
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @kgosztola: Looks like FBI played role in radicalization of one of men involved in #TexasAttack http://t.co/dxV20XIpQM http://t.co/NOQWW
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @rickhasen Cuomo, but not rue Preet has the cojones to really pull the trigger on that.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @radleybalko: "Sentiment" doesn't kill. Bullets do. And shooting deaths of cops are down 48%, on pace for an all-time low. https://t.co/
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @KagroX: 37 pins on my accidental shootings at Walmart board https://t.co/sqU2ym3zxY JUST Walmart.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @HanniFakhoury I wonder what they will find?!?!
8hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bradheath Or maybe it's just a sign they're getting better at writing themselves immunity.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bradheath I'd believe the urgency more if the IC weren't writing a still more ridiculous exigent circumstances clause into USAF.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @BurritoBrosShit: Damn, Cinco De Mayo falls on a Taco Tuesday. Holy fucking shit.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @RaysBaseball: What 0-for-11 in replay challenges looks like: http://t.co/4ZkFydBA4L
9hreplyretweetfavorite
May 2015
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31