Fiat

Italian Automaker Brings about Chrysler Success after GOP Private Equity Failure

I’ve been a bit tardy in responding to Mitt’s latest cynical ploy, to pretend that rather than expanding production and jobs in both OH and MI, Chrysler is outsourcing production to China.

The Detroit News’ David Shepardson has a good fact check on Mitt’s latest ad here. Greg Sargent rounds of OH papers mocking Mitt’s claims here.

But there’s an angle on Mitt’s claims that has been missed. His ad says,

Obama … sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps, in China.

As Shepardson notes, Chrysler used to build Jeeps in China for the Chinese market. Ford builds cars in China for the Chinese market. GM builds cars in China for the Chinese market (GM also exports Chinese-built subcompacts to Latin America). Chrysler’s return to the world’s largest car market is smart business, something any viable global brand needs to do.

If it’s a moral failing for Presidents to preside over private car companies trying to compete in China, then Mitt has a problem with St. Reagan, during whose Administration Jeep first made groundbreaking entries into the Chinese market.

And if Mitt has a problem with Chrysler (or Ford or GM) building cars in China to sell in China, then he had better prepare to get far tougher with China than he has threatened to do so far. China still slaps huge tariffs on cars made outside of the country, so to be viable in the world’s largest automotive market, you have to build in China. That is the crux of the argument American car companies (and Midwestern politicians) have been making for decades: while the US allows imports from all countries, Japan and Korea and now China make it very difficult to export to those countries. This is not fair trade.

But I’m most offended by Mitt’s insinuation that selling Chrysler to an Italian company–he doesn’t mention Fiat by name–was disloyal.

Recall Chrysler’s recent history. Chrysler’s most recent strong point was the early 2000s, when it succeeded in developing nifty (albeit gimmicky) cars with shortened development cycles (think PT Cruiser). But as Daimler took more control over Chrysler, it invested less in the brand. GOP Private Equity firm Cerberus bought its first 80% of the company in 2007 and picked up the rest in 2009.

Cerberus had no intention of bringing Chrysler back to its former strength. Rather, it wanted to strip out the finance side of the company (it was investing in GMAC at the same time) and sell off the rest. But with the impending financial crisis, it never managed to pull off the trick (though it did get a bank bailout in the very last days of the Bush Administration). Meanwhile, it virtually put the Chrysler model development on autopilot while it tried to find a way to cut its losses.

Thus, when it came time for bailouts, there didn’t seem much to bail out at Chrysler. Unlike GM, which really had started making a turnaround, Chrysler had no product in the pipeline to suggest it would be worth bailing out (though it did have a few super efficient factories in the US).

Choosing to bailout Chrysler was the most difficult decision Obama made during the auto bailout. I’m not even sure I would have chosen to bail it out. And it was difficult precisely because a bunch of Republican vulture capitalist types–people like former VP Dan Quayle and former Treasury Secretary John Snow–had stripped the company.

[youtube]SKL254Y_jtc[/youtube]

In came Fiat and its Steve Jobs-like CEO Sergio Marchionne. →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Hey haters: Brady has a pit bull mix. http://t.co/jLcxgsJ5Es cc: @phillipanderson
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Waiting for the GOP to challenge DC/FAA's no drones in DC rule now. Heller 2.0.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel So public corruption and spying in one week, Preet. Think maybe NOW you could muster up a bankster?
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel If this Russian spy isn't as pretty as Anna Chapman, what will New Yorkers watch on TV while the snow melts?
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LOLGOP Sure. But he'll find a way to use it to direct federal funding to some bigwig developers.
44mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @darth: "little higher...little hi...oh crap..uh oh" http://t.co/bLVyahjX8I
44mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich My advice is like all my advice: sensible shoes. (Also, if the power goes out, check to see if there's free sushi)
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel King Salman "known to have held cogent conversations as recently as last Oct." http://t.co/cJqJzkuGyz Did anyone ever say that abt Reagan?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade But again, if the power goes out there may be free sushi in the offing.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MicahZenko: Of 355 Americans killed by terrorism since 9/11, 80% died in Iraq or Afghanistan-wars started to prevent safe havens. http:…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @phillipanderson As I said, airdrop the snowmobiles.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @phillipanderson Well, your airports aren't 19th century. They're mid-20th century. @joanneleon
1hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2015
S M T W T F S
« Dec    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031